众院点名辉瑞、礼来等药厂「垄断市场」牟取暴利




众院点名辉瑞、礼来等药厂「垄断市场」牟取暴利

世界新闻网 

12/13/2021

众院监督委员会报告指控辉瑞、礼来等一些大型药厂,针对特定药品在美国市场牟取暴利。(Getty Images)

众院监督委员会(House Oversight Committee)日前公布一项报告,指控一些大型药厂如辉瑞(Pfizer)、礼来(Eli Lilly)、诺德(Novo Nordisk)和法国的赛诺菲(Sanofi),针对特定药品在美国市场牟取暴利;甚至微调某些药物的成分,重新包装后以更高的价格出售。

靠特定药赚数十亿

该报告指出,由辉瑞研发的神经止痛药利瑞卡(Lyrica)专利即将到期,但该公司多年来通过订价和行销策略,靠着该药物赚取数十亿元的利润。



此外,礼来、诺德和赛诺菲更长期主导胰岛素在美国的市场;该药物自1920年代研发,是用来维持糖尿病患者性命的关键药物,而这些药厂的胰岛素市占率就高达九成。

根据报告,礼来的胰岛素用药优泌乐(Humalog)自上市以来涨幅最高,至今每瓶价格已涨价1219%;诺德研发的NovoLog涨幅则是627%;赛诺菲的兰德仕(Lantus)涨幅也有715%。

不过这些药厂坚持,巨额利润是为了弥补研发的高额成本;但经过研究团队三年的调查,「委员会发现药厂们口中所谓『重大研发的高额成本』,其实是用来扩大他们在市场上垄断的势力,开发更多元的行销策略,并打压竞争对手」。



由拜登政府提出的「重建美好未来法案」(Build Back Better Act)中,将允许政府对特定药物与药厂协商价格;众院监督委员会主席马隆尼(Carolyn Maloney)说:「我们发现这些药厂蓄意在美国提高售价,由其是那些不属于联邦医疗保险协商规范的药物;事实上,这些药物在全球市场的售价更低。」

礼来的发言人声称已为糖尿病患者提供折扣;赛诺菲发言人则指自家胰岛素从2014年至今降价达45%;诺德质疑这份报告低估了药厂过去为抑制药价所做的努力。

旧药新装卖更高价

此外,该报告还指辉瑞对利瑞卡使用「药品跳级」的手法,亦即只有微幅调整配方内容的比例,却以新申请的专利引导患者换药,从中赚取更高的利润。

利瑞卡于2004年上市,至今涨幅高达420%;光是2019年,利瑞卡的总销售额为20亿元。

Source



莫德纳承认疫苗引发心肌炎风险五倍于辉瑞

韩国中央日报

11/11/2021

莫德纳的新冠肺炎疫苗。【照片来源:韩联社】

莫德纳承认年轻男性接种本公司的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫苗后发生心肌炎的风险较高,但强调完成接种本公司疫苗后的“突破感染”情况较少,称接种本公司疫苗的效果大于副作用风险。

11月11日(当地时间),美国CNBC消息称,莫德纳首席医学官(CMO)保罗·伯顿在电话中对记者们表示,“30岁以下男性接种莫德纳疫苗后发生心肌炎的风险确实高于辉瑞疫苗”。莫德纳和辉瑞疫苗都是mRNA(信使核酸)类型的疫苗。

莫德纳首席医疗官Paul Burton引用法国的统计数据介绍了罕见副作用心肌炎的发生频率,称统计显示,接种莫德纳疫苗的12至29岁男性中,每10万人发生心肌炎的情况共13.3起,而辉瑞疫苗每10万人只有2.7起。



实际上,虽然欧洲今年7月已批准将莫德纳疫苗用于青少年接种,但芬兰和瑞典等北欧国家因为心肌炎风险高,已停止对30岁以下男性接种该疫苗。

不过,Burton引用美国疾控中心(CDC)的统计强调称,“莫德纳疫苗接种者出现新冠肺炎突破感染的比例低于辉瑞和杨森疫苗接种者”。

他补充说,“把剂量减少一半接种加强针的莫德纳疫苗接种者中,还没有出现任何心肌炎病例”,“公司将继续观察情况”。

医学界有看法认为,莫德纳疫苗引发心肌炎的风险相对高于其他疫苗,原因可能在于睾酮等荷尔蒙问题。此外还有看法认为,莫德纳疫苗的mRNA含量比辉瑞疫苗高,也是一个原因。

Source



Moderna says Covid vaccine has fewer breakthrough cases than Pfizer’s, but higher myocarditis rates in young men

By Berkeley Lovelace Jr.

