美托儿所费用高 拜登援助计划难纾困
大公报
10/10/2021
【大公报讯】据美国《纽约时报》报道：美国财政部上月报告指，美国每个孩子的平均护理费用约为每年1万美元（约7.8万港元），约占家庭收入的13%，这个数字已经超于政府认为是可以负担的标准的两倍。护理费用成为美国家长的沉重负担，但民主党总统拜登提出的援助计划，却遇到重重阻拦。
在北卡州的格林斯伯勒，洛利夫妇两个孩子在进入幼儿园之前，每个月的托儿所支出将近2000美元，这是他们家庭收入的三分之一，也比他们的房子贵得多。但在他们儿子去的讬儿中心，教师迈尔斯的时薪只有10美元，所以她一周工作60小时，要打两份工，另一份在星巴克，时薪15美元还有医疗保险。迈尔斯拥有儿童早教副学士学位，她说：“我塑造儿童未来，时薪只有10美元；而给顾客泡咖啡时薪却有15美元。这毫无道理。”
Tel: 551-580-4856 | Email: F.WINNIE.S@GMAIL.COM
据财政部的数据显示，教师的年平均收入约为24000美金，当中不少人生活贫困，近一半要接受公共援助。讬儿中心工资低留不住教师。此外，新冠疫情更令离职潮恶化，虽然有部分雇主竞相提高薪金，也有教师不愿冒健康风险，照顾尚未接种疫苗和不戴口罩的孩子。
美国民主党提出3.5万亿美元社会福利预算法案，其中有一项旨在向全美大约四分之三的家庭提供补贴，将家庭幼讬支出控制在收入的7%以内，让父母能负担讬儿服务的费用，因此可以投入职场，释放社会劳动力；同时计划希望提升讬儿教师的薪金，改善其生活水平。不过有保守人士和家长担心，该计划意味增税，也可能对其他没有使用讬儿服务的家长不公平。
Child Care Has High Costs for Parents, Low Wages for Staff
USA News Lab
10/10/2021
GREENSBORO, N.C. — To perceive the issues Democrats hope to resolve with their supersized plan to make little one care higher and extra inexpensive, think about this small Southern metropolis the place many dad and mom spend extra for care than they do for mortgages, but lecturers receives a commission like quick meals employees and facilities can not hire sufficient employees.
With its white pillars and hovering steeple, the Friendly Avenue Baptist Church evokes an illusory previous when fathers left for work, moms stayed dwelling to mom, and schooling started when youngsters turned 5. But its sought-after preschool illuminates the dilemmas of contemporary household life.
Until their elder son began kindergarten this fall, Jessica and Matt Lolley paid virtually $2,000 a month for their two boys’ care — roughly a 3rd of their earnings and way over their funds on their three-bedroom home. But one of many lecturers who watched the boys earns so little — $10 an hour — that she spends half her time working at Starbucks, the place the pay is 50 p.c greater and contains medical insurance.
The heart’s director needs to boost wages, however has little room to move alongside prices to oldsters who’re already stretched. She has been making an attempt since February to exchange a instructor who give up with out warning; 4 candidates accepted the job in flip, however none confirmed up.
“I’ve been an administrator for 30 years, and I’ve never seen anything like this,” stated the director, Sandy Johnson. “Directors are at the point where they’re willing to hire anyone who walks through the door. The children deserve far more than that, and the families deserve far more than that.”
Democrats describe the issue as a elementary market failure — it merely prices extra to offer care than many households can afford — and are pushing an unusually bold plan to bridge the hole with federal subsidies.
The enormous social coverage invoice being pushed by President Biden would cap households’ little one care bills at 7 p.c of their earnings, provide massive subsidies to little one care facilities, and require the facilities to boost wages in hopes of bettering instructor high quality. A model earlier than the House would value $250 billion over a decade and lift annual spending fivefold or extra inside just a few years. An extra $200 billion would supply common prekindergarten.
“This would be the biggest investment in the history of child care,” stated Stephanie Schmit, an analyst on the Center for Law and Social Policy, a analysis group that helps the measure. “For too long, parents have had to struggle with the high cost of care, while child care providers have been incredibly undervalued and underpaid. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to do right for everyone.
