世卫：人类可能永远无法消灭新冠病毒
环球网
01/20/2022
世卫组织卫生紧急项目负责人：人们可能永远也无法消灭新冠病毒，这种病毒或将最终成为生态系统的一部分。
18日，2022年世界经济论坛视频会议期间举行了有关疫苗公平问题的边会。会上，世卫组织卫生紧急项目负责人迈克尔·瑞安发言表示，人们可能永远也无法消灭新冠病毒，这种病毒或将最终成为生态系统的一部分。
瑞安表示，人们需要做的是降低发病率，最大限度地为全世界人口接种疫苗，这需要更加公平的疫苗分配。瑞安说，目前，全世界已有一半以上的人口接种了两剂新冠疫苗，与之相比，只有7%的非洲人口接种了两剂疫苗。
专家：快筛准确率非百分之百 仍有遗漏
世界新闻网
01/18/2022
新冠肺炎在变种病毒Omicron的强大传播力下，疫情变得非常严峻，许多人都担心确诊。除了PCR检测之外，居家自行检测也是重要的检测渠道之一。不过，不少公卫专家提醒，快筛最好要「成对使用」，例如相隔一、两天采检，以避免在出现「假阴性」。毕竟影响检测的变量很多，例如，检测者可能在足够病毒存在之前太早检测；或者，在已经将病毒传播给其他人之后才检测，已经太晚。
根据CaliforniaHealthline.org指出，大多数的快筛都应该「成对使用」，例如相隔一、两天采检，提高其准确度。可是，市面上有少数品牌以一盒只有一个试剂的方式出售。而且实际的情况是试剂价格昂贵并且供不应求，很多家庭通常只依赖一次快筛。不少案例都显示，虽然检测快筛时呈阴性，但后来还是成为传播者。药剂师胡斯托（Julie Ann Justo）就在圣诞节参加室内家族聚会，虽然聚会的前几天许多人使用快筛获得阴性，可是没想到，在一周之内至少13名参加聚会的亲人在新冠病毒检测时却呈阳性，其中许多人还出现上呼吸道病毒的典型症状，例如喉咙痛和流鼻涕。
对此，专家表示，尽管家用抗原检测（即快筛）仍然是对于遏制疫情的有用并且尚未被充分利用的工具，但却经常遭到滥用，并可能「给予人们错误的信心。」
CaliforniaHealthline.org引述田纳西州纳什维尔的范德比尔特大学医学院传染病专家沙夫纳（William, Schaffner）表示：「有些人错误地将家用快筛结果视为『免罪卡』（get-out-of-jail-free card），即『我是阴性，所以就不必再担心了』。」
华盛顿大学医学院检验医学与病理学系临床副主任马蒂亚斯（Patrick Mathias）也表示，Omicron变种病毒传播能力非常强，「于对聚会活动使用任何类型的筛检策略，成功率都充满了挑战。」他指出，如果是针对已有症状的人检测是否感染，快筛是非常准确，几项研究估计准确率约在70%到近90%之间。一些在当前变种出现前或更加受控的环境下进行的其他研究还显示出更高的准确率。当然，即便如此，快筛仍可能漏掉一些受感染者。
可是，对于没有症状的人，抗原筛检的结果则不太准确。由前联邦疾病控制及预防中心主任弗里登（Tom Frieden）经营的非营利组织「Resolve to Save Lives」的流行病预防顾问戈德瓦瑟（Shama Cash-Goldwasser）就表示，对于无症状患者，平均而言来说快筛正确检测到感染的几率约为50%。
沙夫纳进一步，检测正确率一个关键细节是「检测的时间」；另一点是检测能够发现真阳性和真阴性的程度。太早检测，例如在接触病毒后的一两天内采检，结果恐怕不准确。同样地，在活动前几天进行检测，也无法确认谁在聚会当天可能具有传染性。
沙夫纳等专家建议，在知道接触病毒后三天开始自行检测。如果感觉不适，则在症状出现几天后开始检测。因为，检测到感染的时间表具不确定性，最好按照说明使用盒中的两个试剂筛检。在第一次检测后24到36小时，再进行第二次检测。如果要参加活动，则最好确保在聚会当天进行其中一次检测。
华人大妈亲述奥米克戎的得病经历
By Wu Zhong
01/18/2022
我是去年三月打的第一针疫苗, Moderna , 四月第二针，然后十一月底打的 Booster, 都是 Moderna 。
第二针和 Booster 都有明显的疫苗反应，不过过了24小时都好了 。 结果去年圣诞节的时候还是被感染上的，没有Loss of taste, 所以估计就是 O 了. PCR和 Rapid test 都测了阳性，所以肯定是确诊的了。
中间几天病得算不轻的，发烧到102.4, 差点准备去 ER, 不过还是凭着身体硬抗过来，吃了很多维生素片，现在20多天了，测了还是阳性，每天会有不间断的咳嗽，有痰。