11/11/2021

KEY POINTS

  • Moderna defended the use of its Covid vaccine, saying the protection it offers against severe disease, hospitalization and death outweighs the risk of myocarditis.
  • Reported cases of the rare heart inflammation in men under 30 are relatively higher after Moderna’s vaccine compared with Pfizer’s, said Chief Medical Officer Dr. Paul Burton.
  • However, he also touted data from the CDC that showed the rates of mild or severe disease from Covid were lower in Moderna recipients.
Vials with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine labels are seen in this illustration picture taken March 19, 2021.
Dado Ruvic | Reuters

Moderna defended the use of its Covid-19 vaccine Thursday, saying the protection it offers against severe disease, hospitalization and death outweighs the risk of myocarditis, a rare heart condition seen in a small number of young men who received the shot.

The company announced last week that the Food and Drug Administration needed more time to decide whether to authorize its two-dose vaccine for use in children ages 12 to 17 as the agency looks into reports of myocarditis, or the inflammation of the heart muscle.


Reported cases of the rare heart inflammation in men under age 30 are relatively higher after Moderna’s vaccine compared with those who received the shots made by Pfizer and BioNTech, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Dr. Paul Burton told reporters on a call Thursday.


Burton cited data from France on males ages 12 to 29. It showed there were 13.3 cases of myocarditis per 100,000 people for Moderna’s vaccine compared with 2.7 cases per 100,000 people for the Pfizer vaccine.

However, he also touted data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that showed the rates of mild or severe disease from Covid were lower in Moderna recipients than in those who received Pfizer’s or Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. For example, there were 86 breakthrough cases per 100,000 people for the Moderna vaccine. That compares to 135 breakthrough cases per 100,000 for Pfizer’s, he said.



The data also showed unvaccinated people have an elevenfold increased risk of dying compared with those who have gotten the shots.

“While I think health authorities are carefully assessing the data, being appropriately cautious, you can see that they continue to recommend the use of the mRNA-1273 Moderna vaccine,” he said on the call. “We believe that the balance of benefit and risk is extremely positive,” he added.

More than 71 million Americans are fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine, according to data compiled by the CDC.

Europe approved Moderna’s vaccine for use in adolescents in July. However, some countries, such as Finland and Sweden, have since paused the vaccine’s use in people 30 and younger due to concerns about myocarditis.



Scientists are still trying to figure out why young men experience the heart condition after vaccination, but some hypothesize hormones may play a role, specifically testosterone, as well as the fact that Moderna’s vaccine uses a higher dosage of mRNA than Pfizer’s, Burton said.

“I do think this hypothesis of testosterone is important,” Burton said. “We know that there is indeed some inflammation associated with testosterone. … We do have in the primary series, as you know, 100 micrograms of mRNA, so we have slightly higher levels of spike protein, and that could be a contributing factor as well.”

Burton said the company has not seen any cases of myocarditis in those who received its booster shot, which is half the dosage of its primary series of shots. He said the company will continue to monitor for cases. The reported cases of myocarditis are generally mild with symptoms usually resolving on their own, he said.

Source



Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries/Deaths

11/06/2021

Rumble — Roundtable discussion with vaccine injured and medical experts on federal vaccine mandates and the importance of health care freedom.


美国陆军飞行医官特蕾莎中校关于新冠疫苗的证词

By 萧笙客 

11/06/2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tpIjfff49g

11月2日,飞行医官特蕾莎·朗中校在约翰逊参议员主持的关于新冠疫苗的圆桌会议上的作证。

美国德州胡德堡陆军基地负责四千名陆军飞行旅官兵身体健康和飞行安全的军医特蕾莎反对对官兵、特别是飞行员强制性注射疫苗,向法院提出的临时禁令书写的补充材料。

Source



Sen. Johnson hosts panel highlighting people claiming to be harmed by COVID-19 vaccines

By WEAU 13 News

11/06/2021

Sen. Ron Johnson held a roundtable with several people who say they or a loved one experienced life-altering side-effects from various COVID vaccinations Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2021.(Gray TV)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (WEAU) – Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson is giving a stage to people who claim they were harmed by COVID-19 vaccinations.

