德州卡车偷渡酿53死 黑心驾驶竟想「装幸存者」躲警察
世界新闻网
6/29/2022
德州警方27日发现一辆联结货柜卡车内有大量移民尸体，最终这场「移民悲剧」的死亡人数升至53人，最新消息指出卡车司机及其同伙29日在联邦法院被指控犯下贩卖人口罪，司机甚至在警方到场时想「伪装成幸存者」逃离。
路透报导，这辆载有来自墨西哥、危地马拉、洪都拉斯和萨尔瓦多的移民的卡车27日被发现遗弃在德州圣安东尼奥市郊的一条高速公路附近的荒废工业区，当天该地区的气温飙升至华氏103度（约摄氏39.4度），当局赶到现场时发现卡车货柜内完全没有供水或空调。
官员描述发现货柜的后门半开着，里面有「成堆的尸体」、其中许多摸起来「很烫」，附近的地面更发现其他受害者，有的已经死亡、有的丧失行动能力。根据司法部的说法，卡车司机、45岁的萨莫拉诺（Homero Zamorano）是德州人，他最终在现场附近被捕，目前被指控一项刑事诉讼、罪名为「走私导致死亡」。
据联邦检察官称，圣安东尼奥警察当时发现萨莫拉诺躲在灌木丛中，墨西哥国家移民研究所所长加杜诺（Francisco Garduno）29日更在记者会上透露这名司机在被拘留时「试图冒充幸存者之一」，希望借此逃过警方的法眼。随后曝光的监视器画面中更可以见到萨莫拉诺在美墨边境还「谈笑自如」。
司法部在声明中提到第2名嫌疑人、28岁的马丁尼兹（Christian Martinez）于28日被捕，并被控一项「合谋运送非法外国人」的罪名。官员们还发现这些移民身上被泼洒一种刺激性物质，据悉，走私贩会借此掩盖「人类的气味」并逃避警犬的检测。
墨西哥人约占这起悲剧的死亡人数的一半，包括未成年人在内的11人仍在住院治疗。墨西哥政府表示除了27名墨西哥人外，受害者还包括14名洪都拉斯人、7名危地马拉人和2名萨尔瓦多人，另外卡车上还有部分移民的国籍仍不清楚。
德州偷渡惨案／卡车中途故障 无良驾驶丢下整车人逃跑
世界新闻网
6/29/2022
美墨边界的德州长年涌入数以万计的无证移民，警方指出，27日晚间在圣安东尼奥市郊被困在一辆联结车上的无证移民恐怕是先从德州边境城市拉雷多(Laredo)上车，行驶150哩后发生机械故障，司机弃车逃逸，酿成这场至少至今已有51人死亡的悲剧。
纽约时报报导，至少三具尸体被发现散落在卡车行经的路上，最远的尸体距离事故车辆约75码、相当于68.6公尺；警方也推断，这些人可能在车内就已死亡，后来才被摔出车外。
警方目前仍在附近一带搜索生还者，更不排除有更多人在车辆停下前就已跳车或被摔出车外。
当局28日晚间说明，该车辆从150哩外的拉雷多出发，德州贝克萨尔郡法官沃尔夫(Nelson Wolff)说：「他们把车停在路旁，显然是有一些机械故障的问题，所以他们就把车丢在那儿。」
消防队抵达现场时形容车上放着「成堆的尸体」，当天气温为华氏103度、等同于摄氏39度以上，而且车上完全没有水。
此外，德州论坛报(Texas Tribune)还指出，有些人在死前踉跄地走出车外，被警方在几个街区外被发现，而他们的身上还被洒了牛排调味料，显然是为了掩盖他们的气味。
如今车上原本究竟载了多少人仍不得而知，但警方表示司机已经遭到拘留；圣安东尼奥警察局长麦曼纳斯(William McManus)虽然没有公布司机的身分，但表示他在步行逃逸后没多久就被警方找到。
这起事件也被视为美国自2003年以来最严重的偷渡死亡事件；当年的情况非常类似，一辆18轮的联结车载着大批无证移民从南德州一路前往休士顿，车内共19人在闷热的旅途中死亡；与此同时，美国非法移民跨境、救援和死亡的人数也逐渐创下拜登政府任内的纪录。
客服电话：1 (888) 666-7723
客服邮箱：customerservice@huarenstore.com
独立日提前购，22款风靡华人圈的厨房小家电特惠推荐，速来选购！
偷渡遇上103℉高温 德州卡车惊现46尸体、16人幸存
世界新闻网
6/27/2022
德州圣安东尼奥(San Antonio)警方27日晚间说，员警在一辆被抛弃于市区西南外围的18轮联结车(tractor-trailer，又称半挂式卡车)车厢内发现46具尸体，员警抵达现场时另外找到16名生还者，已紧急送往当地医院接受治疗。
近年移民死亡人数最多案件之一
纽约时报报导，所有死者据推测疑似都是非法入境的外籍移民；主管官员指出，这起事件是近年来移民死亡人数最惨重的案件之一。整起案件调查很快将由国土安全部接手。
当地官员对纽时表示，警方推测所有死者都是非法入境的外籍移民。知情官员透露，圣安东尼奥警察局现正全力搜索联结车司机的下落。官员说，联结车被抛弃在距离拉克兰空军基地(Lackland Air Force Base)不远，靠近铁道及汽车报废场的偏远地带的卡辛大道(Cassin Drive)及昆因塔纳路(Quintana Road)交叉口，隔了一段时间才被人发现。
德州面临人数频创纪录的非法移民从墨西哥进入美国境内，今年春夏两季都出现非法入境人潮。
纽时报导，40多人死因为何目前仍无法确知，不过圣安东尼奥及德州其他城市今年6月都因热浪来袭出现高温，近几天气温几乎追上历年来最高温度纪录，27日温度飙至华氏103度。
海关与边境保护局(U.S. Customs and Border Protection，CBP)发言人说，国土安全调查局(Homeland Security Investigations，HSI)已派出一支调查小组抵达现场，但拒绝透露进一步细节。国土安全调查局是移民和海关执法局 (Immigration and Customs Enforcement，ICE)旗下机构，专门处理人口走私案件。
墨西哥外交部长厄伯拉特(Marcelo Ebrard)27日说，墨西哥驻美总领事正赶往事发地点；厄伯拉特说，虽然死亡人士的国籍仍无法确定，但对这起事件表示哀悼。
圣安东尼奥警方紧急联骆天主教慈善会(Catholic Charities)对生还移民提供协助。圣安东尼奥大主教贾西亚-史提勒(Gustavo García-Siller)在推特发表声明说：「有46名移民死在圣安东尼奥。愿上帝悲怜他们。」推文中写道：「他们希望追求更好的人生。历经乌瓦德镇(Uvalde)小学枪击案之后，现在又发生这事，天主请帮忙我们。」
华人偷渡追逐美国梦 从被关八个月逆转为洛县餐厅老板
世界新闻网
5/15/2022
洛杉矶县居民林先生（化名）今年24岁，是合法在美国居住的新移民。但他在拿到身份前，曾因偷渡被抓进移民监狱长达八个月，从被释放时身无分文到现在拥有一家餐厅，背后经历过许多心酸。
林先生偷渡来美时年仅20岁，在当时女友的劝说下陪同她一同来美国。当时他觉得来美国可能会有更好的发展，毅然答应便和女友出发前往美国，两人首先飞到墨西哥。试图从美墨边境偷渡进美。然而女友成功了，林先生却被抓进移民监狱。
在移民监狱坐牢的八个月时间里，林先生起先还跟女友保持联系。但随着时间推移，那位女友与他的联系也越来越少，在他坐牢的第六个月，与女友彻底失联。当时他除了绝望和懊悔之余，更失去来美最初的意义。
当时林先生看着身边的狱友一个个被遣返或保释成功，内心十分煎熬，不知道等待自己的未来会是如何。所幸在国内家人的帮助下，他保释成功便在洛杉矶落脚找工作。
林先生回忆，刚出狱时身无分文，只有全身上下的一套衣服，连手机也没有。因女友也彻底失联，只有自立自强，开始在洛杉矶的中餐馆挨家挨户的询问，找寻有食宿的工作，之后便在一家中餐厅开始了他的餐饮业人生。
一开始因为他是连厨房都没进过的菜鸟，只能从最基本的打杂做起，并帮忙切菜。他说，好几次不心心将自己的手指误切到，只有戴起手套继续切菜，以及帮忙洗碗。刚开始工作时，有时下班后脱掉手套，发现手套里都是鲜血淋漓，且伤口也不容易愈合。慢慢的也就习惯了，熟练之后切到手的次数就很少了。
由于不甘心只待在基层，以致每天只要有时间，他便在炒菜师父身边跟前跟后学习料理技巧。但真正让他有机会攀升的契机，却源于跟师父的争执。有次他与厨房的师父起了争执，师父愤怒的表示，让外行的他不要干涉过多料理的烹调方式。不甘示弱的他，便立即炒了盘菜给师父证明他的能力。也正是这盘菜，让师父开始对他刮目相看；很快的，他便由打杂一路攀升到厨房的二厨，月薪也从刚开始的两千元慢慢涨到三千多元，而他在美国的第二年，也申请到了绿卡。
从移民监获释到工作的期间，林先生曾出庭几次移民法院。在律师提供的供词下，移民法院没有过多刁难，给予了他暂时的工卡，之后第二年他便成功申请到绿卡。
在餐饮业打滚了几年后，疫情开始了，当时疫情在洛杉矶蔓延的十分严重，许多餐厅都在经济压力及疫情冲击下关门，包括他服务的那家店。失业在家的他，便萌生了开店想法，在与几位朋友商量及选址后，他与另外一位朋友，在洛县联手开了一家中式快餐店。
林先生说，他在美国从零到现在拥有自己的一家店，除了靠着意志力一步一步走到现在，更多的也是幸运。他很感激身边的人的帮助及提携，才能让他在美国有一席之地。
美国梦变梦魇 中国行动计划重创华裔学者在美发展
世界新闻网
5/06/2022
马州国会众议员拉斯金(Jamie Raskin)6日在百人会年度会议中表示，「中国行动计划」给在美华裔带来的伤害难以弥合，曾遭FBI误控间谍的华裔学者也在「中国行动计划与美中合作损失」座谈会上，分享遭司法部错误指控的亲身经历，他们倾力追求的「美国梦」一度成为「美国梦魇」。
拉斯金曾在白宫促成首场关于终止「中国行动计划」(China Initiative)的圆桌会议，他表示，「美国不应以族裔、文化背景定罪他人，政府不应致力收集罪证(guilt)，而应平等对待各族裔在学术、科技等方面的成就和贡献。」
拉斯金说，我们应让世界各国、各族裔愿意来美感受民主的力量，「美国不完美，但在创造多元社会、维护人权方面，始终致力作国际的榜样」。
川普政府为对抗中国对美国发动国安威胁，因而发起「中国行动计划」，2019年以来指控20多名学者隐瞒与中国的关系，给华裔学者在美生活蒙上阴影，甚至家人也遭政府监控，虽然多数学者最终被无罪释放，但被「族裔侦防」(racial profiling)的经历仍严重损伤他们的学术和声誉。
曾遭司法部错误指控为间谍的麻省理工学院(MIT)教授陈刚(Gang Chen)，2021年被控申请联邦基金以从事纳米技术研究时，隐瞒与中国的合作关系和在中国的任职，他的儿子甚至在去超市采购、学习驾车时也被监控，虽然司法部已撤销对陈刚的控诉，但他和家人仍心有余悸，「身处牢狱的日子是我毕生的至暗时期」，曾经满怀希望的美国梦甚至一度变成骇人梦魇。
费城天普大学(Temple University)华裔物理教授郗小星(Xiaoxing Xi)表示，司法部曾根据他为推动学术合作，发给中国学者的电子邮件内容，指控他向中国政府泄露科技机密，2015年5月在家中，郗小星当着妻子和女儿的面，被FBI探员逮捕，还被要求按指纹、脱衣搜身；郗小星说，虽然「中国行动计划」已终止，但司法部的部分政策仍阻碍美中学术交流。
郗小星2021年也向联邦政府提出索赔，不仅为打破司法部对他提出的所有不实指控，更是为阻止执法部门今后继续针对亚裔学者和百姓进行族裔侦防，「如果我们能团结前进，就一定能抵达某个目的地。」
华裔数学教授肖明庆下周受审，遭美司法部三项指控
文章来源: 机器之心Pro
4/20/2022
60岁华裔数学教授肖明庆，将于下周受审。
2021 年 4 月，南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校的 59 岁华裔数学教授肖明庆（Mingqing Xiao）遭到了美国司法部的起诉，罪名是两项「电信诈骗」（wire fraud）和一项虚假陈述（false statement）。