还有个问题就是每天晚上睡觉起来都会有严重的头疼，之前是没有过的。现在只能祈祷今后没有严重的后遗症了。
我感觉算比较倒霉吧，平时都是 WFH, 一般出门买菜也就 Costco, 而且我都是戴 N95或者 KN95 的，现在是强烈怀疑是在 Costco 被传染的。
俄研究：奥密克戎在陶瓷表面存活时间最短
文 / 林煇智
01/18/2022
（早报讯）俄罗斯一项最新研究显示，冠病变异病毒奥密克戎在陶瓷表面存活时间最短，病毒的传染性在24小时内消失。
新华社报道，为评估奥密克戎毒株的传染性，俄罗斯“矢量”病毒学与生物技术国家科学中心研究人员在同等空气相对湿度（30%至40%）和温度（26至28摄氏度）条件下，在金属、塑料、陶瓷板上和蒸馏水中对奥密克戎毒株存活性进行比对实验。
结果表明，奥密克戎毒株在陶瓷表面失去活性的速度最快，不到24小时就已检测不到。
该机构称，奥密克戎毒株活性下降的动态变化总体上与此前发现的其他冠病变异毒株并无不同，因此使用消毒剂依然是预防感染的有效方法。
以色列初步研究 打第4剂疫苗恐无法预防Omicron
中央社 | 耶路撒冷
01/17/2022
根据以色列初步研究结果，注射第4剂COVID－19（2019冠状病毒疾病）疫苗会使人体抗体数量超出注射第3剂，但恐怕仍不足以预防感染Omicron变异株。
以国希巴医疗中心（Sheba Medical Center）传染病部门负责人芮格夫－尤柴（Gili Regev－Yochay）指出，注射第4剂疫苗会使抗体数量「比注射第3剂再多一些」；并说，这只是初步研究结果，尚未正式发表。
以色列一年前是初步施打疫苗速度最快的国家，上个月已开始为最脆弱的高风险人口施打第4剂疫苗，也就是第2追加剂。
“频繁接种或致免疫力下降，应像流感一样打疫苗”
韩国中央日报
01/13/2022
在以色列等部分国家已开始实施新冠肺炎疫苗第四针接种的情况下，有人指出，过度反复接种新冠疫苗反而会对免疫系统产生负面影响。
据彭博社11日(当地时间)报道，欧盟(EU)下属机构欧洲药品管理局(EMA)当天警告称，如果每4个月追加接种一次新冠疫苗，最终可能会导致免疫力下降。EMA解释说，各国应增加注射间隔，在像流感一样寒冷的季节前接种。
EMA主管疫苗的负责人马尔科·卡瓦列里(Marco Cavaleri)当天在媒体会上说，虽然可以再接种一次新冠病毒疫苗，但我认为不能持续反复接种疫苗”，“我们需要思考如何将目前的疫情转变为本土流行病”。
上述警告也出现在已经实施第4轮接种的以色列。由专家组成的以色列疫苗咨询委员会去年12月底建议60岁以上高龄人群和免疫低下人群等进行第四轮接种，但卫生部以数据不充分为由暂时搁置批准。当时一些科学家担心，如果数次接种疫苗，反而会使免疫系统疲劳，导致身体与冠状病毒抗争的能力受损。
以色列著名传染病专家、舍巴医疗中心教授埃亚尔·莱塞姆(Eyal Leshem)认为，接种2次疫苗及之后再打一次疫苗就能起到充分的预防效果。
莱塞姆教授当天接受CNBC电话采访时说，如果接种三次疫苗，相对长期持续免疫，可以防止陷入新冠病毒引起的重症”，“为了应对变异，可能需要每年更新疫苗，但如果毒性较弱，比如奥密克戎的情况，如果已经完成了2-3次接种，可能不需要再进行接种”。
目前，以色列以高危人群为中心对免疫低下者、高龄人群、医务人员等实施了第4轮接种。智利也在前一天开始了针对免疫低下者的第四轮接种，下个月将把接种对象扩大到第三轮接种满6个月的55岁以上成年人。
最新民调：已完成接种疫苗美国民众逾三分之一仍染疫
世界新闻网
01/12/2022
Axios新闻网站与市场研究调查机构易普索(Ipsos)11日公布最新联合民调显示，已完成接种新冠疫苗的美国民众当中，超过三分之一仍然感染新冠病毒。调查结果显示，高达九成受访者说，认识的亲朋好友之间有人感染病毒；另有57%受访者表示，反对政府发放失业救济金给不遵守雇主疫苗接种规定而丢掉工作的劳工。
调查结果显示，已完成接种(fully vaccinated)的民众当中，有36%表示后来还是照样染疫，接受病毒检测得到阳性结果。相较之下，2021年12月中旬的相同问卷调查里，已完成接种受访者当中有22%表示后来仍然染疫，2021年夏季期间，已完成接种民众当中只有6%表示后来还是感染新冠病毒。
这项调查是在今年1月7日至10日之间进行，访问对象为抽样选出的全美1054名18岁以上成年人，抽样误差在正负3.2%以下。