Prospects stay unsure for the broader invoice, which incorporates new academic, well being care, and child-rearing subsidies. Some Democrats balked at Mr. Biden’s request for $3.5 trillion over 10 years and proposed a determine nearer to $2 trillion.
Republicans strongly oppose the security web enlargement, saying that it’s unaffordable and smacks of socialism, and a few conservatives warn the kid care provisions would inflate prices, impose burdensome rules, and penalize dad and mom preferring casual care.
As Democrats describe it, little one care is a matter not simply of household finance however of macroeconomics (dad and mom want it to hitch the work power); brain growth (a lot of which occurs earlier than youngsters begin college); and racial fairness (the low-paid work power is disproportionately composed of minorities).
In Greensboro, dad and mom know little in regards to the Democrats’ plan however a lot about little one care prices, which may trigger them to reconfigure work hours, postpone the acquisition of automobiles and home equipment, or have fewer youngsters than they want.
“We had no idea child care was going to cost this much,’’ said Ms. Lolley, who works in human resources for the public school system and whose husband sells plumbing fixtures at Lowe’s. “There’s no way we could afford to have another child.”
Greensboro has been a hub of kid care advocacy since at the least the early Nineties, when native organizers helped lead a nationwide marketing campaign known as Worthy Wages, which sought to boost pay and enhance working situations. The state authorities is also referred to as a pacesetter. It provides scholarships to little one care employees who need extra schooling and runs two wage-subsidy packages, which collectively attain about one in eight little one care employees and supply common bonuses of roughly $2,400 a year.
Still, the issues of excessive prices and low wages stay.
“Much of what North Carolina has done is terrific, but it’s going to take the resources of the federal government to make change on the scale we need,” stated Rosemarie Vardell, a retired professor who helped lead the Worthy Wages marketing campaign.
The Treasury Department reported last month that the typical value of care is roughly $10,000 a year per little one and consumes about 13 p.c of household earnings, almost twice what the federal government considers inexpensive. At the identical time, it famous the typical instructor earns about $24,000 a year, many reside in poverty, and almost half obtain some public help.
“It’s among the lowest-paid of all occupations,” stated Lea J.E. Austin of the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment. “People have a hard time seeing that this is complex, specialized work.”
The coronavirus pandemic has made the issue worse. Competing employers have raised pay, and a few lecturers are afraid to oversee youngsters who can’t be vaccinated or masked. Nationally, the work power has declined by about 12 percent from prepandemic ranges.
“Everyone I know has significantly increased entry-level pay, and we’re not close to being able to fill positions,” Ms. Johnson, the Friendly Avenue director, stated on a current name with different Greensboro directors.
“Ditto!” stated Donna Danzy, who runs two extremely rated facilities. “There are dwindling numbers of people interested in doing this kind of work. They are not seeing the joy.”
“There are really great centers who have had to close,” stated one other director, Devon Walton. “We have a waiting list a mile long.”
While administrators say they can not hire, lecturers say they can not pay their payments. Earning $10 an hour on the Little Leaders Learning Academy, Uvika Joseph, a single mom, bought meals stamps and Medicaid for her three youngsters. She simply left to turn out to be an assistant within the public faculties, the place she expects to earn almost twice as a lot and can obtain medical insurance.
“The only reason I am leaving is the pay,” she stated. “I love the kids.”
To make ends meet, Rashelle Myers, who has an affiliate diploma in early childhood schooling, splits a 60-hour workweek between the Friendly Avenue heart and Starbucks. She known as the Democrats’ plan to boost wages “amazing” and overdue.
“I make $10 an hour to shape the future of children but make $15 an hour to hand someone a cup of coffee,” she stated. “That doesn’t make sense.”
Low pay results in excessive turnover, which the Treasury Department stated was at the least 26 p.c a year. April Harden Crocker, a Friendly Avenue instructor, has taught for almost three a long time — “it’s my passion, it’s my heart, I just have to do it” — however she warned that worker churn harms care.
“Babies don’t like strangers’ faces — if you keep bringing new people in, they get really upset,” she stated. “If the pay was better we would get more devoted people.”