如果罪名成立的话，肖明庆被指控的每一项电信诈骗罪的最高刑罚为 20 年监禁，虚假陈述的最高刑罚为 5 年监禁，所有三项指控还可被判处最高 25 万美元的罚款。
被美国司法部起诉之后，肖明庆教授一直处于休假（on leave）状态。近日，这起案件终于有了进一步的消息。
据 Science Insider 报道，肖明庆将于下周 4 月 25 日在伊利诺伊州本顿的联邦法庭受审。届时，他在南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校任职以来（自 2000 年）的几位同事将出席法庭，并表示「我们与肖明庆站在一起」。他们的出席是对现年 60 岁肖明庆教授的罕见公开支持。此前，肖明庆的同事没有发表任何公开声明，担心发声会对职业生涯造成不利影响。
肖明庆教授被起诉是美国司法部 2018 年 11 月启动的「中国行动计划」（China Initiative）牵涉案件之一，这项计划旨在通过广泛的多方面努力抵抗中国所构成的国家安全威胁和保护美国的知识产权。自启动以来，「中国行动计划」便遭到了各领域学者的积极反对，比如 2021 年 9 月斯坦福大学 177 名学者、教授联名签署公开信，要求美司法部停止执行该计划。
最终，2022 年 2 月 24 日，美国司法部宣布终止备受批评的「中国行动计划」，但又表示将以一项目标国家更广泛的安全战略取而代之。
应该看到，「中国行动计划」中的大多数案件并没有涉及科学家不当转移任何美国资助研究成果的指控。相反，它们往往关注与肖明庆类似的财务欺诈和税收指控。
Healthcare Certification and ESL Programs
有法律观察人士指出，肖明庆的受审结果可能会影响美国司法部的行动最终被视为「合理」还是「不公」。
事件回顾：肖明庆被指隐匿骗取 NSF 资助
时间倒回到 2021 年 4 月，美司法部以「电信诈骗和虚假陈述」为由将南伊利诺伊大学本代尔分校华裔教授肖明庆告上法庭，罪名是秘密为一所中国大学工作，并在申请和接受美国国家科学基金会（NSF） 151,099 美元的资助时隐瞒这些关系。
根据当时美国司法部的指控，「肖明庆申请并获得了 NSF 资助，然而并没有通知 NSF。他还以深圳大学教师的身份从中国广东省自然科学基金获得了另一项重叠的资助。」
根据起诉书，「2019 年 3 月，肖明庆在美国资助还在申请之时，他同时向中国自然科学基金会提交了另一份提案，以深圳大学员工的身份申请资金，并且没有向 NSF 披露这一消息。」美国政府机构要求申请人需要披露所有组织隶属关系和当前以及未决的申请——这一要求也包括外国政府机构。
但是深圳大学网站上并未展示肖明庆相关信息。
一份法庭文件称，肖明庆于 2018 年 4 月与深圳大学签订了一份合同，并替换了先前的合同。深圳大学将肖明庆的薪资存入国内一家银行账户。当美国政府代表于 2019 年 4 月就他的美国拨款提案与他联系以确保他没有申请其他项目时，肖明庆回答说「我没有其他拨款或未决支持」。
根据伊利诺伊州公共薪资数据库的数据，肖明庆在伊利诺伊大学担任教授时的薪资为 92,828 美元。另外据《华盛顿检查者报》报道，肖明庆至少参与带领了另外 3 项 NSF 拨款项目：2006 年 8 月与应用数学相关的 91,000 美元，2010 年 9 月与数学生物学相关的 210,000 美元，以及 2014 年 8 月与计算数学相关的 90,000 美元 。
在 SIU 官网上，肖明庆的主页已经显示「Onleave.」
肖明庆在 1997 年获得伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳 – 香槟分校的博士学位，自 2000 年以来一直在南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校工作，是该校数学教授。他的研究集中于偏微分方程、控制理论、优化理论、动力学系统和计算科学。
律师称美司法部中止调查耶鲁华裔教授林海帆
4/03/2022
耶鲁大学华裔教授林海帆的代表律师称，美国司法部上周中止了针对林海帆的调查。目前还不清楚将林海帆暂停职务的耶鲁大学是否会恢复他的教职。
据美国之音报道，林海帆的代表律师瑞恩（Abraham Rein）上周五（4月1日）告诉美国之音，司法部检察官上周三通过电话通知他有关司法部中止调查的决定，但没有说明原因。
瑞恩说：“2022年3月30日，美国司法部的代表们通知我，司法部已停止对林博士的调查，并已就此通知了美国国立卫生研究院。”
据报道，司法部之所以将他们的这个决定通知国立卫生研究院，是因为这个调查最初源自国立卫生研究院2019年3月对于林海帆以及其他耶鲁教员在报告与他们获得的外部支持有关的信息准确和全面性所提出的质疑。耶鲁大学基于它所说的国立卫生研究院提供的“可靠信息”，在今年1月进行内部调查后，将林海帆停职 。报道引述消息人士称，至少从2020年7月起，林海帆就受到司法部的调查。
瑞恩也说，在他的建议下，林海帆不会就此案发表看法。
由耶鲁大学学生独立发行的《耶鲁每日新闻》（Yale Daily News）上周五也报道司法部停止调查林海帆。耶鲁大学目前还没有对最新事态发表发表评论，也没有立即回应《耶鲁每日新闻》的置评请求。
在耶鲁大学的官方网站上仍然可以找到有关林海帆的信息，包括他的职务、简历、所获奖项和荣誉等等，并没有提他被暂停职务的事。
1962年出生于中国的林海帆是一名干细胞生物学家，在被停职前是耶鲁大学尤金－希金斯讲席教授、耶鲁医学院细胞生物学系、遗传学系、妇产科与生殖科学系教授，2006年创建了耶鲁干细胞研究中心并任创始主任。他在2018年当选为美国文理科学院院士和美国国家科学院院士。林海帆也在上海科技大学、清华大学等中国大学兼任教职，2021年11月当选中国科学院外籍院士。
《耶鲁每日新闻》曾引述林海帆的同事报道，他自今年1月起被禁止进入他的实验室，也不得与他的研究小组进行接触。
耶鲁大学的比较医学系和细胞生物学系以及干细胞中心的教员早前也发表支持林海帆的公开信，指耶鲁大学违反正当的程序，在政府或大学本身的调查结束之前就将林海帆停职。比较医学系教员在信中将对他的调查归因于司法部的中国行动计划。
耶鲁大学曾强调，大学官员遵循了教职员工手册中列出的所有指导方针，并称为林海帆聘请了律师。
美国之音报道，目前不确定林海帆的案子是不是中国行动计划的一部分，也不清楚停止调查是否与司法部终止这个行动计划有关。
报道引述熟悉这个案子的法律专家称，虽然外界不会知道司法部内部对林海帆的这个案子进行的具体讨论，但是这个案子具有中国行动计划所调查的案子的所有特征，包括调查的对象是华裔学者以及他们与中国的大学及研究机构之间有联系。
中国行动计划在特朗普政府时期启动，目的是要应对据称长期以来由中国政府发动的经济间谍、盗窃知识产权和商业秘密等危害美国国家安全的活动。据报道，该计划招来了有关在美国学界引起寒蝉效应的批评与担忧。此外，由于被调查和起诉的人中有大量华裔面孔，批评人士认为这有种族定性（Racial Profiling）之嫌。
司法部根据中国行动计划展开的一些调查取得成功，包括被告认罪或陪审团定罪，但也有一些失败案子，比如撤销对麻省理工学院教授陈刚的刑事指控，被控隐瞒与中国的关系的田纳西大学教授胡安明也被法官宣布无罪。
拜登政府的司法部今年2月宣布结束中国行动计划，但并没有中止在这个计划下所展开的案子，而是对它们进行评估。司法部曾说，将继续以各种方式应对据称来自中国政府的威胁。
Department of Justice drops investigation against Haifan Lin
It is unclear whether the School of Medicine professor’s suspension by the University has ended.
By ISAAC YU | STAFF REPORTER
A federal investigation into School of Medicine professor Haifan Lin has been discontinued, according to his lawyer.
The Department of Justice notified Lin’s legal counsel, Abe Rein of the firm Post & Schell, that its investigation had been “discontinued” as of Wednesday, March 30, according to a statement from the firm. The professor had been under investigation by the DOJ since at least July 2020 following a March 2019 inquiry by the National Institutes of Health regarding “the sufficiency of reporting of outside support” by several Yale faculty, including Lin. Lin was suspended by University Provost Scott Strobel and School of Medicine Dean Nancy Brown in January in light of an internal investigation due to what the University claimed was “credible information” provided by the NIH. Faculty members decried the suspension and investigation, saying that the China Initiative, a DOJ anti-espionage campaign, unfairly discriminates against researchers of Asian and Chinese descent. It is unclear whether Lin’s specific case fell under the umbrella of the Initiative, which the DOJ ended in late February.
The University could not immediately provide a comment.
Lin, a professor of cell biology and director of the University’s prestigious Stem Cell Center, was not available to provide comment on Thursday, according to his law firm. Rein had been providing counsel to Lin regarding the government’s investigation, he said. The University had previously stated that it had acquired lawyers for Lin.