Axios新闻网站报导，从这项最新调查的结果可以看出，绝大多数美国人为Omicron变种病毒感到忧虑，为了降低曝露于病毒的风险、减少病毒传播，日常生活当中做出了某些相对调整。
On January 11, 2022, the Senate HELP Committee met with federal officials to discuss the response to new COVID-19 variants.
报导指出，调查结果也反映了美国民众对疫情感到忧心的可能原因：新冠疫苗恐怕不足以对抗Omicron变种病毒。
易普索美国事务公关部总监杨格(Cliff Young)指出，美国民众觉得受到疫情再度袭击，纷纷调整生活方式，「如果他们自己并没有调整，关系非常密切的亲人则都做出了调整」。
易普索副总裁纽沃尔(Mallory Newall)说，Omicron疫情升高期间，美国民众生活调整非常广泛，几乎回到2021年4月间居家避疫的状态，而当时绝大多数美国人都还没打疫苗。
统计显示，总计52%受访民众说，若要回归到美国发生新冠疫情之前的正常生活，恐怕还要一年以上；约有75%受访者说，与2020年春季相比，感觉现在染疫风险更高。
Jan 11, 2022
Dr. Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and other health officials testified before a Senate committee Tuesday on the federal response to COVID-19 and new variants. The Biden administration announced Monday Americans with private insurance will be able to ask for reimbursement for at-home rapid tests beginning Saturday.
在没有打疫苗的受访者当中，30%表示Omicron疫情让他们变得较可能愿意接种疫苗。在去年12月的相同调查中，仅19%未打疫苗受访者说，因为Omicron疫情而变得较愿意接种疫苗。
在这项调查中，57%受访者表示，反对政府发放失业救济金给不遵守雇主疫苗接种规定而丢掉工作的劳工。
才打第三剂新冠疫苗, 电视主播节目中突重摔倒地 骇人视频疯传
文章来源: 东森新闻
01/11/2022
巴西一名电视台主持人不久前接种第三剂新冠疫苗，3日在直播节目中看来一切正常，没想到播报到一半身体45度倾斜，下秒重重倒地，工作人员和观众都吓了一跳。这段影片掀起热议，部分网友质疑，这可能是第三剂疫苗副作用。
当地媒体报导，现年36岁的席尔瓦（Rafael Silva）是巴西TV Alterosa电视台节目主持人，3日在节目中突然心脏病发倒地。影片中可见，席尔瓦对着镜头播报到一半，身体开始向后倾斜，平板从手中飞出，接着整个人重重撞上身后的背板，昏倒在地。电视台赶紧切换画面，但他昏倒的过程已经完整播出。
事发后现场工作人员马上将席尔瓦送医，他在前往医院途中5度心脏麻痹，情况相当危急，所幸经过治疗后已经没有生病危险，目前仍在加护病房，但病情稳定，预计11日再度接受检查。
Jan 3, 2022
他昏倒的画面在网路上疯传，令许多网友感到震惊。有人翻出席尔瓦的推特发文，发现他不久前才刚接种第三剂疫苗，当时还开心亮出照片。因此有传言指出，席尔瓦心脏病发是疫苗引发的副作用，不过电视台人员已经出面否认此说法。
席尔瓦的同事洛佩斯（Kadu Lopes）说明，他在去年12月28日接种疫苗，昏倒则是在3日，有人说他是打完疫苗突然不适，但专家已经排除这种可能性，且为席尔瓦治疗的医师表示，他患有先天性心脏病，这次昏倒也和他的遗传性疾病直接相关，并非疫苗副作用。
Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries/Deaths
11/06/2021
Rumble — Roundtable discussion with vaccine injured and medical experts on federal vaccine mandates and the importance of health care freedom.
