纽约房东注意!威胁举报无证移民身份,将被视为犯罪
来源: 华人生活网
10/10/2021
注意了!不是无证移民犯罪,而是如果以此威胁或者举报,那么举报人属于犯罪。
纽约州长凯西·霍赫尔9日签署了一项立法 (S.343-A/A.3412-A),该法将某些威胁报告某人的移民身份的行为视为敲诈或胁迫。
在劳工贩卖和性贩卖案件中,威胁报告一个人的移民身份目前可被视为犯罪,但以前并未被视为潜在的勒索或胁迫犯罪。
凯西·霍赫尔表示,纽约建立在几代移民的辛勤工作和努力之上,应支持那些努力为自己和家人创造更美好生活的人们,“这项立法将保护纽约人免于因自己的移民身份而被不良行为者进行勒索或胁迫,并使我们的州更安全,免受恶意威胁和恐吓。”
这里也提醒下华人,特别是一些华人房东,疫情期间,有人面对自己的房客不交钱,会威胁对方举报对方无证客身份,虽然很多房东只是想吓吓对方。但是,现在这属于违法了!
该法案允许检察官对那些威胁他人将被递解出境的人进行起诉,即使相关案件与劳工或性交易无关。
加州、科罗拉多州、马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州也颁布了类似的措施,该立法基于公共领导研究所推荐的题为“防止敲诈移民法”的示范立法。
参议员凯普兰( Anna M. Kaplan,音译)表示,对于逃难的无证移民来说,被报告给移民及海关执法局可能意味死刑,但很多人却利用这些脆弱的人,威胁要举报他们的移民身份,以便以某种方式剥削他们。
该项立法将确保纽约移民不会受到上述卑鄙的威胁。
众议员索拉格斯( Michaelle C. Solages,音译)表示,这项立法为纽约保护无证移民的持续努力开开了新天地,“任意的递解出境的威胁对试图养家糊口和让孩子过上更好生活的纽约人极为有害,我们今天和永远与他们(无证移民)站在一起。”
文:综合星岛日报
Governor Hochul Signs Legislation Protecting Undocumented Immigrants from Threats to Report Their Immigration Status
By ANNA M. KAPLAN
10/10/2021
Legislation (S.343-A/A.3412-A) Applies the Legal Standard of Extortion or Coercion to a Person Threatening to Report Another Person’s Immigration Status
Governor Kathy Hochul today signed legislation (S.343-A/A.3412-A) classifying certain threats to report a person’s immigration status as extortion or coercion under New York law. Threats to report a person’s immigration status can currently be treated as a crime in cases of labor trafficking and sex trafficking, but were not previously treated as potential extortion or coercion offenses.
“New York is built on the hard work and determination of generations of immigrants, and we need to support people who are trying to build better lives for themselves and their families,” Governor Hochul said. “This legislation will protect New Yorkers from bad actors who use extortion or coercion due to their immigration status, and make our state safer against vile threats and intimidation.”
This bill allows prosecutors to prosecute efforts to blackmail an individual by threatening to cause deportation proceedings even when unrelated to labor or sex trafficking. Similar measures have been enacted in California, Colorado, Maryland and Virginia, and this legislation is based off model legislation recommended by The Public Leadership Institute titled “Prevent Extortion of Immigrants Act.”
Senator Anna M. Kaplan said, “For an undocumented immigrant who fled danger in their home country, being reported to ICE can be a death sentence, yet sadly, far too many people are willing to take advantage of our more vulnerable neighbors by threatening to reveal their immigration status in order to exploit them in some way. By enacting this long-overdue measure, we’re updating the laws on extortion and coercion to ensure that immigrant New Yorkers aren’t left vulnerable to such vile threats. I’m extremely grateful for Assemblymember Solages and her partnership in addressing this issue, and for Governor Hochul for ensuring that our communities are safe and protected.”
Assemblymember Michaelle C. Solages said, “This legislation breaks new ground in New York’s ongoing efforts to protect undocumented immigrants, who can be some of our state’s most vulnerable residents. I thank Governor Hochul for signing this critical reform—which will protect undocumented New Yorkers from extortion and coercion—into law. Arbitrary threats of deportation are extremely harmful to New Yorkers trying to feed their families and give their children a better life, and we stand with them, today and always.”
美国股市动荡,适于做空,如何操作?
(免费讲座 – Oct 11, Mon, 9PM EST)
请扫描海报上二维码:
或直接点击 Zoom 报名链接:
https://zoom.us/webinar/register/6316336221018/WN_yvmcDteARpGx4yjf2g3mww
诚招美国和加拿大法律服务代理
因公司发展需要,诚招美国和加拿大法律服务代理。
要求:
懂英语、或西班牙语、或法语。
能合法工作有社安号或工号。
无需改行, 可以兼职。
大学生和有销售经验优先考虑。
自雇生意公司发美国报税1099,加拿大T4A
有意了解详情, 请扫码加微信, 非诚勿扰!
Couple awarded $2.7 million after being harassed by landlord
By J.K. Dineen and Bob Egelko
9/04/2021
A state appeals court has upheld a $2.7 million judgment against a San Francisco landlord accused of terrorizing rent-controlled tenants in an effort to oust them in favor of higher-paying tenants.
Plaintiffs sued their former landlord, a limited liability corporation controlled by Anne Kihagi, charging wrongful eviction and harassment after they were forced from their longtime San Francisco apartment.