Child care is dear as a result of it’s labor intensive. Many facilities spend half or more of their budget on wages, so elevating pay has a serious monetary affect. Under the Democrats’ plan, the federal authorities would cover all new prices for the primary three years, however states would then pay 10 p.c.
How a lot Democrats would elevate pay stays unclear. The House invoice says little one care employees ought to obtain a “living wage,” which it doesn’t outline, but in addition says they need to be paid the identical as elementary educators with the identical credentials, a distinct customary.
Other uncertainties stay. Mr. Biden proposed subsidies for about three-quarters of households, excluding probably the most prosperous. But the House model covers everybody.
Beyond legislative element, progressives are searching for a paradigm shift. They see little one care very like public schooling: a service on which society relies upon and due to this fact ought to guarantee.
“It’s a public good and should be treated that way” stated Julie Kashen, a senior fellow on the Century Foundation. “The shared stake in seeing children thrive doesn’t suddenly begin when they turn five.”
But conservatives concern authorities intrusion into the household realm. Rachel Greszler, an analyst with the Heritage Foundation, recently warned Congress that the measure would enhance prices and drive small facilities out of business, particularly these primarily based in properties and church buildings. She additionally stated the coverage would penalize dad and mom who keep at dwelling, taxing them to increase center-based care and ignoring the “tremendous personal and societal value” of full-time child-rearing.
Ms. Lolley stated she thought of staying at dwelling after having a second little one however wanted the medical insurance that got here along with her job.
“Oh my God, it was terrible,” she stated of the associated fee, greater than $20,000 a year, of getting two youngsters in care. She held on with vital assist from her dad and mom, figuring out that “we wouldn’t have a kid in day care forever.” Most Greensboro dad and mom, requested in regards to the invoice, agreed the issue it tackles are critical, however their views of federal assist diverse.
“I’d love for this to pass,” stated Melissa Robertson, a freight dealer, after listening to a abstract of the laws. She and her spouse stated their two youngsters are thriving on the Wishview Children’s Center, however it prices twice as a lot as their mortgage, and a scarcity of toddler care causes Ms. Robertson to work at home a number of days every week.
“It can be kind of difficult when you’ve got a screaming baby in the background,” she stated. “Sometimes clients are like, ‘Oh, can’t you get them into child care?’” With two working dad and mom the norm, she stated, “We should be able to provide child care.”
But one other Wishview dad or mum, Jamie Pritchard, had reservations. She and her husband, Matt, who work on the similar insurance coverage agency, have three youngsters in care and pay about $34,000 a year. “Basically, my paycheck goes to pay for child care,” she stated.
Still, she warned subsidies might result in greater taxes. “If we were not financially stable, we would be all for that,” she stated. “But I always think that if we’re getting help, the money has to come from somewhere.”
Ms. Lolley knew nothing of the plan till a reporter described it and reacted with enthusiasm tinged with concern. She praised the potential monetary aid and the “wonderful” assist for lecturers, whom she known as devoted and “very underpaid.”
But she additionally famous that federal money usually brings federal guidelines.
“If it would make things worse for the school in any way,” she stated, “I personally would rather stretch to keep paying the bills.”
美国股市动荡，适于做空，如何操作？
(免费讲座 – Oct 11, Mon, 9PM EST)
请扫描海报上二维码：
或直接点击 Zoom 报名链接：
https://zoom.us/webinar/register/6316336221018/WN_yvmcDteARpGx4yjf2g3mww
诚招美国和加拿大法律服务代理
因公司发展需要，诚招美国和加拿大法律服务代理。
要求：
懂英语、或西班牙语、或法语。
能合法工作有社安号或工号。
无需改行， 可以兼职。
大学生和有销售经验优先考虑。
自雇生意公司发美国报税1099，加拿大T4A
有意了解详情， 请扫码加微信， 非诚勿扰！
Boston Overhauls Admissions to Exclusive Exam Schools
A new policy will increase representation of Black and Latino students in the prestigious public schools, which serve as a gateway to elite colleges.
By Ellen Barry
7/17/2021
BOSTON — Long into the night on Wednesday, parents and students waited in line to say their piece about Boston Latin School and who deserves to attend it.