美国陆军飞行医官特蕾莎中校关于新冠疫苗的证词
By 萧笙客
11/06/2021
11月2日，飞行医官特蕾莎·朗中校在约翰逊参议员主持的关于新冠疫苗的圆桌会议上的作证。
美国德州胡德堡陆军基地负责四千名陆军飞行旅官兵身体健康和飞行安全的军医特蕾莎反对对官兵、特别是飞行员强制性注射疫苗，向法院提出的临时禁令书写的补充材料。
Sen. Johnson hosts panel highlighting people claiming to be harmed by COVID-19 vaccines
By WEAU 13 News
11/06/2021
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WEAU) – Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson is giving a stage to people who claim they were harmed by COVID-19 vaccinations.
Tuesday, Johnson held a roundtable with several people who say they or a loved one experienced life-altering side-effects from various COVID vaccinations.
One panelist, who says she experienced adverse side effects from the vaccine, called for a federal safety net for others who are also injured.
Another woman at the meeting claimed that those who catch COVID receive medical help, while those who have adverse side effects to vaccines are ignored.
The panel included researches and doctors who generally agreed vaccines have a role in fighting the pandemic, but also cautioned against mandating them.
Johnson said the panel is not about creating fear or increasing vaccine hesitancy, but says federal health officials aren’t being honest when they say the vaccines are safe and effective, and shouldn’t be mandated.
“I had COVID,” Johnson said. “I’ve had my antibodies tested as my doctor told me. I’ve got a whopping level of antibodies.”
Johnson also spoke about his personal vaccination decision.
“Again, natural immunity should be strong, pretty long-lasting, which is the case of very, you know, many, many illnesses, many viruses,” Johnson said. “And so there’s no reason for me to get a vaccine.”
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fact page maintains the vaccines are safe and effective. It also acknowledges the existence of some of the adverse effects discussed at Johnson’s roundtable, and says COVID vaccines are under the most intense safety monitoring in U.S. history.
Survey: Majority of Federal Employees Disagree With Biden’s Vaccine Mandate
Comments submitted as part of the survey show a diversity of thought on the requirement.
By COURTNEY BUBLÉ
he majority of federal employees recently surveyed (53%) strongly or somewhat disagreed with the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, while 44% strongly or somewhat agreed with it.
The Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive, sent a survey between October 27 and November 2 to Government Executive and Defense One readers, which drew 3,186 respondents. The survey had a 95% confidence level and margin of error of +/- 3%; the vast majority of respondents currently work for a federal agency but the results did include some retirees and congressional and private sector workers. President Biden announced the mandate on September 9 and the deadline is November 22.
“I am not pro or anti-vaccine, I am pro-choice,” wrote one federal employee in the comments section. “It should be a choice not a mandate, last I knew this was a free country.” Anonymous comments submitted as part of the survey show the diversity of thought on the mandate as well as the nuance of arguments on both sides.
Thirty-percent of respondents said they thought the vaccine mandate will be slightly or moderately effective in protecting the federal workforce from the coronavirus; 42% thought it will be very or extremely effective and 29% thought it will not be effective.
“The vaccine mandate is most likely legal. It’s also probably effective,” said a respondent. “It, however, does not mean the federal [government] should have the power to force adults and the civilian workforce to get a shot that they don’t want.”
The mandate requires all federal employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19 by November 22, or claim a religious or medical exemption. Those who decline vaccination and whose agencies deny their exemption requests will face progressive discipline, up to removal from the federal service.
Another respondent said, “the mandate will not be effective if the many false religious exemptions are approved,” because “most are not sincerely held beliefs, but just people that don’t want to get their vaccine.”