A jury found in their favor and awarded them damages that totaled $3,528,000, which the trial court later reduced to $2.7 million. The landlords appealed, and the plaintiffs cross-appealed to challenge the amended and reduced judgment.
The ruling by the First District Court of Appeal is the latest chapter in the legal battles involving Kihagi, who at one point owned 11 San Francisco apartment buildings. In 2017, a state judge ruled against the landlord in a suit filed by City Attorney Dennis Herrera, slapping her with $5.5 million in penalties.
At the time, Superior Court Judge Angela Bradstreet blasted Kihagi and her codefendants for their “persistent pattern of bad faith harassment, retaliation, and fraud” directed at renters and noted their “complete lack of understanding of the unlawfulness of their conduct.”
Duncan moved into a two-bedroom unit in a five-unit building on Hill Street in San Francisco in early 1994. Under his lease, he was responsible for gas and electric, and the landlord was responsible for water and garbage services. Duncan’s wife, Marta Munoz Mendoza, moved there in 2010, and they lived there with their daughter. They never missed or were late with a rent payment.
In May 2014 the building was sold to Zoriall LLC, whose owners included Anne Kihagi and Christina Mwangi, the latter the owner of a 27% interest, according to court documents.
Over the next 14 months the new landlords systematically made life miserable for the tenants — taking away recycling bins, refusing to fix a leaking water heater, blocking access to a laundry room and allowing power to be shut off due to unpaid bills, according to the court decision.
The landlords “ignored or delayed responding to maintenance and upkeep issues, were uncommunicative and uncooperative, and became increasingly hostile,” the court said in a 3-0 ruling.
In April 2015, the landlord filed an “owner move-in” eviction, claiming that Mwangi, who already had a nearby rental unit and owned a home, would be moving into the apartment. Duncan and Mendoza were forced to move out, renting a unit that cost three times the amount of the apartment they were evicted from. Duncan and Mendoza sued in May of that year.
The jury found the landlord had harassed tenants and had violated the state’s owner move-in law, which allows a property owner to evict rent-controlled tenants from a unit so long as the landlord uses or occupies the unit “as his or her principal residence for a period of at least 36 continuous months.”
Damages were tripled under the rent law to $3.528 million, but Superior Court Judge Andrew Cheng found the damages excessive and reduced them to $2.7 million, the amount upheld by the appeals court.
City Attorney spokesman John Coté praised the court of appeal’s ruling.
“The jury in this case came to the same conclusion that the judge did in our case: that Ms. Kihagi and her accomplices unlawfully harassed and evicted tenants. We’re pleased that the Court of Appeal has now affirmed both of these cases. The people of San Francisco have had enough of Ms. Kihagi’s lies, predatory practices, and legal trickery.”
旧金山夫妇遭房东骚扰逼迁 获赔270万
9/04/2021
三藩市一對租住單位逾廿年的夫婦,遭房東多番恐嚇以圖提高租金。租客夫婦早前提訴獲判賠償270萬元,房東不服上訴,上訴庭三名法官判上訴無效,維持原判。
《三藩市紀事報》報道,鄧肯(Dale Duncan)和妻子門多薩(Marta Munoz Mendoza)數年前被迫遷離居住逾廿年的三藩市一間公寓後入稟法院,提告前房東、一間由女子基哈吉(Anne Kihagi)控制的有限責任公司非法逼遷和騷擾。
原訴法官判鄧肯夫婦勝訴,可獲被告賠償逾352萬元,後來法院調低賠償金額至270萬元。房東不服上訴,鄧肯夫婦也反上訴挑戰經修改和賠償減少的裁決。
這是於三藩市一度持有11間公寓的基哈吉面對的訴訟戰最新發展。市府律師赫雷拉(Dennis Herrera) 2017年提告基哈吉,一名州法官最後判基哈吉敗訴,需罰款550萬元。
當時女法官布拉德斯特里特(Angela Bradstreet)批評基哈吉和同案被告持續對租客作出惡意騷擾、報復和欺詐,又提到兩名被告「完全缺乏理解他們行為的不合法性」。
案情指,鄧肯1994年初租住三藩市Hill街一座五單位物業其中的兩房單位。根據租約,鄧肯負責天然氣和電費,房東負責水費和垃圾費。鄧肯妻子門多薩2010年遷入,後來與女兒同住,從未逾期交租或欠租。
物業2014年5月賣予基哈吉和姆旺吉(Christina Mwangi)等人持有的Zoriall LLC後出現變化。法庭文件顯示,姆旺吉持有該公司27%股份。
裁決指,新房東隨後14個月有系統破壞租客生活,包括拿走回收箱、拒修漏水熱水爐、阻止使用洗衣房和不付電費導致停電。
法院指,房東「無視或拖延維修保養,又不肯溝通和不合作,越來越敵視他人」。鄧肯夫婦只好搬離原單位,以原單位租金的三倍價錢租住另一單位。房東2015年4月提出「業主自住」驅逐通知,稱當時已租住附近單位和有屋的姆旺吉將搬入公寓。鄧肯夫婦同年5月入稟。
陪審團認為房東一直騷擾租客,又違反加州業主自住的法規。
賠償金額起初依租務法例增加兩倍至352萬8000元,但高院法官鄭元松(Andrew Cheng)認為金額過高,將金額調低至270萬元,並獲上訴庭判維持賠償額。