Tuesday, Johnson held a roundtable with several people who say they or a loved one experienced life-altering side-effects from various COVID vaccinations.

One panelist, who says she experienced adverse side effects from the vaccine, called for a federal safety net for others who are also injured.

Another woman at the meeting claimed that those who catch COVID receive medical help, while those who have adverse side effects to vaccines are ignored.

The panel included researches and doctors who generally agreed vaccines have a role in fighting the pandemic, but also cautioned against mandating them.

Johnson said the panel is not about creating fear or increasing vaccine hesitancy, but says federal health officials aren’t being honest when they say the vaccines are safe and effective, and shouldn’t be mandated.



“I had COVID,” Johnson said. “I’ve had my antibodies tested as my doctor told me. I’ve got a whopping level of antibodies.”

Johnson also spoke about his personal vaccination decision.

“Again, natural immunity should be strong, pretty long-lasting, which is the case of very, you know, many, many illnesses, many viruses,” Johnson said. “And so there’s no reason for me to get a vaccine.”

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fact page maintains the vaccines are safe and effective. It also acknowledges the existence of some of the adverse effects discussed at Johnson’s roundtable, and says COVID vaccines are under the most intense safety monitoring in U.S. history.

Source


Survey: Majority of Federal Employees Disagree With Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

Comments submitted as part of the survey show a diversity of thought on the requirement. 

By COURTNEY BUBLÉ

he majority of federal employees recently surveyed (53%) strongly or somewhat disagreed with the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, while 44% strongly or somewhat agreed with it. 

The Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive, sent a survey between October 27 and November 2 to Government Executive and Defense One readers, which drew 3,186 respondents. The survey had a 95% confidence level and margin of error of +/- 3%; the vast majority of respondents currently work for a federal agency but the results did include some retirees and congressional and private sector workers. President Biden announced the mandate on September 9 and the deadline is November 22. 

“I am not pro or anti-vaccine, I am pro-choice,” wrote one federal employee in the comments section. “It should be a choice not a mandate, last I knew this was a free country.” Anonymous comments submitted as part of the survey show the diversity of thought on the mandate as well as the nuance of arguments on both sides. 


Thirty-percent of respondents said they thought the vaccine mandate will be slightly or moderately effective in protecting the federal workforce from the coronavirus; 42% thought it will be very or extremely effective and 29% thought it will not be effective. 

“The vaccine mandate is most likely legal. It’s also probably effective,” said a respondent. “It, however, does not mean the federal [government] should have the power to force adults and the civilian workforce to get a shot that they don’t want.” 

The mandate requires all federal employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19 by November 22, or claim a religious or medical exemption. Those who decline vaccination and whose agencies deny their exemption requests will face progressive discipline, up to removal from the federal service. 

Another respondent said, “the mandate will not be effective if the many false religious exemptions are approved,” because “most are not sincerely held beliefs, but just people that don’t want to get their vaccine.”



A different person said, “A coworker’s choice not to be vaccinated increases my potential exposure to COVID, potentially increases my workload if I have to cover for them if they are out ill and increases the cost of [Federal Employees Health Benefits]/Medicare.”

The survey looked at the difference of views among those on full telework compared to those going into the office at least one day a week. The chart below shows approval and disapproval levels based on that status, with those going into the office at least once a week more likely to strongly disapprove of the mandate. 

“If you can do your job, i.e. telework, without contacting others there is no reason to be vaccinated,” said one federal employee in the comments section. “It is the individual’s body and they should have the right to decide what is done to it without fearing economic ruin.”

Another said, “​​I worked and put the protocols in to keep everyone safe. I worked on the front lines for the last two years and now you want to fire me?”



One respondent who said they work for the Agriculture Department’s Farm Service Agency said they love their job and customers they serve, “but lately I do not feel the agency has my back or appreciates the work our agency does. After being on the front lines, figuring out telework, changing the way our agency goals are achieved I feel the employees deserve a little more than a ‘do it or get out policy.’ ” 

As for the ability to enforce a vaccine mandate, 50% of respondents strongly or somewhat disagreed that the federal government has the authority to enforce the requirement, while 46% somewhat or strongly agreed. There were no major differences in responses from managers and non-managers to this question; however, there were some differences among those in different work environments, as shown below. 

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a legal opinion in July that says federal law doesn’t prohibit public and private entities from mandating coronavirus vaccines, even if those vaccines do not yet have full authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Also, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a similar decision in May, which it updated in October

As for regions, the area with the highest approval rating (54%) of the mandate was the D.C. metro area, which is where federal agency headquarters are concentrated. Respondents living in the Southwest had the highest disapproval rating. 