A different person said, “A coworker’s choice not to be vaccinated increases my potential exposure to COVID, potentially increases my workload if I have to cover for them if they are out ill and increases the cost of [Federal Employees Health Benefits]/Medicare.”
The survey looked at the difference of views among those on full telework compared to those going into the office at least one day a week. The chart below shows approval and disapproval levels based on that status, with those going into the office at least once a week more likely to strongly disapprove of the mandate.
“If you can do your job, i.e. telework, without contacting others there is no reason to be vaccinated,” said one federal employee in the comments section. “It is the individual’s body and they should have the right to decide what is done to it without fearing economic ruin.”
Another said, “I worked and put the protocols in to keep everyone safe. I worked on the front lines for the last two years and now you want to fire me?”
One respondent who said they work for the Agriculture Department’s Farm Service Agency said they love their job and customers they serve, “but lately I do not feel the agency has my back or appreciates the work our agency does. After being on the front lines, figuring out telework, changing the way our agency goals are achieved I feel the employees deserve a little more than a ‘do it or get out policy.’ ”
As for the ability to enforce a vaccine mandate, 50% of respondents strongly or somewhat disagreed that the federal government has the authority to enforce the requirement, while 46% somewhat or strongly agreed. There were no major differences in responses from managers and non-managers to this question; however, there were some differences among those in different work environments, as shown below.
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a legal opinion in July that says federal law doesn’t prohibit public and private entities from mandating coronavirus vaccines, even if those vaccines do not yet have full authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Also, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a similar decision in May, which it updated in October.
As for regions, the area with the highest approval rating (54%) of the mandate was the D.C. metro area, which is where federal agency headquarters are concentrated. Respondents living in the Southwest had the highest disapproval rating.
“The D.C. power brokers are using us as pawns,” said a respondent.
While not a question in the survey, many raised concerns in the comments section about loss of employees due to the mandate.
“Is the federal government prepared to lose 20-30% of its workforce to retirements, resignations or terminations?” said one respondent.
“I will retire from federal service if I am threatened with discipline/firing,” said another. “ I am proud of my military service (Vietnam veteran) and federal service (FBI and [Internal Revenue Service]) and continually received ‘outstanding’ performance evals as GS-14. The federal mandate is morally wrong.”
Someone else said, “this is a train wreck, but may provide promotion opportunities for the younger workforce.”
However, there were also several comments encouraging vaccinations. “I sincerely appreciate efforts to get our team vaccinated,” said one person. “I am grateful for the mandate and wish it had come sooner.”
For comparison, a recent survey from Qualtrics, an experience management company, found that the majority of respondents (58%) supported vaccine mandates from either employers or the federal government.
“Employees in the [technology and information technology] industry are the most supportive of federal vaccine mandates compared to those who work in health care, retail and government,” said Qualtrics. “Roughly a quarter of government, health care, and private employees oppose mandates that would apply to them.”
Overall, 42% of respondents want their company leaders to enforce the mandate, while 39% do not, the Qualtrics survey found. That survey was done between October 12 and 15. There were 1,309 respondents who were chosen from a randomized panel and deemed eligible if they live in the United States, are an adult and are at least part-time employees.
Government Executive previously reported about reactions to the mandate from NASA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and other federal employees. While some agencies have shared their vaccination levels with reporters, lawmakers or the public, the levels are not known for all. Top House Republicans are seeking those numbers by November 10.
In one example, as of late October, several intelligence agencies had at least 20% of their workforce unvaccinated, with some as high as 40%, said Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, who is a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Associated Press reported on Friday. He cited information that the Biden administration gave to the committee, but hasn’t released publicly, and didn’t name the specific agencies since the full results were classified.
Biden admin considering vaccine mandate for businesses with fewer than 100 employees
OSHA rule for big businesses forces employees to be vaccinated or wear masks and get weekly COVID-19 tests
By Tyler Olson | FOX Business
11/05/2021
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is “seeking comment” about whether businesses with fewer than 100 employees should be subject to the COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandate it is implementing on big businesses.
OSHA’s requirement will force businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccines or else their employees will need to wear masks and be tested for COVID-19 weekly. It will go into effect Jan. 4.
But according to a summary released by OSHA, it appears to be considering implementing the rule for small businesses as well.
“OSHA is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly, but is less confident that smaller employers can do so without undue disruption,” the summary says. “OSHA needs additional time to assess the capacity of smaller employers, and is seeking comment to help the agency make that determination.”