Shirley Chen-Weng said she arrived in this country from China without speaking English, and raised her children to work hard and succeed. Why, she asked, shouldn’t they get a spot?
Julia Mejia, a Latina city councilor, said she spent her school years working at a shoe store to help her mother pay the rent, without a spare minute for test preparation. What about students like her?
And Gabby Finocchio, a 2019 graduate who is white, said she was admitted to the school because her parents had time and money to spend on the process. In a more equitable admissions system, she might not get in, she said, but “I’m OK with that.”
After five and a half hours of emotional discussion on Wednesday night, the Boston School Committee voted unanimously to overhaul admissions to the city’s three selective exam schools, opening the way for far greater representation of Black and Latino students.
The new admissions system will still weigh test results and grades, but, following a model pioneered in Chicago, it will also introduce ways to select applicants who come from poor and disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Under the new system, the applicant pool will be divided into eight groups based on the socioeconomic conditions of their neighborhoods. The admissions team will consider applicants within each group, admitting the top students in each tier in roughly equal numbers.
“This was really a watershed moment,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, 34, the daughter of Haitian immigrants, who said she was admitted to Boston Latin School only after her father stumbled across a free test preparation course. That path, through a school that “can literally open a door to endless possibilities,” led on to Columbia University, Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School.
“If any of those events didn’t happen, I don’t know where I would be today,” said Ms. Louijeune, who is running for Boston’s City Council. “The world has been open to me. How do we make sure I am not an anomaly?”
The traditional admissions system, which its supporters defend as merit-based, ranked applicants according to grades and test scores. But it also gave rise to a culture of tutoring and test preparation, and resulted in incoming classes that were overwhelmingly white and Asian.
Boston has joined a long list of school districts trying to address racial inequities in its selective academic programs. The debates have divided communities, raising painful questions about whose children deserve to be admitted.
In New York City, the nation’s largest school district, a recent push to eliminate an admissions exam for its top high schools has sputtered, even as the city announced other changes to the way hundreds of selective middle and high schools choose their students.
A proposal by Mayor Bill de Blasio to get rid of the entrance exams to the city’s most elite schools, such as Stuyvesant High School, became extremely divisive, prompting accusations that he was discriminating against low-income Asian American children and pitting Asian families and Black and Latino families against one another. In the end, the State Legislature, which had to approve the change, declined to take action.
Fairfax County, Va., faced a similar challenge. In 2020, the school board agreed to eliminate the admissions test to its flagship math and science magnet school, only to face two lawsuits from families, many of them Asian American, who said the move had inflicted harm on their children.
The same divisions have emerged in Boston. Among the most passionate objections expressed on Wednesday night came from Asian American parents, who said their children were hardly all affluent, and would be unfairly disadvantaged by the new system.
Asian American students were 29.3 percent of Boston Latin School’s enrollment in 2020, despite making up 9 percent of students in the school’s district.
“When they were young, we instilled them with the idea of working very hard to be the best,” said Ms. Chen-Weng, speaking through a Cantonese translator. “There’s a misconception that we’re discriminating against others, but that’s not true, because when we came here, we had nothing. We worked hard to get what we could get.”
Judith Nee, an alumna of Girls’ Latin School, said the white students affected by the change were “firefighters and civil servants’ kids,” not the truly affluent.
“What does it get you other than depriving everyone of perhaps the one real advantage to step up in the world — by weakening the rigor of Latin?” Ms. Nee said. “I literally get sick to my stomach with the thought that we are going to alter a 350-year-old proven world-renowned pathway to a life of intellect. It’s not easy to come by for city kids.”
For decades, sixth graders across the city have crammed for an annual entrance exam, hoping to receive an invitation to Boston Latin School, the most selective of the three schools, which counts among its alumni four presidents of Harvard, four Massachusetts governors and five signers of the Declaration of Independence.
Ms. Finocchio, who entered Boston Latin School as a ninth grader, said it did not take long for her to see patterns in the neighborhoods her classmates came from — middle-class and predominantly white — and by her sophomore or junior year, she was convinced that something needed to be done about it.