“The D.C. power brokers are using us as pawns,” said a respondent. 

While not a question in the survey, many raised concerns in the comments section about loss of employees due to the mandate. 

“Is the federal government prepared to lose 20-30% of its workforce to retirements, resignations or terminations?” said one respondent. 

“I will retire from federal service if I am threatened with discipline/firing,” said another. “ I am proud of my military service (Vietnam veteran) and federal service (FBI and [Internal Revenue Service]) and continually received ‘outstanding’ performance evals as GS-14. The federal mandate is morally wrong.” 

Someone else said, “this is a train wreck, but may provide promotion opportunities for the younger workforce.” 

However, there were also several comments encouraging vaccinations. “I sincerely appreciate efforts to get our team vaccinated,” said one person. “I am grateful for the mandate and wish it had come sooner.”

For comparison, recent survey from Qualtrics, an experience management company, found that the majority of respondents (58%) supported vaccine mandates from either employers or the federal government. 



“Employees in the [technology and information technology] industry are the most supportive of federal vaccine mandates compared to those who work in health care, retail and government,” said Qualtrics. “Roughly a quarter of government, health care, and private employees oppose mandates that would apply to them.” 

Overall, 42% of respondents want their company leaders to enforce the mandate, while 39% do not, the Qualtrics survey found. That survey was done between October 12 and 15. There were 1,309 respondents who were chosen from a randomized panel and deemed eligible if they live in the United States, are an adult and are at least part-time employees. 

Government Executive previously reported about reactions to the mandate from NASAFederal Bureau of Prisons and other federal employees. While some agencies have shared their vaccination levels with reporters, lawmakers or the public, the levels are not known for all. Top House Republicans are seeking those numbers by November 10. 

In one example, as of late October, several intelligence agencies had at least 20% of their workforce unvaccinated, with some as high as 40%, said Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, who is a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Associated Press reported on Friday. He cited information that the Biden administration gave to the committee, but hasn’t released publicly, and didn’t name the specific agencies since the full results were classified. 

Source



Biden admin considering vaccine mandate for businesses with fewer than 100 employees

OSHA rule for big businesses forces employees to be vaccinated or wear masks and get weekly COVID-19 tests

By Tyler Olson | FOX Business

11/05/2021

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is “seeking comment” about whether businesses with fewer than 100 employees should be subject to the COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandate it is implementing on big businesses

OSHA’s requirement will force businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccines or else their employees will need to wear masks and be tested for COVID-19 weekly. It will go into effect Jan. 4. 

President Biden holds his face mask and waves as he exits Air Force One at Capital Region International Airport, Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2021, in Lansing, Michigan. Biden’s administration is implementing a COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandate on big busines (AP Photo/Evan Vucci / AP Newsroom)

But according to a summary released by OSHA, it appears to be considering implementing the rule for small businesses as well. 



“OSHA is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly, but is less confident that smaller employers can do so without undue disruption,” the summary says. “OSHA needs additional time to assess the capacity of smaller employers, and is seeking comment to help the agency make that determination.”

The same language is included in the Federal Register page for the vaccine rule.

In this July 27, 2020, file photo, nurse Kathe Olmstead prepares a shot that is part of a possible COVID-19 vaccine, developed by the National Institutes of Health and Moderna Inc., in Binghamton, New York. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink / AP Images)

A Department of Labor spokesperson told FOX Business Friday that it is indeed considering whether to extend the vaccine or mask and testing mandate to businesses with fewer than 100 workers. 



“OSHA chose a 100-employees threshold at this time because the agency is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly,” the spokesperson said. “Because the emergency situation required OSHA to act quickly, the information immediately available to the agency did not allow it to confidently assess the impact on smaller firms.”

The spokesperson added: “OSHA will consider whether to extend the rule to smaller firms in the public rulemaking that begins with the publication of this emergency rule.”

Source



Raytheon CEO warns company could lose ‘several thousand’ employees over vaccine mandate

By Mike Brest

10/27/2021

Raytheon CEO warns company could lose ‘several thousand’ employees over vaccine mandate

Raytheon Technologies’s top boss warned that the U.S. aerospace and defense company will lose thousands of employees who have thus far refused to comply with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

“So, we’re going to be faced on Dec. 8 with a choice. We’re going to potentially lose several thousand people who refuse to be vaccinated,” Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday. “Now, this is a tough thing, but we are preparing for it.”