The same language is included in the Federal Register page for the vaccine rule.
A Department of Labor spokesperson told FOX Business Friday that it is indeed considering whether to extend the vaccine or mask and testing mandate to businesses with fewer than 100 workers.
“OSHA chose a 100-employees threshold at this time because the agency is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly,” the spokesperson said. “Because the emergency situation required OSHA to act quickly, the information immediately available to the agency did not allow it to confidently assess the impact on smaller firms.”
The spokesperson added: “OSHA will consider whether to extend the rule to smaller firms in the public rulemaking that begins with the publication of this emergency rule.”
Raytheon CEO warns company could lose ‘several thousand’ employees over vaccine mandate
By Mike Brest
10/27/2021
Raytheon Technologies’s top boss warned that the U.S. aerospace and defense company will lose thousands of employees who have thus far refused to comply with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
“So, we’re going to be faced on Dec. 8 with a choice. We’re going to potentially lose several thousand people who refuse to be vaccinated,” Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday. “Now, this is a tough thing, but we are preparing for it.”
Hayes also said that 83% of the company, which has a total workforce of roughly 125,000 U.S. employees, according to Reuters, is already vaccinated while another 6% are “in the process of being vaccinated.”
Additionally, there is another 3% of employees who are seeking either a religious or medical exemption, while another 3% have said they don’t intend to receive the vaccine, the CEO added, though he did not address the status of the employees who do not fall into those categories.
The company has already begun hiring people to fill the upcoming vacancies, Hayes said.
Raytheon had issued a companywide mandate requiring vaccination by Jan. 1, but that order was usurped when President Joe Biden declared that all federal contractors must receive the vaccine by Dec. 8.
Hayes’s comments came the same day Alabama Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville sent a letter to the White House claiming that Biden’s “federal contractor vaccine mandate will have negative effects on our national security” and called on the president “to remove — or, at a minimum, delay and clarify — vaccination requirements on private companies and academic research institutions that are actively supporting the Department of Defense.”
Similarly, nearly a dozen Republican lawmakers on the House Armed Services Committee petitioned the White House and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to reverse the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate for contractors over fears that it could lead to supply chain issues.
Roughly 100 employees at United Launch Alliance, a Lockheed Martin and Boeing joint venture that contracts to both the Pentagon and NASA, walked off the job Monday over the federal government’s vaccine mandates and pledged to continue protesting in the days leading up to the deadline to be vaccinated.
Former WSU football coach Nick Rolovich to sue university over firing after refusing vaccine
According to a press release sent by his attorney, Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior.”
By KREM Staff
10/20/2021
PULLMAN, Wash. — Former Washington State University football coach Nick Rolovich was fired Tuesday, Oct. 19 after refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and now he plans to sue the university.
According to his lawyer, Rolovich will be taking legal action against WSU and all parties responsible for his termination. The decision to terminate Rolovich came after his request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the WSU. According to his lawyer, WSU “indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made.”
Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior,” according to the statement from his lawyer, Brian Fahling.
“Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired,” Fahling says. “Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation.”
In the statement, Fahling says, “Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Rolovich and his family. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”
Pope Francis, the leader of the Catholic Church, has encouraged people to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
Here is the statement from Rolovich’s lawyer in full:
“The termination of Washington State football coach Nick Rolovich on Monday was unjust and unlawful.
It came after Coach Rolovich’s request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the University. The institution also indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made. As a result, Coach Rolovich will be taking legal action against Washington State University, and all parties responsible for his illegal termination.
Immediately after terminating Coach Rolovich, WSU Athletic Director, Pat Chun, directed campus police to escort the coach to his car, he wasn’t allowed into his office, and he was not even allowed to speak to his team. Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired. Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation.
Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Coach Rolovich and his family. Furthermore, the University’s deceitfulness about being unable to accommodate Coach Rolovich even if his religious exemption request had been granted, is exemplified by Chun’s actions arranging a “secret” donor trip that he had Coach Rolovich attend at the height of the pandemic in July 2020.
During that excursion, Chun and other attendees contracted the disease, but Coach Rolovich did not. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Coach Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”
KREM has reached out to WSU for a statement but has not yet received a response.