“Once I realized how the system works, it was a question of, OK, when are they going to change it?” she said.
Ben Hoffman, 20, who graduated in her class, said he routinely overheard older people fretting about whether the quality of the schools would suffer, “thinking it’s going to be the worst thing ever, and ultimately change the school.” He doesn’t agree. “To some extent, I am puzzled about why so many people in that demographic think it’s going to be a problem,” he said.
It is no surprise that the change is occurring now, as Boston itself has changed.
The middle-class, predominantly white neighborhoods that fed large numbers of seventh graders into exam schools each year had resisted attempts to change admissions, said Lew Finfer, an organizer with Massachusetts Communities Action Network, who has pushed for new policies for 20 years.
But the political clout of those neighborhoods had begun to wane even before last year’s racial justice movement swept through the city, he said, while also crediting “relentless efforts” by Boston’s N.A.A.C.P. and other legal advocates for the new policies.
“There was a degree of reckoning with the George Floyd murder that made it harder to defend sacred cows that were discriminatory,” he said. “That doesn’t mean every institution changed, or every policy. But there was more pressure to deal with things.”
In 2019, voters elected a City Council that was, for the first time, dominated by women and people of color. And all four front-runners in November’s election for mayor are women of color. Among the leading candidates for mayor, only one — City Councilor Annissa Essaibi George — has objected to the change in policy, tweeting that it had been voted in hastily.
“While the plan claims to level the playing field and create improved access, it has not,” she said. “It is unclear, untested and not informed by families across the city.”
City Councilor Andrea Campbell, a Boston Latin School graduate who is also running for mayor, said in a statement that she had “heard from hundreds of parents who are excited by the change and just as many who are worried about how this new policy will impact them because they don’t see another excellent option for their student in the B.P.S. system, which I think proves that this inequitable system is failing all of us.”
Many expect the new policy to face a court challenge. But others were in the mood to celebrate.
“There’s a historical debt owed to families and students of color in Boston public schools,” said Peter Piazza, an educational researcher, describing a litany of efforts to resist desegregation of city schools, including violent riots over busing that shook the city in the 1970s.
“The so-called exam schools are one tiny part of this history,” he said. “But the access is enormously important for the students, whose lives can be changed by the opportunity. We owe them a debt. Let’s pay it at 100 percent.”
Boston’s racial tensions have always spilled out into public view when the subject turns to schools. The tug of war over exam school admissions has led to the awkward and abrupt departure of three members of the school committee.
The committee chair, Michael Loconto, resigned last fall after he was caught, during a recorded Zoom meeting, mocking the surnames of Asian American parents making public comments on the issue.
That was followed by the publication of text messages exchanged between two other members, Alex Oliver-Dávila and Lorna Rivera, expressing frustration with parents from West Roxbury, whom one of them referred to as “Westie whites.”
Both Ms. Oliver-Dávila and Ms. Rivera resigned, too.
TJ High School Admits 550 Students Under New Admissions Policy
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, a top high school in the U.S., admitted students under a revised admissions policy.
By Emily Leayman
6/24/2021
FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA — Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, a governor’s school and one of the nation’s top high schools, announced the incoming freshman class chosen with the new admissions policy.
TJ admitted 550 students for the class of 2025. The Fairfax County School Board has voted to change the admissions policy, eliminating the standardized admissions test, eliminating the $100 application fee, raising the minimum grade point average, and increased the freshman class size from 480 to 550.
Spots in the class of 2025 were determined by the top 1.5 percent of applicants from every middle school. For the first time in at least a decade, every Fairfax County Public Schools middle school has students who were accepted to TJ.
The school saw an increase in applications this year — 3,034 compared to 2,539 in the last school year. The 3.9074 average GPA of applicants was higher than recent years, while the 3.9539 average GPA of accepted students was similar to past years.
As the admissions policy changes aimed to increase access to underrepresented student groups, there were some increases in several demographic groups. Black students made up 7.09 percent of accepted students, while last year’s admission was “too small for reporting,” meaning 10 or less. Hispanic students made up 11.27 percent of accepted students, compared to 3.3 percent last year.