It is unclear whether Lin’s suspension remains in place. Colleagues reported that he had been barred from his lab and from contacting his research group since January. The Comparative Medicine Department and the Cell Biology Department, as well as the Stem Cell Center, released open letters in support of Lin, alleging that the University had violated due process by suspending Lin before the conclusion of an investigation by either the government or University itself. The University previously released a statement saying that its officials have followed all guidelines outlined in the Faculty Handbook.
“I hope that Haifan is reinstated as soon as possible,” School of Medicine professor and Chair of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Senate Valerie Horsley wrote to the News. “I also hope that the University gives more clarity about why he was placed on leave and when faculty are subject to being placed on leave if an investigation is underway.”
Other faculty were more critical.
“The Yale Provost’s Office could have come out of this looking good if they had backed up Haifan right from the beginning,” wrote professor of cell biology Joel Rosenbaum. “But as soon as there was just a smell of them not getting overhead from NIH grants, they took a cowardly stance. One is presumed guilty, right from the start, before there is any thorough investigation; this is not the first time this has happened.”
Yale Vice President of Communications Nate Nickerson previously wrote to the News that the University has followed all policies and due process outlined in the Faculty Handbook.
The announcement came a day after a second medical school department issued a statement in support of Lin. The newest letter, issued by the Department of Comparative Medicine, expresses “strong opposition” to events leading to Lin’s suspension and also mentions the possibility that faculty other than Lin have also been suspended. This is now the second departmental letter addressed to the University regarding Lin, after an initial school-wide inquiry and one issued by the Cell Biology Department, of which Lin is a member.
“The many recent public accounts of this situation have exposed a potential failure of due process on the part of Yale University, which appears to be, for all practical purposes, suspended him prior to the completion of the investigation,” the Comparative Medicine Department’s statement reads. “Our public discussion of this situation revealed other Chinese-American faculty may also have been similarly treated.”
The letter also attributes the investigation to the China Initiative. The News has not been able to verify with the University or DOJ that Lin’s case specifically falls under the China Initiative.
The letter was released by the department’s Twitter account on Tuesday and shared by many medical school faculty members.
被控间谍「贪婪、效忠中国」MIT教授陈刚：美国梦 变恶梦
世界新闻网
02/23/2022
麻省理工学院(MIT)教授陈刚(Gang Chen)曾因前总统川普任内「中国行动计划」(China Initiative)遭控隐瞒与中国政府关系，但联邦检察官已于今年1月撤案。陈刚接受23日播出的哥伦比亚广播公司晨间新闻(Mornings)专访时说，从自己的亲身经历可以看出，对于中国间谍渗透美国大学校园的调查行动，极可能受到偏见影响。
2021年1月14日，十多名联邦调查探员抵达陈刚位于麻州剑桥(Cambridge)的住家，周围街道遭到封锁。陈刚说，从探员一一进入前门走廊的状况研判，「我知道他们是来抓我的」；他说，探员询问并确认身分之后，便下令要他「不要动」。
陈刚在中国出生，现为美国公民，是著名的机械工程教授，当场被调查探员戴上手铐后押入监狱。如果遭控罪名成立，他将面临最高20年有期徒刑。哥伦比亚广播公司报导，根据法院纪录分析，陈刚是「中国行动计划」推出之后面临起诉的20多名学者之一。
根据刑事告诉状(criminal complaint)纪录，陈刚遭控2017年向能源部申请研究补助时隐瞒与中国的关系，2018年报税数据上则漏填一个外国银行帐号。
MIT professor who faced charges for China ties speaks out
MIT professor Gang Chen was among the most high-profile prosecutions under the Justice Department’s “China Initiative”. A year later, the charges were dismissed, and in an exclusive television interview, Chen tells CBS News chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod the case was racially and politically motivated.
陈刚在专访中说：「我们以为实现了美国梦，结果却出现恶梦。」
遭到联邦罪名指控的近一年里，陈刚遭麻省理工学院停职。哥伦比亚广播公司报导，能源部官员今年1月对联邦检察官表示，调查行动出现错误，陈刚遭控隐匿的内容，根据规定其实根本不需要申报；报导指出，相隔两周之后，联邦检察官便对陈刚撤案。
报导指出，联邦检察官并未在刑事告诉状中指控陈刚涉及间谍罪，但陈刚被捕当天调查人员的大阵仗，却等同对待严重危害国家安全的犯罪分子。
陈刚说，当天早上6时30分，调查人员命令他站在角落；并去叫醒尚未起床的陈刚妻子与女儿。他表示，妻子后来表示，听到有人喊着「警察」，还以为是作梦。
陈刚被补后，当时的联邦检察官莱林(Andrew Lelling)在记者会上说，陈刚「不只贪婪，还效忠中国」；陈刚在专访中说，莱林所言根本是「侮辱」。
他说，检方把他描述成对美国不忠而效忠中国，「他们所说的完全不是事实」。
2000年入籍美国的陈刚说，自己不是中国间谍，也不曾把任何研究资产或技术提供给中国。
Justice Department drops China spy initiative as past target speaks out
BY MICHAEL KAPLAN, JIM AXELROD, ROBERT LEGARE
02/23/2022
The Justice Department is ending a controversial program, launched under the Trump administration, to hunt down Chinese spies. The “China Initiative” was designed to tackle a top national security priority: identifying and prosecuting those responsible for China’s widespread theft of hundreds of billions of dollars a year in American trade secrets and intellectual property.