320万年薪傲视全州公务员 华盛顿州立大学教练拒打疫苗遭开除
10/20/2021
华盛顿州立大学(Washington State University，WSU)足球队总教练罗洛维奇(Nick Rolovich)年薪320万元，在领取州政府薪水的公务员收入排行榜称霸。但因罗洛维奇拒绝遵守华州要求公务员必须接种新冠疫苗的规定，本周稍早已被开除。华盛顿邮报报导，罗洛维奇堪称到目前为止，最为引人注目的公职人员拒打疫苗而丢饭碗案例。
华盛顿州立大学18日宣布已经解聘罗洛维奇。华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队(Washington State Cougars)体育主任秦派特(Pat Chun，音译)指出，罗洛维奇拒绝配合疫苗接种规定，已经失去获得校方聘用的资格。
秦派特在声明中说，这起事件让学校足球队感到沮丧。
42岁的罗洛维奇出身于夏威夷大学(University of Hawaii)足球队，2019年曾获西部山区联盟(Mountain West Conference)最佳教练。罗洛维奇年薪320万元，是领取华州州政府薪水的公务员当中排行最高者。
罗洛维奇今年暑假已经表明坚决不打疫苗，太平洋十二校联盟(Pacific-12 Conference)在洛杉矶举办媒体宣传，由于规定全体出席者必须打疫苗，罗洛维奇便因此缺席。
秦派特指出，校方与罗洛维奇协商长达数月，但罗洛维奇态度坚定，「他有权做出选择，他的决定就是不配合规定」。
华盛顿州立大学校长薛尔兹(Kirk Schulz)则在声明中说，虽然少数人士拒打疫苗而引发轩然大波，但学校接近90%雇员及97%学生则都打了疫苗。
薛尔兹说：「人们可以做选择，而且有好几个月的时间可以决定。这并不是突然发生的。」
除了罗洛维奇之外，华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队另外四名助理教练罗戈(Ricky Logo)、理查森(John Richardson)、史特兹曼(Craig Stutzmann)、韦伯(Mark Weber)，同样因为拒打疫苗，一并遭到开除。
美国ESPN知名体育记者拒打疫苗被开除
本文源自: 金融界网
10/20/2021
迪士尼旗下娱乐与体育节目电视网（ESPN）的知名记者艾莉森-威廉姆斯（Allison Williams）周一表示，她因为拒绝接种新冠病毒疫苗而被解雇，下周将是她在这里工作的的最后日子。
这位明星记者最出名的是她对美国大学橄榄球和篮球比赛的报道，她在社交媒体上的一段视频中说，她要求豁免不接种疫苗的请求被拒绝了。
威廉姆斯从2011年3月开始为ESPN工作。上个月，她在推特上发表声明称，在咨询了医生后，她拒绝接种疫苗，因为她和她的丈夫正试图生第二个孩子，接种疫苗“不符合我的最佳利益”。
ESPN的母公司迪士尼是众多要求员工接种疫苗的企业之一。该公司在一份声明中说，不会对威廉姆斯的个案置评。迪士尼表示，公司正在按照其法律义务，处理员工提出的豁免要求。
ESPN’s Allison Williams explains why she’s giving up her job over a vaccine mandate
By ANDREA HSU
10/20/2021
Lance King/Getty Images
ESPN college basketball and football reporter Allison Williams has joined a small minority of workers who have quit or been fired from their jobs over a vaccine mandate.
“I have been denied my request for accommodation by ESPN and the Walt Disney Company, and effective next week, I will be separated from the company,” she said in a video posted to Instagram on Friday.
ESPN’s parent company, Disney, had announced a vaccine mandate over the summer with a deadline of this Friday, Oct. 22.
In early September, Williams shared on Twitter that she’d decided not to get a COVID-19 vaccine while she and her husband were trying to have a second child.
“Taking the vaccine at this time is not in my interest,” she wrote.
The CDC has urged people who are pregnant or might become pregnant to get vaccinated, saying there is currently no evidence showing COVID-19 vaccines cause fertility problems and no data pointing to an increased risk of miscarriage among people who received an mRNA vaccine during pregnancy.
In the Instagram video, Williams spoke of her medical apprehensions about receiving the vaccine and added, “I am also so morally and ethically not aligned with this.”
“Ultimately, I cannot put a paycheck over principle, and I will not sacrifice something that I believe and hold so strongly to maintain a career,” she said in the video. “I’m going to pray things get better and that I can see you on the television set in some capacity in some stadium, covering some game soon.”