The percentage of white students admitted also increased from 17.7 percent to 22.36 percent. Asian students still represent the majority of admitted students, although the percentage fell from 73 percent to 54.36 percent.
The percentage of economically disadvantaged students admitted also had a significant increase from 0.62 percent to 25.09 percent. Special education students represent 2.36 percent of accepted students, and English Language Learners represented 7.09 percent.
The Coalition for TJ, a group of parents, students, alumni, staff, and community members opposed to the admissions changes, responded to the admissions announcement in a statement. The coalition believes the changes discriminated against Asian students and has an active federal lawsuit.
“We love Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, and we congratulate every student accepted for admission into the TJ Class of 2025,” the coalition stated. “Fairfax County Public Schools has also broken the hearts of many deserving students by waging a crusade against Asian students at the school, first by proposing a random lottery and later by implementing the current race-balanced ‘holistic’ admissions system that amounts to social engineering.”
The coalition also denounced critical race theory, an academic concept studying how racism can be found in various public policies. Opponents see it as a wedge that pits people of color against white people, according to Education Week.
“We seek fairness for all families and students, and we reject the racism of the ideology of ‘critical race theory’ that promotes admissions lotteries and race quotas while killing merit,” The Coalition for TJ stated. “We will continue to fight for an American Dream in which all people have equal protection under the law.”
Thomas Jefferson High School is an admissions-based governor’s school open to students in Fairfax County as well as Arlington, Loudoun, and Prince William counties, and cities of Fairfax and Falls Church. The school was recently ranked the top high school in the nation by U.S. News and World Report.
Parents Defending Education
4/19/2021
Parents Defending Education is a new grassroots organization determined to fight woke indoctrination in classrooms nationwide. “We believe our children’s education should be based on scholarship and facts, and should nurture their development into the happy, resilient, free-thinking, educated citizens every democracy needs,” the organization says.
The website DefendingEd.org features a robust IndoctriNation Map, where visitors can “learn about parent organizations, incidents and FOIA’s” in their area. And Parents Defending Education wants to hear from you: click here to help them shine a light on educational malfeasance in Fairfax County Public Schools!
A new video from Parents Defending Education succinctly conveys the organization’s vision. “I want my child to learn how to think, not what to think,” the voiceover says. “But in K-12 schools today, activists are pushing a radical new agenda. Instead of creating educated individuals, they are trying to create activists, turning blank slates into members of racial, ethnic or gender groups in conflict with each other — but it doesn’t have to be like this.”
Source: https://fairfaxgop.org/watch-parents-defending-education/
A Lawsuit Challenges TJ Admission Changes
Parents sue to stop TJ’s admission policy changes, alleging anti-Asian race discrimination.
By Mercia Hobson
3/19/2021
The Fairfax County School Board and Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Scott Brabrand face a new lawsuit filed against them last week in United States District Court in Alexandria. The lawsuit alleges race discrimination against Asian-American students by the School Board and the superintendent in changing the admissions process to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, known as “TJ.” The Pacific Legal Foundation filed the civil suit on Wednesday, March 10, on behalf of their client, Coalition for TJ, a group of mostly concerned parents at the high school.
#“This type of racial balancing is unconstitutional,” said Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Erin Wilcox at a press conference held that morning outside the courthouse.
Six Spaces Home Staging
Contact: Hongliang Zhang
Tel: 571-474-8885
Email: zhl19740122@gmail.com
#The Plaintiffs allege FCPS’ recently-implemented overhaul of the TJ admissions process changes, which eliminated the long-standing race-neutral standardized admissions test, is specifically aimed to reduce the number of incoming Asian-American students to racially balance the school according to the racial demographics of the school. “Up until this year, admissions to TJ have been race-blind,” said Wilcox. “Unfortunately, Fairfax County Schools officials apparently believed that this is too many Asian students,” she said.
Pacific Legal Foundation holds a press conference on March 10 announcing that they filed a lawsuit against the Fairfax County School Board and Superintendent Scott Brabrand on behalf of their client, Coalition for TJ, challenging recent changes to the admissions policy at Thomas High School for Science and Technology.
#THE COMPLAINT alleges that without the court issuing an injunction, the number of Asian-American students in the incoming TJ Class of 2025 is likely to be cut in half due to the “defendants’ stated desire to manipulate TJ’s demographics.” “The discriminatory intent they’ve shown is intertwined and an inseparable part of the policies they put in place,” Wilcox said.
#According to the lawsuit, in the fall of 2020, Superintendent Brabrand and the School Board saw a reporting requirement by the Virginia Department of Education to include the racial/ethnic make-up and socioeconomic diversity of its students, faculty, and applicants as an opportunity “to completely overhaul the TJ admissions process in order to racially balance the school’s demographics, going far beyond the minimal reporting requirements.”
#Located in Alexandria, TJ is a regional Virginia state-chartered magnet school operated by FCPS with students eligible for admission from Fairfax, Arlington, Loudoun, and Prince William counties, and the City of Falls Church. TJ is ranked the number one public high school in the 2020 National Rankings.
#The School Board voted to eliminate the TJ merit-based admissions test at its Oct. 6 work session with no public comment opportunity. The complaint quotes Brabrand during the discussion at the work session with the Board to say that eliminating the merit admissions test “eliminat[es] the testing component that squeezed out talent and squeezed out diversity in our system.” Board members said they hoped the new process increased Black and Hispanic representation in the student body.
#On Dec. 17, the School Board voted and adopted, with immediate implementation, further changes to the TJ admissions policy applicable to the incoming TJ freshman Class of 2025 and to future years. The Board adopted the challenged admissions policy that limits the number of students accepted from each county feeder middle school to the top 1.5 percent who meet the minimum evaluation criteria-GPA, student portrait sheet, problem-solving essay, and experience factors: including economically disadvantaged students, English language learners, or special education students.
#The lawsuit alleges that coupled with the high concentration of Asian-American students at four middle schools – Carson, Kilmer, Rocky Run, and Longfellow – and their history of sending large numbers of students to TJ, racial balancing could be accomplished.
#According to the complaint, the plaintiffs sought “to vindicate the rights of Asian-American public school children in and around Fairfax County, Virginia, to compete on an equal footing for admission to the nationally-ranked Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ) without regard to their race.” Overall, Plaintiffs’ data analysis reported in the complaint that the student body at TJ, at approximately 73 percent Asian-American students under the merit-based race-blind admissions system would drop to 31 percent under the new racial-balancing admissions system for the Class of 2025 with “no other racial group projected to lose seats.”
#The lawsuit alleges changes to admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment “…a promise that government at every level will treat every American as an individual, not simply as a member of his or her racial group. Policies like the one implemented by FCPS stand in direct opposition to that promise.”
#THE PLAINTIFFS requested entry of an order requiring the Defendants to return to the admissions procedure for entry into TJ in the fall of 2020. “The Coalition for TJ is not going to stand for this kind of discrimination against Asian-American students and they are here to fight for equal protection for their children,” said Wilcox.
#Julia McCaskill, an immigrant, and parent of a TJ student and students in grades 8 and 6, said at the March 10 press conference that TJ does not belong to a certain race or certain group of people. Low admission rates at TJ for Black and Hispanics are the failure of the FCPS Board, according to McCaskill. “They failed those under-represented areas over the decades instead of fixing the pipeline issue. The authorities are stirring up hate against Asian-Americans hoping to slash the number of Asian-American students will fix the overdue school problem.”
#Asra Nomani, a cofounder of Coalition for TJ and parent of a senior at TJ, said during the press conference that she came to the United States at age four from India. Nomani said she was proud to be working the past nine months with families who came to the United States from communist China and eastern Europe, India, and other places where they faced injustice. “They never could have imagined that they would face injustice in America,” she said.
#A Fairfax County Public Schools spokesperson provided a statement saying, “The process continues to be race-neutral and merit-based… As a Governor’s school, we value diversity and believe that it contributes to the richness of the education at TJHSST.”
#Parents of 17 middle school students filed the initial lawsuit in November 2020 to overturn the School Board’s decision to eliminate the standardized admission test for TJ and the $100 application fee. On Feb. 2, a Fairfax Circuit Court Judge John M. Tran denied the parents’ request to require mandatory standardized testing in the admissions process. Tran said, “The debate over standardized testing belongs to educational professionals.”
#On Friday, March 12, Wilcox said that the next step would be the defendants’ response, either an Answer or a Motion to Dismiss, in approximately 60 days. “I’ve seen in various news articles that FCPS issued a statement on Wednesday. Their legal response to our complaint will be one of the documents mentioned,” Wilcox said.
Source: http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2021/mar/19/lawsuit-challenges-tj-admission-changes/
Judge declines to halt elite school’s admissions changes
2/04/2021
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A judge on Tuesday refused to issue an injunction to stop an elite northern Virginia high school from changing its admissions policies.
Fairfax County Public Schools is overhauling the admissions process at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, which has been ranked as the top public high school in the country.
The school board hopes the changes will increase diversity at the school, which has long failed to attract Black and Hispanic students. Standardized tests that have long been part of the admissions process have been scrapped in favor of a more holistic review.
Supporters of the existing system sued, citing state regulations designating TJ as a school for the gifted and stating that giftedness should be measured by a standardized test.
Circuit Court Judge John Tran declined to issue an injunction that would immediately bar the changes from taking effect, but the lawsuit itself can still go forward.
A conservative legal group is also weighing a challenge based on racial discrimination against Asian Americans who currently make up a majority of the student body.
Students, Parents Challenge TJ Admissions Changes
Coalition for TJ | Press Release
11/07/2020
Seventeen parents filed a lawsuit against the Fairfax County School Board and Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Brabrand for illegally changing the admissions process at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology.
TJ, as the school is known, is the nation’s top-ranked public high school, according to U.S. News & World Report. Established in 1985, the STEM-focused Governor’s School has long maintained rigorous, merit-based, race-blind admissions standards that include the administering of a set of standardized tests. In an October 6 work session, however, the Fairfax County School Board voted to abolish the school’s admissions tests, and the superintendent abruptly eliminated the tests from this year’s admissions process.
The lawsuit alleges that the school board and superintendent violated state laws and regulations requiring that a “nationally norm-referenced aptitude test” be used as part of the TJ admissions process to identify gifted learners with an aptitude for STEM. As a Governor’s School, TJ provides services to gifted students, or advanced academic learners, and receives special funding from the Commonwealth for this purpose.
Today, the Coalition for TJ held a press conference outside the Fairfax County Courthouse, announcing that the 17 parents had filed a lawsuit against school officials. “The basis for the complaint against Fairfax County School Board and Scott Brabrand is relatively simple,” Coalition for TJ co-founder Glenn Miller said at the news conference. “Virginia law, which is the superior law and controls the actions of Fairfax County and its school board, contains specific requirements that must be followed in order to admit students to TJ. Fairfax County and its school board violated those laws. As such, the Fairfax County School Board and the superintendent acted beyond their authority and acted arbitrarily and capriciously.”
The abolition of TJ’s standardized admissions tests will invariably reduce the number of Asian students at the school. The lawsuit’s 17 plaintiffs are families of current middle schoolers who are disadvantaged by the admissions changes. Plaintiff James Pan, father of a gifted middle schooler, spoke at today’s press conference. “FCPS is using the pretext of banning the test for their goal of reducing Asians at TJ,” Pan said. “The government is using a process that is plain old bigotry.”
Plaintiff and middle school parent Srinivas Akella said that he chose to live in Fairfax County for its program for gifted students and for TJ, in particular. “The school board and FCPS arbitrarily made changes to the admissions process in violation of state law,” Akella said today. “I have faith in our judiciary, and I am petitioning them as a last avenue since there was no other recourse left for me to pursue.”
Following the plaintiffs’ remarks at today’s press conference, Coalition for TJ co-founder Asra Nomani spoke of the opportunities that TJ has afforded generations of immigrants in Fairfax County. “My father came here for the American Dream. My son pursued it here in this country and is now a student at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology,” Nomani said. “We should not allow anyone — including the Fairfax County School Board and Superintendent Scott Brabrand — to stand in the way of justice. We are all here for the justice that America provides, and I applaud these courageous families.”
WATCH:
•Nov 5, 2020