Hayes also said that 83% of the company, which has a total workforce of roughly 125,000 U.S. employees, according to Reuters, is already vaccinated while another 6% are “in the process of being vaccinated.”

Additionally, there is another 3% of employees who are seeking either a religious or medical exemption, while another 3% have said they don’t intend to receive the vaccine, the CEO added, though he did not address the status of the employees who do not fall into those categories.

The company has already begun hiring people to fill the upcoming vacancies, Hayes said.

Raytheon had issued a companywide mandate requiring vaccination by Jan. 1, but that order was usurped when President Joe Biden declared that all federal contractors must receive the vaccine by Dec. 8.



Hayes’s comments came the same day Alabama Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville sent a letter to the White House claiming that Biden’s “federal contractor vaccine mandate will have negative effects on our national security” and called on the president “to remove — or, at a minimum, delay and clarify — vaccination requirements on private companies and academic research institutions that are actively supporting the Department of Defense.”

Similarly, nearly a dozen Republican lawmakers on the House Armed Services Committee petitioned the White House and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to reverse the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate for contractors over fears that it could lead to supply chain issues.

Roughly 100 employees at United Launch Alliance, a Lockheed Martin and Boeing joint venture that contracts to both the Pentagon and NASA, walked off the job Monday over the federal government’s vaccine mandates and pledged to continue protesting in the days leading up to the deadline to be vaccinated.

Source



Former WSU football coach Nick Rolovich to sue university over firing after refusing vaccine

According to a press release sent by his attorney, Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior.”

By KREM Staff

10/20/2021

PULLMAN, Wash. — Former Washington State University football coach Nick Rolovich was fired Tuesday, Oct. 19 after refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and now he plans to sue the university. 

According to his lawyer, Rolovich will be taking legal action against WSU and all parties responsible for his termination. The decision to terminate Rolovich came after his request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the WSU. According to his lawyer, WSU  “indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made.”

Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior,” according to the statement from his lawyer, Brian Fahling.

“Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired,” Fahling says. “Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation.”



In the statement, Fahling says, “Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Rolovich and his family. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”

Pope Francis, the leader of the Catholic Church, has encouraged people to get the COVID-19 vaccine. 

Here is the statement from Rolovich’s lawyer in full:

“The termination of Washington State football coach Nick Rolovich on Monday was unjust and unlawful. 

It came after Coach Rolovich’s request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the University. The institution also indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made. As a result, Coach Rolovich will be taking legal action against Washington State University, and all parties responsible for his illegal termination. 



Immediately after terminating Coach Rolovich, WSU Athletic Director, Pat Chun, directed campus police to escort the coach to his car, he wasn’t allowed into his office, and he was not even allowed to speak to his team. Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired. Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation. 

Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Coach Rolovich and his family. Furthermore, the University’s deceitfulness about being unable to accommodate Coach Rolovich even if his religious exemption request had been granted, is exemplified by Chun’s actions arranging a “secret” donor trip that he had Coach Rolovich attend at the height of the pandemic in July 2020. 

During that excursion, Chun and other attendees contracted the disease, but Coach Rolovich did not. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Coach Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”

KREM has reached out to WSU for a statement but has not yet received a response.

Source



320万年薪傲视全州公务员 华盛顿州立大学教练拒打疫苗遭开除

10/20/2021

华盛顿州立大学(Washington State University, WSU)足球队总教练罗洛维奇(Nick Rolovich)因拒绝遵守华州要求公务员必须接种新冠疫苗的规定,本周稍早已被开除。美联社

华盛顿州立大学(Washington State University,WSU)足球队总教练罗洛维奇(Nick Rolovich)年薪320万元,在领取州政府薪水的公务员收入排行榜称霸。但因罗洛维奇拒绝遵守华州要求公务员必须接种新冠疫苗的规定,本周稍早已被开除。华盛顿邮报报导,罗洛维奇堪称到目前为止,最为引人注目的公职人员拒打疫苗而丢饭碗案例。

华盛顿州立大学18日宣布已经解聘罗洛维奇。华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队(Washington State Cougars)体育主任秦派特(Pat Chun,音译)指出,罗洛维奇拒绝配合疫苗接种规定,已经失去获得校方聘用的资格。

秦派特在声明中说,这起事件让学校足球队感到沮丧。

42岁的罗洛维奇出身于夏威夷大学(University of Hawaii)足球队,2019年曾获西部山区联盟(Mountain West Conference)最佳教练。罗洛维奇年薪320万元,是领取华州州政府薪水的公务员当中排行最高者。



罗洛维奇今年暑假已经表明坚决不打疫苗,太平洋十二校联盟(Pacific-12 Conference)在洛杉矶举办媒体宣传,由于规定全体出席者必须打疫苗,罗洛维奇便因此缺席。

秦派特指出,校方与罗洛维奇协商长达数月,但罗洛维奇态度坚定,「他有权做出选择,他的决定就是不配合规定」。

华盛顿州立大学校长薛尔兹(Kirk Schulz)则在声明中说,虽然少数人士拒打疫苗而引发轩然大波,但学校接近90%雇员及97%学生则都打了疫苗。

薛尔兹说:「人们可以做选择,而且有好几个月的时间可以决定。这并不是突然发生的。」

除了罗洛维奇之外,华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队另外四名助理教练罗戈(Ricky Logo)、理查森(John Richardson)、史特兹曼(Craig Stutzmann)、韦伯(Mark Weber),同样因为拒打疫苗,一并遭到开除。

Source



美国ESPN知名体育记者拒打疫苗被开除

本文源自: 金融界网

10/20/2021

  迪士尼旗下娱乐与体育节目电视网(ESPN)的知名记者艾莉森-威廉姆斯(Allison Williams)周一表示,她因为拒绝接种新冠病毒疫苗而被解雇,下周将是她在这里工作的的最后日子。

  这位明星记者最出名的是她对美国大学橄榄球和篮球比赛的报道,她在社交媒体上的一段视频中说,她要求豁免不接种疫苗的请求被拒绝了。

  威廉姆斯从2011年3月开始为ESPN工作。上个月,她在推特上发表声明称,在咨询了医生后,她拒绝接种疫苗,因为她和她的丈夫正试图生第二个孩子,接种疫苗“不符合我的最佳利益”。

  ESPN的母公司迪士尼是众多要求员工接种疫苗的企业之一。该公司在一份声明中说,不会对威廉姆斯的个案置评。迪士尼表示,公司正在按照其法律义务,处理员工提出的豁免要求。

Source



ESPN’s Allison Williams explains why she’s giving up her job over a vaccine mandate

By ANDREA HSU

10/20/2021

ESPN reporter Allison Williams reports from a college basketball tournament at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., on March 8, 2017. Williams said in a recent Instagram video that she is leaving ESPN due to the company’s vaccine mandate.
Lance King/Getty Images

ESPN college basketball and football reporter Allison Williams has joined a small minority of workers who have quit or been fired from their jobs over a vaccine mandate.

“I have been denied my request for accommodation by ESPN and the Walt Disney Company, and effective next week, I will be separated from the company,” she said in a video posted to Instagram on Friday.

ESPN’s parent company, Disney, had announced a vaccine mandate over the summer with a deadline of this Friday, Oct. 22.



In early September, Williams shared on Twitter that she’d decided not to get a COVID-19 vaccine while she and her husband were trying to have a second child.

“Taking the vaccine at this time is not in my interest,” she wrote.

The CDC has urged people who are pregnant or might become pregnant to get vaccinated, saying there is currently no evidence showing COVID-19 vaccines cause fertility problems and no data pointing to an increased risk of miscarriage among people who received an mRNA vaccine during pregnancy.

In the Instagram video, Williams spoke of her medical apprehensions about receiving the vaccine and added, “I am also so morally and ethically not aligned with this.”



“Ultimately, I cannot put a paycheck over principle, and I will not sacrifice something that I believe and hold so strongly to maintain a career,” she said in the video. “I’m going to pray things get better and that I can see you on the television set in some capacity in some stadium, covering some game soon.”

Williams, who had reported for ESPN since 2011, acknowledged she’s not the only one walking away from a career or a profession they love.

Hundreds of hospital workers have quit rather than get vaccinated, but they represent only a tiny fraction of employees overall. For example, Duke Health in North Carolina reported it had fired just 20 people out of a workforce of 23,000.

Meanwhile, United Airlines said it is terminating a couple of hundred of its 67,000 employees who did not comply with the airline’s vaccine mandate. Other employers that have imposed vaccine mandates are also reporting compliance rates topping 90%.

Source




北美法律公益讲座安排

时间:周二到周五 晚间
5:30-7:00(西部时间)8:30-9:30(东部时间)

周二:如何准备遗嘱材料(遗嘱workshop)

周三:数据泄露和个人身份保护&事业机会说明会

周四:家庭法和婚姻法(周律师)

周五:人身伤害和索赔(朱律师)

Zoom:6045004698,密码:请私信或群里@我

另外:周三6:30(西部时间)

专题:99%华人移民不知道的法律问题(粤语专场)

Zoom 95190929213,密码:私信或群里@我



Veteran police officer resigns over vaccine mandate in chronically understaffed department

The department has chronically been understaffed and more officers could resign over the mandate

By Emma Colton | Fox News

9/21/2021

A nearly 30-year police veteran in California resigned over San Jose’s vaccine mandate as the police force continues struggling with chronic understaffing. 

“First of all, it’s my religious belief. I also believe I’ve been given a choice about what to do with my body,” Sgt. David Gutierrez said after he resigned from the San Jose Police Department this weekend, KPIX reported

Gutierrez spent 23 years with the San Jose Police Department working as a homicide detective, internal affairs investigator and patrol supervisor, before retiring in 2019. He then returned to the force as a reserve officer. 



Gutierrez worked his last shift at the department on Saturday, and said he sent a letter to the city manager on Monday denouncing the city’s vaccine mandate, which requires city employees to show proof of vaccination or get a medical exemption. Those who don’t comply face disciplinary action, such as termination.

“Disciplinary action is when you have done something wrong,” Gutierrez said, according to NBC Bay Area. “I have done nothing wrong – by making a choice not to be vaccinated why would you be disciplined?”

Gutierrez added that he is not anti-vaccine and would be open to the city testing him on a weekly basis instead of enforcing the vaccine or getting a medical exemption. 



“I’m not anti-vaccine. I don’t tell people, ‘You shouldn’t get it.’ But when it comes to my body, it’s my choice about what I want to put in my body,” Gutierrez said.

He sent his resignation letter ahead of the city’s Sept. 30 deadline for employees to get the vaccine, and said more officers could also walk off the job amid the department already facing understaffing issues. 

“We are already understaffed and can’t afford to lose more,” Gutierrez said.

“If they let go police officers who’ve been here five years, 10 years, 15 years, you can hire somebody else, but you’re not going to hire that experience though,” he added.



A recent audit examining the last 10 years of the police department found the force has heavily relied on overtime as it struggles with understaffing. 

About 200 officers in the department have so far asked for exemptions, many of which are for religious purposes. But the Democratic mayor, Sam Liccardo, says the vaccine mandate is overall working and doesn’t anticipate an exodus from the force. 

“This is certainly for the protection of the individual members of our city team. But it’s also, critically, for the safety of our entire community because we know, obviously, first responders are out there interacting [with the public] every day,” Liccardo said, according to KPIX.

Source



Northern NY hospital to stop delivering babies after resignations over Covid-19 vaccine

BY Christine Vendel 

9/12/2021

A hospital in New York plans to stop delivering babies later this month because too many maternity workers resigned rather than get the Covid-19 vaccine.

Lewis County Health System Chief Executive Officer Gerald R. Cayer announced at a news conference Friday afternoon that the maternity department would be closed on Sept. 25 until they can find enough vaccinated nurses to safely reopen it.

Cayer told reporters in Lowville, is the North Country of New York state, that seven of the 30 people who have resigned from the hospital worked in the maternity department, according to the news site NNY360.



Seven additional maternity workers have not said whether or not they will get their first vaccine shot by Sept. 27, which is the deadline set by the state for healthcare workers to get at least one shot, according to the news site.

The health system has a higher than average percentage of its staff vaccinated, Cayer told reporters, with 464 employees vaccinated out of 650, or 73 percent.

But there are still 165 employees who have not yet shared their decision with hospital management, WWNY television news reported.

Medical services in five other departments may have to be cut back as well if more staff members resign because they refuse to be vaccinated



“It just is a crazy time,” Mr. Cayer said, according to NNY360, “It’s not just LCHS-centric. Rural hospitals everywhere are really trying to figure out how we’re going to make it work.”

“If you don’t have staff, how do you deliver the service? That’s what I’m going to be talking about,” Cayer said.

The Health System is one of only two county-owned hospitals left in the state and is the largest employer in the county.

Source