Williams, who had reported for ESPN since 2011, acknowledged she’s not the only one walking away from a career or a profession they love.
Hundreds of hospital workers have quit rather than get vaccinated, but they represent only a tiny fraction of employees overall. For example, Duke Health in North Carolina reported it had fired just 20 people out of a workforce of 23,000.
Meanwhile, United Airlines said it is terminating a couple of hundred of its 67,000 employees who did not comply with the airline’s vaccine mandate. Other employers that have imposed vaccine mandates are also reporting compliance rates topping 90%.
Veteran police officer resigns over vaccine mandate in chronically understaffed department
The department has chronically been understaffed and more officers could resign over the mandate
By Emma Colton | Fox News
9/21/2021
A nearly 30-year police veteran in California resigned over San Jose’s vaccine mandate as the police force continues struggling with chronic understaffing.
“First of all, it’s my religious belief. I also believe I’ve been given a choice about what to do with my body,” Sgt. David Gutierrez said after he resigned from the San Jose Police Department this weekend, KPIX reported.
Gutierrez spent 23 years with the San Jose Police Department working as a homicide detective, internal affairs investigator and patrol supervisor, before retiring in 2019. He then returned to the force as a reserve officer.
Gutierrez worked his last shift at the department on Saturday, and said he sent a letter to the city manager on Monday denouncing the city’s vaccine mandate, which requires city employees to show proof of vaccination or get a medical exemption. Those who don’t comply face disciplinary action, such as termination.
“Disciplinary action is when you have done something wrong,” Gutierrez said, according to NBC Bay Area. “I have done nothing wrong – by making a choice not to be vaccinated why would you be disciplined?”
Gutierrez added that he is not anti-vaccine and would be open to the city testing him on a weekly basis instead of enforcing the vaccine or getting a medical exemption.
“I’m not anti-vaccine. I don’t tell people, ‘You shouldn’t get it.’ But when it comes to my body, it’s my choice about what I want to put in my body,” Gutierrez said.
He sent his resignation letter ahead of the city’s Sept. 30 deadline for employees to get the vaccine, and said more officers could also walk off the job amid the department already facing understaffing issues.
“We are already understaffed and can’t afford to lose more,” Gutierrez said.
“If they let go police officers who’ve been here five years, 10 years, 15 years, you can hire somebody else, but you’re not going to hire that experience though,” he added.
A recent audit examining the last 10 years of the police department found the force has heavily relied on overtime as it struggles with understaffing.
About 200 officers in the department have so far asked for exemptions, many of which are for religious purposes. But the Democratic mayor, Sam Liccardo, says the vaccine mandate is overall working and doesn’t anticipate an exodus from the force.
“This is certainly for the protection of the individual members of our city team. But it’s also, critically, for the safety of our entire community because we know, obviously, first responders are out there interacting [with the public] every day,” Liccardo said, according to KPIX.
Northern NY hospital to stop delivering babies after resignations over Covid-19 vaccine
BY Christine Vendel
9/12/2021
A hospital in New York plans to stop delivering babies later this month because too many maternity workers resigned rather than get the Covid-19 vaccine.
Lewis County Health System Chief Executive Officer Gerald R. Cayer announced at a news conference Friday afternoon that the maternity department would be closed on Sept. 25 until they can find enough vaccinated nurses to safely reopen it.
Cayer told reporters in Lowville, is the North Country of New York state, that seven of the 30 people who have resigned from the hospital worked in the maternity department, according to the news site NNY360.
Seven additional maternity workers have not said whether or not they will get their first vaccine shot by Sept. 27, which is the deadline set by the state for healthcare workers to get at least one shot, according to the news site.
The health system has a higher than average percentage of its staff vaccinated, Cayer told reporters, with 464 employees vaccinated out of 650, or 73 percent.
But there are still 165 employees who have not yet shared their decision with hospital management, WWNY television news reported.
Medical services in five other departments may have to be cut back as well if more staff members resign because they refuse to be vaccinated
“It just is a crazy time,” Mr. Cayer said, according to NNY360, “It’s not just LCHS-centric. Rural hospitals everywhere are really trying to figure out how we’re going to make it work.”
“If you don’t have staff, how do you deliver the service? That’s what I’m going to be talking about,” Cayer said.
The Health System is one of only two county-owned hospitals left in the state and is the largest employer in the county.