The announcement Wednesday by the Biden administration to shut down the program came on the heels of an exclusive interview broadcast Wednesday on “CBS Mornings” with a man who was the target of one of the initiative’s most high-profile prosecutions, MIT professor Gang Chen.
Chen says the case against him, which was dropped, highlighted the potential for bias to infect an effort to thwart Chinese espionage inside American universities.
MIT professor who faced charges for China ties speaks out
MIT professor Gang Chen was among the most high-profile prosecutions under the Justice Department’s “China Initiative”. A year later, the charges were dismissed, and in an exclusive television interview, Chen tells CBS News chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod the case was racially and politically motivated.
On the morning of January 14, 2021, more than 10 federal agents arrived at Chen’s home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, blocking off surrounding streets and making their way up to the narrow corridor to his front door.
“The way they came through the corridor, I know they were here for me,” Chen told CBS News chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod in his first television interview. “They said, ‘Are you Gang Chen?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ They say, ‘Don’t move’.”
Chen, a U.S. citizen was handcuffed and jailed. A world-renowned professor of mechanical engineering, he was one of more than two dozen researchers charged under the program, according to a CBS News analysis of court records. If convicted, he faced up to 20 years in prison.
CBS NEWS
“Today, we see Chinese espionage not just taking place against traditional targets like our defense and intelligence agencies, but against targets like research labs and universities,” said former Attorney General Jeff Sessions when he announced the China Initiative in 2018.
Former Justice Department officials tell CBS News the prosecutions were meant to send a message: to deter the academic community from hiding research ties that China could then exploit to gain access to cutting-edge technology. Yet the cases drew criticisms of racial profiling, and according to MIT president Rafael Reif, sent a chill through the scientific community.
“It is scaring the best talent in the world, which we need in this country, from coming into this country,” Reif told CBS News.
In the criminal complaint, Chen was accused of failing to disclose various ties to China in a 2017 Energy Department grant application as well as failing to disclose a foreign bank account on a 2018 tax document.
“We thought we had achieved the American Dream,” Chen said. “Until this nightmare happened.”
He was placed on academic leave for nearly a year as the federal charges hung over him. Documents reviewed by CBS News reveal that in January an Energy Department official told prosecutors they had gotten it wrong, and Chen was not required to disclose any of the affiliations he was accused of hiding.
Two weeks later, prosecutors dismissed the indictment against Chen. It is one of eight cases the department has dropped against Chinese-born researchers in the past year.
The Justice Department has denied bias in its China Initiative cases.
“We never investigate or prosecute based on ethnic identity, what country a person is from,” Attorney General Merrick Garland told lawmakers in October.
After CBS News reached out to the department last week, a spokesperson told CBS News it had concluded an internal review of the China Initiative.
On Wednesday, Matt Olsen, who leads DOJ’s national security division, told reporters an internal review of China Initiative prosecutions found no indication of racial bias or prejudice. Still, he said the Initiative was “myopic”, chilled scientific research, and created the perception the department applied different standards to people with Chinese ethnicity.
“Anything that creates the impression that the Department of Justice applies different standards based on race or ethnicity harms the departments and our efforts and it harms the public,” Olsen said.
Loyalty questioned
The complaint prosecutors filed against Chen did not accuse him of espionage, but on the morning of his arrest, he was treated like a national security threat. At 6:30 a.m., agents in his house told him to stand in a corner while they went to wake up his wife and daughter.
“My wife was in her sleep,” said Chen. “And she told me when she heard the man yell, ‘Police! Police!’, she thought she was in a dream.”
In a press conference following Chen’s arrest, then-U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling made plain how the government viewed the stakes of the case.
“The allegations of the complaint imply that this was not just about greed, but about loyalty to China,” Lelling said.
Chen called Lelling’s comments “an insult.”
“They paint me as disloyal to U.S. and loyal to China,” Chen said. “There’s no facts in what they said.”
Chen, who became a U.S. citizen in 2000, denied he was a Chinese spy and said he has never supplied China with any proprietary research or technology.
“During the course of my graduate study I fell in love with this country,” said Chen, who studies heat transfer. “My wife fell in love with this country and we decided to stay and build our family here.”
“A massive jolt”
At MIT, Reif said Chen’s arrest came as a “a massive jolt.” Believing Chen had done nothing wrong, Reif decided the school would pay his legal fees.
“I felt it was an attack on all Chinese Americans in America, particularly in academia,” Reif said. “I felt it was to some extent an attack on every foreign-born person in America, who is being told, ‘We don’t really trust you.'”
Chen first learned he was under federal investigation in January 2020, nearly a year before his arrest. He had been stopped by Homeland Security agents at Boston’s Logan Airport while returning home from a trip to China, Egypt and Morocco with his wife and two children.
“I was very uneasy,” Chen said. “They brought my entire family to a separate area, and we sat there for a few hours. Couldn’t even go to the restroom.”
An agent demanded he turn over his cellphone and computer and questioned him about the nature of his visit to China. He said he was there on business for MIT, taking meetings on a partnership the university had formed with SusTech, a Chinese university in Shenzhen.
Prosecutors accused Chen of hiding his position as an adviser to SusTech and personally collecting $19 million from the collaboration.
Reif said that’s the moment he knew the Justice Department made a mistake. While Chen worked on the collaboration, the money went to MIT. The collaboration was even advertised on MIT’s website.
“He was doing that as part of his job,” Reif said. “Professors here search, and seek money, and write proposals to do things, and receive the money, and work with students to advance science.”
Reif agreed China poses a risk when it comes to misappropriating American intellectual property, but said the Justice Department’s approach was akin to using hammer when the problem called for a scalpel.
“We do have a problem with China,” Reif said. “We are not playing by the same rules. All I’m saying is, just going to universities and looking for Chinese Americans and doubting their loyalty to this nation is not the right approach.”
The case falls apart
On January 4, Justice Department prosecutors interviewed Dr. Anthony Schwartz, an official with the Energy Department’s Office of Science, which oversees grant applications.
According to a memo assembled by the Energy Department Inspector General and reviewed by CBS News, prosecutors asked Schwartz about seven different affiliations Chen allegedly hid on a 2017 grant application and a follow-up progress report in 2019.
Schwartz told prosecutors he did not believe Chen was required to disclose any of the seven affiliations on either the application itself or the follow-up progress report.
“He never hid anything he did from anybody,” Chen’s attorney, Rob Fisher, told CBS News.
Within weeks, prosecutors called Fisher to tell him they had dropped all charges and his client was a free man. Fisher said a full and outright dismissal is “very rare” and “indicates a major mistake was made.”
In a statement announcing the dismissal of charges against Chen, the Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Rachael Rollins said her office obtained new information and concluded they could no longer meet their burden of proof at trial.
“As prosecutors, we have an obligation in every matter we pursue to continually examine the facts while being open to receiving and uncovering new information,” Rollins wrote. “We understand our charging decisions deeply impact people’s lives.”
The Justice Department has since initiated an internal review of the entire program — with results expected to be announced Wednesday. Lelling, who has left for private practice, declined an interview, but wrote in a recent social media post the China Initiative had “drifted” and “DOJ should revamp, and shut down, parts of the program, to avoid needlessly chilling scientific and business collaborations with Chinese partners.”
Olsen said the Justice Department would continue China-related cases under the banner of a “broader approach” to fighting foreign threats, not just from China, but from nationals like Russia and Iran too.
He said the Department will take “an active supervisory role” going forward in research integrity cases to make sure there is “intent and materiality.” In some cases, he said “civil or administrative remedies” may be more appropriate. Chen said he felt relief when the charges were dropped, but believes he should never have been accused in the first place.
A CBS News analysis found six China Initiative cases still pending against researchers, three of whom are American citizens of Chinese ethnicity. Olsen did not comment on the pending cases, but said the Department continues to stand behind the cases it is currently prosecuting that were brought as part of the now-retired program.
Chen still worries about the damage the whole episode has done to his reputation. He has returned to teaching at MIT this semester, but said he is still haunted by the arrest.
“I am no longer the Gang Chen I was before,” he said. “From my family, the trauma we experience, the fear we still have, to my professional career. My research group is gone. I will no longer be the same person I was before.”
华裔教授陈刚：我很害怕 愤怒与幻灭！我们在自残
文章来源: 纽约时报
马萨诸塞坎布里奇——周五，陈刚回到他在麻省理工学院的实验室，祝贺他的人立刻将他团团围住，拥抱他、祝贺他，就在前一天，政府撤回了对其在申请拨款时撒谎的指控。
迎接他的还有一些邀约。同事们邀他参加受资助的研究，重新开始他成年以来一直从事的工作。
陈刚研究的是热传导。他希望开发出一种超导体，可以将汽车尾气中的热量转化为电能，或者可以给身体降温的衣服面料。被捕后的一年里，远离研究成了艰难无比的事情。
陈刚婉言谢绝了邀约。有了去年的经历——清晨的逮捕、戴着手铐和脚镣、在一次新闻发布会上被描述为对中国效忠——他不确定自己是否还能放心地申请美国政府的研究基金。
“你努力工作，你有良好的产出，你建立了口碑，”陈刚在他麻省理工学院的办公室里接受了三个半小时的采访，这是他第一次就此案接受采访。“政府得到了他们想要的，对吧？但是最后，你却被当成间谍。这让你心碎。这会打击你的信心。”
上周，政府撤销了针对陈刚的案件，该案指控他在向美国能源部申请270万美元拨款的过程中隐瞒了与中国有关的七个关系。检察官宣布，他们收到了新的信息，表明陈刚没有义务披露这些关系，使得此案难以成立。
“我们明白，我们的指控决定深深地影响着人们的生活，”本月宣誓就任美国新任检察官的蕾切尔·罗林斯说。“作为联邦检察官，我将始终鼓励我们办公室的检察官在诉讼的每一个阶段进行这种严格和持续的审查。今天的撤诉就是这一过程的结果。”
这次撤诉令“中国计划”受折，该计划始于2018年，旨在打击中国的经济和科学间谍活动。很多起诉，比如针对陈刚的案件，并没有指控间谍活动或窃取信息，而是涉及范围更窄的问题：向美国机构申请拨款时没有披露同中国机构的关系。批评者说，它在华裔科学家中导致了普遍的恐惧气氛。
陈刚说，过去一年的经历令人痛苦，让人深感幻灭。
他说，几个月前，检方向他提出交易：政府将放弃刑事指控，换取他承认与中国的一些联系。他说，他拒绝了。
“我就是这个心态，”他说。“我没做错什么。”
陈刚的父母都是数学老师，在中国的文化大革命期间，他们被派往农村教书。成长过程中，他不奢望成为科学家。他的父母都是地主的后代，在中国政府的心目中属于“出身不好”，不能获得信任。父亲警告他，可能会当一辈子农民。
但后来毛泽东去世了。陈刚参加了首届高考，以优异的成绩成为学术精英。他在25岁时移民美国，并于2000年入籍成为美国公民。
他还说，在麻省理工学院期间，他曾经常劝阻那些被招募来将研究带出美国的科学家。他说，如今美国对科学家的起诉让他深受震撼，他不确定自己是否还会那么做。
“我不知道自己是否还能给出同样的建议，”他说。“我不知道事态会如何发展。我认为这个国家必须觉醒。我们是在残害我们自己。我们是在实施真正的自杀行为，对吧？在这方面，我现在真的不知道该怎么给别人建议。也许要再过一段时间。我不知道。这很难说。”
“这没什么好庆祝的，”陈刚在首次接受采访谈论此案时表示。“那是一段悲哀的历史，是这个国家的悲哀。” TONY LUONG FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
清晨的逮捕
到2019年，司法部开始宣布对与中国机构合作的科学家提出指控。陈刚有时通过朋友和同事了解到这些案例。他决定不去中国休年假，因为担心这会让他成为目标。
2020年1月，哈佛大学化学系主任查尔斯·利伯被捕，令陈刚感到震惊。利伯被控隐瞒自己参与中国“千人计划”的情况。但陈刚说，自己和同事们都不觉得他们的活动与利伯有任何相似之处。
“对我们中的大多数人，当看到那样的政府指控，我们会说，‘哇，他做过这种事？’”他说。“因此，我们都倾向于相信政府。”
但他也受到了调查。就在同月，陈刚结束中国、埃及和摩洛哥之旅返美时，在洛根国际机场被扣留了两三个小时。他回答了一名国土安全局特工的问题，只在问讯最后，当特工找他要设备密码时，他才予以拒绝。
麻省理工学院将外聘律师罗伯特·费舍尔介绍给他，曾做过检察官的费舍尔在此后一年时间里与他见过八次面。不过，陈刚表示，他并未担心调查会招致什么严重后果。
“我的意思是，我没有做错任何事，”他说。“所以不管他们怎么查，都不会发现我做错了什么。”
2021年1月14日早上六点半，他正在煮咖啡，这时有人来敲门。他打开门，看到10到20名联邦特工在门口。他被告知站在墙角，这些特工去叫醒了他的妻女。当妻子看到他被铐走，她开始对FBI特工们说话，他曾想叫住她，告诉她别说了，但却不敢开口。
“我不敢说中文——因为我跟她的大部分交流都用普通话——但那时我不敢说中文，”他说。“他们一把我带走，我就特别后悔，因为我应该用中文对她喊，‘你说的一切都可能对你不利。’”
在接下来被关押的几个小时里，陈刚在牢房中来回踱步，后来开始做瑜伽。他记得自己曾问FBI特工，他们是否被要求确保他不会自杀，并向他们保证他没有自杀的打算。下午两点左右，他终于被释放，在回家的车上，他开始发抖。
曾尝试表演过单口喜剧的陈刚半开玩笑半认真地说，那次经历让他和妻子恶心到人消瘦。
“我们俩都感觉非常恶心，”他说。“我们之前并不知道这个英文词的真正含义。但感觉好真实。恶心是生理现象。我们以前总见到这个词，但我说的是在经历这一切之后的生理反应。”
陈刚被安排带薪休假，因此他不能进入校园，也不能与麻省理工学院的员工接触。他手上还有五六个研究项目，而在那之后的几个月，这些项目都进展缓慢，难以为继。他带的15名博士后被转移到其他课题小组，带走了他们的知识贡献。
“我们都是输家，对吧？” 陈刚说。“我的名誉被毁了，我的学生、我的博士后，他们的学术生涯也被改变了。他们换了其他小组。麻省理工学院，整个美国，我们都输了。我无法估量损失。这种损失是没法计算的。”
去年9月，他收到了好消息。检方提出达成延期起诉协议的想法，这将使他能够重回工作岗位，未来还能申请政府资助。他的律师费舍尔透露，作为回报，他必须承认与中国的一些关系，而这些关系并不违法。
费舍尔表示，这样的协议是“非常非常罕见的”，会让陈刚免去法庭受审的风险，他也试图用这一点来打动陈刚。
“很多人会认为这是一次胜利，”他说。“我告诉他，‘上帝啊，如果我和你一起坐在法庭上，而法庭宣判的结果是有罪，那对我来说可太痛苦了。’”
陈刚说，他认真考虑过接受这个交易。但他担心关于他清白的问题会挥之不去，或是会被要求向检察官谈论他的同事。
“我决不会牵连任何人，”他说。“看到他们可以把事实说得多么可怕，我对他们毫无信心。一点都没有。”
上周四，当政府的撤诉动议被公开后，同事们纷纷祝贺了陈刚。但他依然忧心忡忡。
“很难直接告诉他们，这没什么好庆祝的，”他说。“这是一段悲哀的历史，是这个国家的悲哀。”
他不确定要如何让自己的学术生涯重回正轨。没有研究小组或资金来源的支持，他一直在撰写个人研究论文。周四，也就是起诉被撤销的当天，他在凌晨四点半起床，完成了一篇关于水中能量转换的论文。
但他表示，他觉得公开谈论“中国行动”计划像是一种义务。在本周发表于《波士顿环球报》的一篇观点文章中，陈刚呼吁国会和司法部审查他的案件，追究检方参与者的责任。
至少在目前，他对美国政府提供的研究资金没有兴趣了。
“我很愤怒，我很害怕，”他说。“我热爱科学。我不想参与政治，不是吗？我见过政治，我摆脱了它。我献身科学。我乐于助人，支持他人。但我发现，人是没法逃避的。政治影响到每个人。所以，如果发现有什么事情不对，我们都应该大声说出来。”
麻省理工华裔教授陈刚被捕1年 「间谍」指控撤销
文章来源: 世界新闻网
01/20/2022
14:50 PM
联邦法官20日裁定撤销对麻省理工学院教授陈刚的指控。
司法部日益重视中国政府利用学术交流窃取美国的技术，2019年以来指控20多个学者隐瞒与中国的关系，陈刚是其中之一。
对陈刚的指控撤销，或显示美国正重新制定反中国间谍的策略。
1/15 02:00 AM
麻省理工学院(MIT)机械工程系的华裔教授陈刚因为隐瞒与中国的关系，遭到联邦刑事控罪；但消息人士透露，司法部根据联邦检方的建议，已决定撤销对他的指控，未来数周可能向法院提出。
陈刚的律师14日表示，陈刚一年前被捕后，他们一直试图为他洗刷名誉，让他早日返校任教。
司法部决定撤销对陈刚的指控，部分原因是能源部最近认为他向能源部申请研究基金时，没有义务报告他在中国的任职情况，而且能源部即使知情，也不会不批准他的申请；不过能源部此后规定，基金申请人需报告与外国的关系。
检方未来数周可能请求法院撤销对陈刚的指控，但撤案决定尚未最终完成。
司法部日益重视中国政府利用学术交流窃取美国的技术，2019年以来指控20多个学者隐瞒与中国的关系，陈刚是其中之一；哈佛大学化学系教授利伯(Charles Lieber)参加中国政府吸引外国专家的千人计划，但对国防部调查人员撒谎一案，上月陪审团裁决罪成。
但检方也撤销了多项中国的学术间谍案，最先审理的一个间谍案去年9月被裁定罪名不成立，参与此案的前联邦法官、正在角逐堪萨斯州检察长共和党提名人的马提维(Tony Mattivi)说，查处学术间谍的目的是遏止中国的间谍活动；但学术界人士表示，他们与中国政府官员的关系只是普通的学术合作。
联邦检方去年1月指控陈刚诈欺电汇、撒谎和隐瞒有外国帐户，称他2017年申请能源部的研究基金时，没有报告为中国政府从事咨询工作，包括担任深圳一所大学的顾问、北京市政府下属一家企业的海外科学家、中国国家科学基金会的评审专家，以及国家留学基金管理委员会的顾问。
但MIT数十名学者反驳检方对陈刚的指控，表示陈刚担任的职务都是学术性质，而且以前的基金申请表中很少有与外国的关系问题。
司法部长加兰德(Merrick Garland)去年10月表示，已要求主管国家安全的助理部长奥森(Matt Olsen)审议司法部可采取何种举措，以遏止中国政府对美国大学的影响力；司法部发言人说，未来数周将提出审议结果。
麻省理工教授陈刚学术间谍案 司法部考虑撤销
文章来源: 世界新闻网
12/21/2021
2020年1月，麻省理工学院(MIT)的机械工程系教授陈刚和其他20多位师生前往深圳，进行学术研究与讲学、参访企业和会见希望到MIT留学的学生等活动。飞返美国甫抵达波士顿罗根机场，陈刚即被海关与边境保护局(CBP)人员扣下检查，搜查了他的手提电脑和两部手机，盘问他在中国的活动，陈刚表示，他到中国是与一所大学合作。
一年后陈刚被捕并被控撒谎，检方指控他利用美国政府的研究基金，但与中国有广泛密切的联系。司法部开始查处中国政府表面上利用与美国大学的学术关系，实际上是窃取技术机密的间谍行为，陈刚案即是其中之一，并受到广泛关注。
与中国有关的第一个学术间谍案，经陪审团审议已被免罪。在其余24个被追查的学术间谍案中，九个已认罪、六个指控被撤销、五个因当事人已受到罚而撤案，其他四个仍在审查中，包括哈佛大学一名教授12月14日刚进入审理程序。而在司法部起诉的白领犯罪案件中，92%的结局为定罪。
陈刚没有认罪，面临美国许多学术界人士的抗议，司法部最近数周讨论了是否撤销包括陈刚在内的学术间谍案。
陈刚2000年成为美国公民，他的律师表示，检方对陈刚的效忠问题提出质疑是十足的冒犯。从被控之日起，MIT就强有力为陈刚辩护，表示陈刚与中国大学的合作对推动全球科学十分重要，校长雷夫(Rafael Reif)认为，逮捕陈刚令人「深为不安，极难理解」。逾200名陈刚的同事致函雷夫校长说：「指控陈刚的罪名其实就是正常的学术研究活动，实际上有利于增进MIT的全球影响。」陈刚对同事的支持深表感谢。
陈刚1964年出生在中国河北省，母亲文革期间曾被下放。他在大学是电力专业，后被一名美国的华裔科学家招到伯克利加州大学，1993年获得机械工程博士。在杜克大学和洛杉矶加州大学工作一段时间后，他2001年转到MIT，研究电池转为热能与电力，2003年担任MIT机械系主任。
2010年代中期，MIT开始加强与中国的关系，2015至2019年共接受中国公民捐助1亿2500万元，比MIT任何校友的捐助都多。MIT还收到中国电信巨头华为公司的1100万元捐款，联邦政府相信，华为可能被中国政府利用在全球从事间谍，但华为否认。
纽约的中国外交官常到MIT探望中国留学生，并与陈刚时有联系，上述活动都引起美国有关部门的注意，导致陈刚成为被监视的对象。
中国外交官请陈刚出任多个职位，但他曾拒绝也接受过。陈刚2013年拒绝受聘于中国政府的一个顾问委员会，但次年在被告知不会占用太多时间与精力后，他接受了该职位，但没有纪录显示他做了什么以及是否得到报酬。
2016年2月，中国时任水利部副部长王志刚访问波士顿，并与MIT的官员和学者座谈，陈刚也出席座谈会，并还出席晚餐会。检方指控说，陈刚会晤中国副部长的当天用手机做了笔记，是他参与中国间谍战略的证据。
陈刚的笔记写道，中国的党代会确立了「以科技创新为内核」的指导思想，下一步是如何促进MIT与中国的合作。但陈刚表示，他的纪录都是王志刚副部长的原话。
FBI指涉间谍遭软禁 胡安明无罪首受访：毕生最黑暗时期
文章来源: 世界新闻网
11/29/2021
联邦调查局(FBI)探员花了近两年时间跟监生于中国、归化加拿大公民的胡安明(Anming Hu)教授，时刻不松懈，甚至监视他上大学的儿子；FBI告知胡安明原本具备终身教职的大学，称他是中国间谍，让校方配合FBI调查并解雇他。
纽约时报报导，根据FBI探员的证词，无法提具胡安明从事间谍活动的证据；但联邦检察官依旧提出对胡安明的指控，称他隐瞒与北京一所大学的关系，并在申请国家航空暨太空总署(NASA)研究资金时欺骗政府。
陪审员称此案「荒谬」
此案在陪审团无法作出裁决的情况下结束，一名陪审员称此案「荒谬」；今年9月，法官罕见声明胡安明的所有罪名不成立。
胡安明遭软禁18个月获释后，首度接受深度访谈表示，「那是我毕生最黑暗的时期。」
美国的大学曾欢迎来自各地的最优秀聪颖科学人才，但官员怀疑胡安明等科学家利用美国机构的开放性，在中国政府的要求下窃取敏感研究资讯；这对不仅造成寒蝉效应，也让研究速度减缓、人才流出美国。
纽时访问多名在美国大学任职的华裔科学家，发现社会边缘群体的迹象。
部分人反映，中国籍科学家被要求接受外国势力干涉的强制培训，签证申办与加签手续延迟，令他们感觉受辱。
他们全都担心，与中国科学家的合作或披露上的失误，都可能成为FBI探员找上门的原因。
Sep 13, 2021
没收入只能靠捐款
胡安明曾在诺克斯维尔田纳西州立大学(University of Tennessee at Knoxville)任教，他的案件正是政府越权的例证。
FBI调查期间，他被软禁18个月，没有工作或收入，仰赖众筹捐款支付诉讼费用；邻居和教堂朋友给他送菜，帮他倒垃圾。
诺克斯维尔田大后来恢复他的教职，但胡安明表示，他的移民身分仍未确定。
他说：「我的基本人权被侵犯，名誉毁败，心灵深受重伤，家人也受害，这不公平。」
亚利桑纳大学(University of Arizona)和由著名华裔美国人组成的非营利会员组织「百人会」(Committee of 100)调查美国学术界的华裔与非华裔科学家，受访的近半数华裔科学家觉得，被美国政府监视，其中包括部分美国公民。
部分人表示，始于前总统川普时期的「中国计划」(China Initiative)，在拜登总统执掌下继续进行。
中国计划旨在防止中国政府窃取美国商业机密和其他间谍行为，但学者、科学家、民权组织和议员质疑此计划在针对学者方面太超过，尤其是大多数研究并非机密且最终都会公开发表。
史丹福大学、柏克莱加大和普林斯顿大学近2000名学者连名签署致司法部长加兰德(Merrick Garland)公开信，表达对中国计划针对华裔研究员的关切，呼吁终止此计划。
曾获诺贝尔物理奖的史丹福大学教授、前总统欧巴马时期的能源部长朱棣文(Steven Chu)说：「知识技术力量有很大一部分来自移民，我们搬石头砸的不是自己的脚，而是靠近头部。」
留美促进司法正义
胡安明是「中国计划」首位受审的学者，FBI过去三年对大学或研究机构提出12宗诉讼，但没有一项涉及经济间谍、窃取商业秘密或知识产权，大多数涉及电信欺诈、对联邦调查人员说谎，以及未能披露与中国的关系等。
著名分子生物学家、西湖大学(Westlake University)教授施一公(Shi Yigong)说，同事抱怨美国的怀疑气氛，有些人因此放弃工作。
胡安明决心留在美国，不仅要为科学贡献，也要促进司法正义。他说：「我对政治不感兴趣，且对政治几乎一无所知，但我知道，针对华裔和亚裔，不会让美国变得强大。」
当FBI将矛头对准华裔科学家 他们都遭遇了什么？
文章来源: 纽约时报
11/29/2021
新泽西州普林斯顿大学校园。在美国大学工作的中国和华裔科学家遭到美国政府的过多针对。 AN RONG XU FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
FBI特工们花了将近两年的时间尾随这位教授，在他上班、去杂货店的路上跟踪他，甚至监视他已经到大学生年纪的儿子。他们告诉这位教授终身教职所在的大学，他是一名中国特工，这使得学校配合了FBI的调查，后来解雇了他。
但是，根据一名特工在法庭上的证词，FBI无法找到证明他进行间谍活动的证据。
但联邦检察官还是提出了对胡安明博士的指控，称他隐瞒与北京一所大学的关系，并在从美国国家航空航天局获得研究资金时欺骗政府。审判在陪审团无法作出裁决后结束。一名陪审员称此案“荒谬”。9月，一名法官做出了罕见的举动，宣布这位中国出生的科学家的所有罪名不成立。
“那是我一生中最黑暗的时期，”胡安明在被无罪释放后的第一次深度采访中说。
美国的大学曾经欢迎来自世界各地的最优秀、最聪明的科学人才。但政府官员越来越怀疑，像胡安明这样的科学家正在利用美国机构的开放性，在中国政府的要求下窃取纳税人资助的敏感研究。这对整个校园产生了寒蝉效应，科学家和大学管理人员表示，这导致研究速度减缓以及人才流出美国，可能会使北京受益。
对几位在美国大学工作的华裔科学家的采访可以看到一个处在社会边缘的群体。一些人说，关于外国势力干涉的强制性培训——培训中的示例只有华裔科学家——以及签证续期出现的无法解释的延迟，令他们感到被羞辱。他们都担心，无论什么事情——与另一位来自中国的科学家的合作、披露表上的失误——似乎都可能成为联邦调查人员上门的原因。
胡安明在田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校工作，对他的审判被认为是一个明显的政府越权行事案例。在调查期间，他被软禁了18个月，没有工作或收入，依靠GoFundMe捐款支付他的法律辩护费。邻居和教堂的朋友给他送菜，帮他倒垃圾。虽然后来该大学提出恢复他的工作，但作为加拿大归化公民的胡安明表示，他的移民身份仍未确定。
“我的基本人权被侵犯，我的名誉被毁，我的心受到了深深的伤害，我的家人也受到了伤害，”他说。“这不公平。”
本周在田纳西州诺克斯维尔家中的胡安明。这位出生于中国的科学家和教授被指控为中国间谍，过去几年，他一直在反击这一指控。 SHAWN POYNTER FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
亚利桑那大学和由著名华裔美国人组成的百人会最近进行了一项研究，调研了在美国学术机构工作的华裔和非华裔科学家在科学研究中的种族和民族问题。在受访的中国科学家中，约有一半——包括一些美国公民——表示，他们觉得自己受到了美国政府的监视。一些人指责一项名为“中国计划”的执法计划，该计划始于特朗普政府期间，并在拜登总统的领导下继续进行。
该计划旨在防止中国政府窃取美国商业机密和其他间谍行为。但学者、科学家、民权组织和立法者质疑它是否在针对学者方面走得过远，特别是因为大学进行的大多数研究并非机密且最终都会被发表。
斯坦福大学、加州大学伯克利分校和普林斯顿大学等机构的近2000名学者签署了致美国司法部长梅里克·加兰的公开信，表达了对该计划过多针对华裔研究人员的担忧，并敦促终止该计划。
“我们的知识分子和技术力量有很大一部分来自移民，”署名人之一、获得过诺贝尔奖的斯坦福大学物理学家、前美国能源部长朱棣文说。“我们搬起石头砸的不是自己的脚，差不多砸的是自己的头。”
胡安明是“中国计划”下第一位接受审判的学者。到目前为止，FBI三年内对大学或研究机构提出了12项起诉，但没有一项涉及经济间谍或窃取商业秘密及知识产权的指控。大多数指控涉及电信欺诈、对联邦调查人员撒谎以及未能披露与中国的关系等。
最近对学术界的审查背后是一个酝酿多年的问题。
过去20年里，由于联邦政府对大学基础科学研究的资助停滞不前，科学家们开始寻找其他资金来源。美国大学急于扩大其全球足迹，促进了与国际同行的合作，也包括中国在内。立志成为科技超级大国的中国政府对此欣然接受。
研究人员充分利用了中国提供的越来越多的机会，包括人才招聘项目、利润丰厚的咨询合同、荣誉称号和资助。
但中国政府有时利用这些关系窃取或鼓励从美国公司转移知识产权。随着特朗普政府加强对中国间谍活动的审查，中国将网络扩大到学术合作，促使提供资金的联邦机构——以及一些大学——开始更严厉地执行对外关系和利益冲突披露的政策。
最近几个月，学者们签署了致美国司法部长梅里克·加兰（中）的公开信，敦促终止中国计划。 STEFANI REYNOLDS FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
“决不能排外或者做出种族定性，”乔治城大学安全与新兴技术中心高级研究员安娜·普格利西说。“但在讨论中忽略了我们需要去问的一个更大的问题，那就是：‘我们是否有现成的系统来抑制一个民族国家的行为和中央政府政策，而这些政策是专门针对我们系统中的漏洞设立的？’”
一些人认为，强化的审查已经达到了越权的程度。
许多科学家对他们所称的大学和资助机构不断变化和重叠的披露准则表示失望，这使得他们很难避免陷入FBI的网络中。例如，在胡安明受审期间，人们发现美国国家航空航天局和田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校对他应如何披露外国关系都给出了不明确的规定。
“我认为没有人怀疑中国政府和中共从事经济间谍和其他恶意行为，”纽约大学布伦南司法中心研究员、前FBI探员迈克尔·德曼说。“因此，美国政府应该把资源集中在这方面，而不是试图通过针对与中国间谍活动无关的大学教授来轻松获取数字上的成就。”
司法部发言人说，司法部致力于打击中国破坏国家安全的行为，但也认真对待歧视问题。
目前，不安情绪正在加剧。普林斯顿大学机械与航空航天工程教授、已入籍美国的琚诒光表示，2010年美国宇航局请他帮助制定美国火箭技术的未来计划，这是他一生的荣幸。
他说，如果他今天收到同样的邀请，他会拒绝。学术机构对中国科学家的关注太过强烈，与该机构合作带来的荣誉不值得他和家人去冒可能的风险。“不是因为我不想去服务，”他说。“是我不敢服务。”
“不是因为我不想服务，是我不敢服务，”普林斯顿大学机械与航空航天工程教授琚诒光说。他担心，如果再次与美国宇航局合作，会招致不必要的审查。 AN RONG XU FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
在这种担忧出现之际，中国却在逆转人才流失的趋势。过去10年里，越来越多的中国科学家被丰厚的资金、隆重的头衔和民族自豪感吸引回国。最近，返回中国的科学家将美国的恶劣环境也作为一项考虑的因素。
西湖大学是中国东部城市杭州的一所研究型大学，已招募了一批相当杰出的人才，其中许多人曾在美国顶级学校担任教职。今年8月，西湖大学宣布了几位新员工，包括一位来自西北大学的终身教授和另一位来自伊利诺伊大学香槟分校的教授。
著名分子生物学家、西湖大学教授施一公说，同事们抱怨美国的怀疑气氛。“说起那些选择放弃在美国工作的人，有时我确实听到了一些苦涩的故事，”施一公说。“我认为他们中的一些人，虽然不是所有人，受到了我认为相当严厉的对待。”
不过，至少有一个人决心留在美国：胡安明。
他是一名工厂工人的儿子，在中国山东省的一个贫困村庄长大，他说自己对科学的兴趣从很小的时候就开始了。上小学时，他把一个扬声器与矿石连接起来，再把它和挂在树上的简陋天线接起来，制作了一个简单的收音机。
在中国获得高等学位后，他于1997年和妻子离开中国，在几个国家工作，最后在加拿大获得第二个物理学博士学位。和之前无数移民一样，他在2013年搬到了美国，希望能有更好的生活和事业。
他说，他已经牺牲了太多，现在不能放弃这一切。
他宁愿留在美国，不仅为他自儿时起就深爱的科学，还要为促进正义——他新近产生热情的事业——做贡献。“我对政治不感兴趣，对政治几乎一无所知，”他说。“但我知道，针对华裔和亚裔美国人，不会让美国变得强大。”
无罪！华裔教授胡安明重返大学教职，并被补偿薪水
来源: 华人生活网
10/20/2021
田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校近日恢复了华裔教授胡安明的终身教职。
胡安明此前被指在接受NASA资助的同时隐藏了与中国高校的关系，不过最终获法官宣布胡安明无罪。
报道称，在一封10月14日的信中，副校长John Zomchick向胡安明提供了终身教职的工程教授职位。
校方同时还向他补偿薪水，并为他支付了移民律师费用。
另外，校方还为胡安明提供3年共计20万元的资金，助他重新启动研究。
报道称，在信中，Zomchick向胡安明解释了校方对他在签证方面的支持。胡安明是归化加拿大国籍的华裔。
2020年2月，胡安明被逮捕并被起诉欺诈和做虚假陈述。该案是时任总统川普任内美国司法部打击与外国有联系的学者行动的一部分。
检方指胡安明在申请NASA资金时故意隐瞒在他国大学任职的情况，并认为这违反了法律。胡安明的律师则称，胡安明认为没有必要将一个暑期兼职的工作作为披露信息的一部分，校方也没有要求他这样做。
今年6月，该案陪审团成员无法达成一致意见，案件流审。检方曾表示打算重新起诉，但法官上个月判胡安明无罪。
法官在判决中指出，就算胡安明有意隐瞒了他与他国大学的关系，也没有证据显示他打算伤害NASA的利益。
法官指出，NASA确实拿到了它们为之提供资金的研究成果，也没有证据显示胡安明从其它国家收钱了，或者任何在外国人参与了该研究。
美“中国行动计划”首案落定：华人教授胡安明被宣判无罪
澎湃新闻
9/10/2021
美国当地时间9月9日，因“间谍案”而被审查的田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校华人教授胡安明在美国法庭获得历史性意义的“胜利”，法官宣判胡安明无罪，对他的所有指控均不成立。
在9日发布的一份52页的裁决中，美国地方法院法官Thomas Varlan 宣布胡安明无罪，称大学管理研究奖励的规则令人困惑，检察官没有提供任何证据证明胡安明有意欺骗提供资金的美国国家航空航天局。
此前，胡安明教授同时也是美国宇航局（NASA）的研究员，于2020年2月因未能在递交给田纳西大学的利益冲突表格上披露与中国一所大学的关系而受到联邦政府起诉，被指控犯有电信欺诈罪和虚假陈述罪。
该案件被美国司法部列入“中国行动计划”（“China Initiative”）内，该计划宣称打击经济间谍活动，已针对亚裔特别是华裔科学家、研究人员和学者展开了大规模的调查。
但政府对胡安明的指控并不涉及经济间谍活动，也无任何“间谍活动”的证据。
此次判决使得胡安明教授的案件成为该计划下第一个被审判，也是第一个被判无罪的案件。
据《华尔街日报》报道，6月17日，由于陪审团围绕胡安明是否为获得美国政府研究经费而隐瞒其在中国的工作这一问题僵持不下，一名联邦法官宣布该案的审理无效。
检方指控称，在填写田纳西大学的利益冲突表格时，以及在申请NASA经费之时，胡安明没有报告他在中国的工作，误导了他所在的大学和美国政府。
胡安明在庭审中作证说，他认为自己在中国的职位属于一份暑期工作，只是每年花费几周时间的兼职，不适用美国学校的利益冲突准则，所以不需要披露。
美国联邦政府大约在三年前开始执行的“中国行动计划”意在阻止向中国转移商业机密和其他专有信息的行动，针对胡安明的诉讼就是其中的一部分。这项行动的重点之一是那些接受美国政府资助并在中国开展工作或交流的驻美研究人员，美国政府称这些研究工作可能有意或无意地涉及了尖端专有技术的转移。
然而过去两年，联邦检察官显然升级了这些行动并将指控进一步扩大化，许多被指控的学者专家坚称是清白的，认为自己被起诉是美国政府对中国充满敌意的大环境下的“受害者”。
获悉判决结果后，美国司法部发言人说： “尊重法院的决定，尽管我们对结果感到失望。”
熟悉该案的人士对澎湃新闻（www.thepaper.cn）表示，司法部对胡安明的指控不仅断送了他的职业生涯，在2020年2月被起诉后，胡安明丢掉了他在田纳西大学的工作，也对他和他家人的生活造成了极大的伤害。自从他被软禁以后，他的健康也进一步恶化，但尽管如此，他仍在与这场不公正的待遇作斗争。
“我对他的勇气非常钦佩，因为如果这场官司他输了的话，将要坐非常长的牢。他对自己充满信心，觉得没有做过这样的事情，才会坚持把官司打到底。最后的结果也证明了美国的司法制度还是有公正的地方。”美国达拉斯得州大学的前副校长冯达旋对澎湃新闻说。
法官做出这一裁决之际，美国司法部正面临来自代表亚裔美国人和国会一些民主党人的越来越多的批评，指责司法部在调查美国拨款项目中是否存在欺诈行为的指控时，不公平地针对华裔学者。
今天，联邦法院的判决使得胡安明教授获得了来之不易的“清白”。
Chinese researcher accused of spying under China Initiative acquitted of charges
Shawna Chen
9/10/2021
A federal judge on Thursday acquitted Chinese Canadian researcher Anming Hu of all fraud charges, bringing to a close the government’s controversial first trial under the Justice Department’s China Initiative.
Why it matters: The case drew attention after it ended in a mistrial and heightened the scrutiny surrounding the DOJ initiative, which faces accusations that it leads to racial profiling against Asians in the U.S.
Context: The FBI spied on Hu and his family for nearly two years. Even though agents implicated Hu as having ties to the Chinese military in meetings with Hu’s bosses at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, they could not confirm claims of spying.
- The nanotechnology specialist was instead charged with fraud for allegedly concealing part-time work for a Chinese university to secure federal funding, though UTK officials testified that they knew of the connection.
Asian American civil rights groups and lawmakers praised the acquittal.
- “Dr. Hu is finally free to return to his life and be reunited with his family,” John C. Yang, president and executive director of Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, said in a statement. But the “scars of the prosecution and investigation on Dr. Hu and his family are deep and long-lasting.”
- Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who has led efforts calling for a probe into the China Initiative, addressed the DOJ on Twitter: “You should stop discriminating against Asians … If Hu’s last name was Smith, you would not have brought this case.”
- “We must work vigilantly to ensure that what happened to Dr. Hu and his family does not happen again to anyone,” Yang added.
BLAVATNIK FAMILY FOUNDATION, NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NAME 31 FINALISTS FOR 2021 BLAVATNIK NATIONAL AWARDS FOR YOUNG SCIENTISTS
NEW YORK | June 15, 2021
Showcasing America’s most promising young scientists and engineers, the Blavatnik Family Foundation and the New York Academy of Sciences today named 31 finalists for the world’s largest unrestricted prize honoring early-career scientists and engineers.
Three winners of the Blavatnik National Awards for Young Scientists – in life sciences, chemistry, and physical sciences and engineering – will be announced on July 20, each receiving $250,000 as a Blavatnik National Awards Laureate.
The finalists, culled from 298 nominations by 157 United States research institutions across 38 states, have made trailblazing discoveries in wide-ranging fields, from the neuroscience of addiction to the development of gene-editing technologies, from designing next-generation battery storage to understanding the origins of photosynthesis, from making improvements in computer vision to pioneering new frontiers in polymer chemistry. Descriptions of the honorees’ research are listed below.
“Each day, young scientists tirelessly seek solutions to humanity’s greatest challenges,“ said Len Blavatnik, founder and chairman of Access Industries, and head of the Blavatnik Family Foundation. “The Blavatnik Awards recognize this scientific brilliance and tenacity as we honor these 31 finalists. We congratulate them on their accomplishments and look forward to their continued, future discoveries and success.”
President and CEO of the New York Academy of Sciences Nicholas B. Dirks said: “Each year, it is a complete joy to see the very ‘best of the best’ of American science represented by the Blavatnik National Awards Finalists.”
“On behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, we are extremely proud to administer the Blavatnik National Awards. This prize honors scientists at a pivotal career juncture, where support and recognition can make a huge impact on their career and their potential for future innovations and discoveries,” he said.
Three highly respected independent juries – each representing one of the awards’ categories – will determine the winning Laureates, who must be faculty-level scientific researchers and engineers 42 years of age or younger.
The Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists will celebrate the 2021 Blavatnik National Awards honorees in a ceremony on Sept. 28 at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.
About the Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists
The Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists, established by the Blavatnik Family Foundation in the U.S. in 2007 and independently administered by the New York Academy of Sciences, began by identifying outstanding regional scientific talent in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. The Blavatnik National Awards were first awarded in 2014 and, in 2017, the Awards were expanded to honor faculty-rank scientists in the United Kingdom and in Israel. By the close of 2021, the Blavatnik Awards will have awarded prizes totaling $11.9 million. Sixty-one percent of all Award recipients are immigrants to the country in which they were recognized and hail from 47 countries across six continents, reflecting the Blavatnik Family Foundation’s recognition that important science is a global enterprise. For updates about the Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists, please visit www.blavatnikawards.org follow on Twitter and Facebook @BlavatnikAwards.
About the Blavatnik Family Foundation
The Blavatnik Family Foundation is an active supporter of world-renowned educational, scientific, cultural and charitable institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Russia and other countries throughout the world. The foundation is headed by Len Blavatnik, a global industrialist and philanthropist and the founder and chairman of Access Industries, a privately held industrial group based in the U.S. with global strategic interests. Visit www.accessindustries.com or www.blavatnikfoundation.org.
Media contact
Kamala Murthy
kmurthy@nyas.org
212-298-3740
The 2021 Blavatnik National Awards Finalists
2021 Blavatnik National Awards Finalists in Life Sciences
Michael Fischbach, