By Drew Wilder
A new study of Fairfax County students’ grades shows a growing divide between two extremes. Students who had high grades before the pandemic are doing even better than expected, while students who were already struggling are now doing worse.
While some students are thriving, there are significantly more failing grades during distance learning compared to last year, the Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) report found.
“We are seeing slips in all my kids’ grades, interestingly,” said Megan Jaster, who has a son in special education. She says distance learning has been more difficult for him than her other kids.
“I’ve had to quit work just to sit by him and help him access anything that is up on the computer,” Jaster said.
The research shows Jaster’s situation is common throughout Fairfax County.
More FCPS Students Are Failing Their Classes Compared to Last Year
Percentages of all FCPS middle and high school students with marks of F in 2 or more classes in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019.
| Q1 2019 | Q1 2020 | % Increase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle School | 2% | 8% | 300% |
| Students with Disabilities | 9% | 19% | 111% |
| English Learner Students | 17% | 35% | 106% |
| Male Students | 7% | 14% | 100% |
| Female Students | 4% | 8% | 100% |
| Asian Students | 2% | 4% | 100% |
| Hispanic Students | 13% | 25% | 92% |
| Economically Disadvantaged Students | 12% | 22% | 83% |
| White Students | 3% | 5% | 67% |
| Black Students | 8% | 13% | 63% |
| High School | 8% | 12% | 50% |
Students with 2 or more failing grades during the first quarter last year are failing even more classes this year – up to 83% across all students.
Failing grades for English language learners are up 106%. Students in special education are struggling the most, with failing grades increasing by 111%.
“When things get hard, a lot of these kids who struggle anyway just give up very easily,” Jaster said. “I find my special needs kid, if I step away, will just not engage anymore.”
Other parents have noticed their kids excelling during distance learning. In fact, the study found the majority of Fairfax County students are doing slightly better than expected.
Diane Cooper-Gould is one of those parents. She says her kids have been doing “really well in terms of grades” this school year.
Overall, 61% of students in high school and middle school are overperforming in English and 65% are overperforming in math, compared to what FCPS was expecting.
Percent of Students Under or Overperforming in English, Compared to Predicted Performance
FCPS says there’s reason for concern because the results of the report “indicate a widening gap between students who were previously performing satisfactorily and those performing unsatisfactorily.”
Superintendent Scott Brabrand says FCPS is now identifying the students doing much worse than expected and working on specific interventions to help them.
Cooper-Gould said, “It’s my feeling that this is something we’re going to have to address as a society, not just one school system.”
How President-Elect Joe Biden Proposes To Change Housing Policies
Nov 9, 2020
By Natalie Campisi – Forbes Staff
Housing was not a major talking point in the 2020 election, but President-elect Joe Biden devised a blueprint to tackle major housing issues nonetheless.
The sweeping $640 billion, 10-year plan addresses everything from affordable housing to anti-discrimination policies.
Some commentators have called it a “comprehensive plan” for housing, while others say Biden is throwing big money at real problems without offering practical solutions.
Either way, Biden’s housing plan is likely just a wish list unless the Democrats can wrangle control of the Senate. Senate control comes down to two Georgia runoff elections on Jan. 5. If the Republicans keep control, Congress will remain divided, which will make it harder for Biden to push through his housing agenda.
This article is based on known Biden proposals to:
- Expand the housing choice voucher program
- Require states receiving government money to plan for affordable housing units
- Reinstate an Obama-era rule requiring communities to create a plan to mitigate discriminatory housing practices
Biden Housing Overview: Expand Affordable Housing
Biden’s plans earmark billions of dollars to provide fair and affordable housing for middle-class families and the poorest Americans. All in all, Biden’s housing policy proposals would cost $640 billion over 10 years, although he has not detailed where any of this funding would come from.
The Biden plan would put $100 billion into an “Affordable Housing Fund,” the bulk of which ($65 billion) would provide incentives to develop and rehabilitate low-cost housing where there’s a shortage.
“These funds will be directed toward communities that are suffering from an affordability crisis and are willing to implement new zoning laws that encourage more affordable housing,” according to Biden’s plan.
Biden’s Plans Would Boost Section 8 Availability
The plan also calls to expand the Section 8 housing choice voucher program, the largest federal housing program for low-income renters. Biden would make Section 8 an entitlement, thus ensuring vouchers to all eligible people.
Currently, only 1 in 5 eligible households receive assistance, with waiting times pushing two years in some places. Some 2 million households receive Section 8 vouchers, but that’s not enough to meet demand.
“Expanding vouchers to all those eligible will need to be matched with a strong, national measure to include ‘source of income’ as a protected class under fair housing law,” says Miriam Axel-Lute, editor of Shelterforce, a nonprofit publication published by the National Housing Institute.
In addition, Axel-Lute says, reducing exclusionary zoning policies, which ban construction of multi-family homes, would expand the home selection for families with vouchers.
Biden also would push for a law that would ban discrimination against tenants who use Section 8 vouchers or receive other federal housing benefits.
Biden Would Restore Fair Housing Rules
Biden has pledged to reinstate the Obama administration’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule. The Trump administration only recently terminated the rule, which required towns and cities that received HUD funding to create plans to eliminate housing discrimination in their localities.
Critics of AFFH have said there were too many hoops to jump through in order to get funding, while proponents have defended the initiative as being an integral step in promoting fair housing policies.
Maintaining the Obama-era rule would help push forward housing equity, says Bruce Dorpalen, executive director of the National Housing Resource Center.
“Biden’s proposal shows that there is institutional racism and biases we need to change. If we want to reestablish the Black middle class in this country, homeownership has to be part of that,” Dorpalen says. ”The Biden housing platform has that built-in.”
President Trump has falsely stated that the AFFH rule would have “required high-density zoning, eliminated single-family zoning, and destroyed our suburbs.” The rule does not mandate any particular solution to discrimination or unfair practices; it just requires that each community identify the problems and come up with a workable solution.
Solomon Greene, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, a Washington D.C.-based think tank, says that AFFH holds municipalities accountable if they want to receive federal dollars, but doesn’t tell them how to do it.
“The 2015 AFFH rule offers guidance, not a particular solution,” says Greene, who was part of the HUD team that wrote the rule in 2015. “Every plan I’ve reviewed has been incredibly diverse; there was a huge range of strategies depending on the area. This is very far from Trump’s assertion that the AFFH rule was requiring rezoning of suburbs or even to build affordable housing.”
Fight Single-Family Zoning to Expand Housing and Curb Discrimination
The U.S. faces a shortage of housing, running 19% below last year’s supply. The housing shortage is the most pronounced in the West, according to data from NAR.
Experts on both sides of the aisle have called for a ban on single-family zoning, which is said to drive up home prices and restrict new construction, contributing to the housing shortage.
A story by Charles Marohn published in The New Conservative says about single-family zoning: “After all, there is no greater distortion of the market than local zoning codes, and there are few bureaucracies doing more harm to property rights and freedom than local zoning offices.”
Biden addresses zoning issues several times in his housing plan when it concerns discrimination or where federal grant money is involved.
The Biden plan would seek to “eliminate local and state housing regulations that perpetuate discrimination.” More specifically, Biden’s proposal requires states receiving community development or transportation block grants from the federal government dollars through Community Development Block Grants or Surface Transportation Block Grants to incorporate inclusionary zoning into their planning. Inclusionary zoning requires that a portion of new construction is set aside for affordable housing.
Biden also would allocate $65 billion for state housing authorities and the Indian Housing Block Grant program to build and restore housing in low-income areas. This money would go to communities “that are suffering from an affordability crisis and are willing to implement new zoning laws that encourage more affordable housing.”
Ed Pinto, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank, doesn’t believe that Biden’s plan goes far enough to eradicate single-family zoning. According to Pinto, single-family zoning promotes “NIMBYism,” an acronym for “not in my backyard.”
“We have supply constraints because of terrible zoning policies,” Pinto says. “Single-family zoning promotes NIMBYism, which drives house prices up tremendously in low-cost areas. None of the things in Biden’s proposal would make things better. You still end up with a housing shortage, nowhere to build and federally guaranteed loans that increase demand against limited supply.”
Eliminate Biased Housing Practices and Expanding Affordability
The Biden housing plan sets a goal to stamp out racially biased practices like redlining, which denies people services or charges more for those services based on race, religion or ethnicity.
Furthermore, the Biden plan wants to ensure that Americans spend no more than 30% of their income on housing, which would help people in all income brackets. These ideas would be achieved by enacting legislation similar to the “Housing, Opportunity, Mobility, and Equity (HOME) Act.”
The HOME Act would give a refundable tax credit to people who spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It also would require inclusionary zoning—a requirement that developers set aside a percentage of units that would be rented or sold at reduced prices—which would help increase affordable housing construction while also knocking out housing discrimination based on race and income.
The Biden plan also would target unfair property appraisals, which values Black-owned homes at tens of thousands of dollars less than comparable white-owned homes. A study by the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institute found that homes of matching quality and amenities in predominantly Black neighborhoods were valued at 23% less than in those neighborhoods with fewer Black residents.
“Anti-discrimination legislation, like ending redlining—which Biden proposes—in housing is crucial,” David Dworkin, CEO of the National Housing Conference, a nonprofit, nonpartisan coalition of national housing leaders from both the public and private sector, says. “What Biden is proposing would help millions of Americans. There’s a disturbing element of ‘I’ve got mine, too bad for you.’ Some people say, ‘I put 20% down on the house, why can’t you?’
Bottom Line
Biden’s housing plan aims to reduce or eliminate discriminatory practices in the housing industry through legislation and expanded funding, from reinstating Fair Housing Rules to broadening programs that would help low-income families.
However, while Biden’s vision of fair and affordable housing is both admirable and needed, critics say that he’s doing little more than throwing money at big problems, such as the lack of affordable housing.
“Biden has one solution to every problem: He’s going to spend more money on it. There’s very little thoughtful planning here; what there is is an open checkbook,” says Michael Tanner, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/mortgages/biden-housing-policies/
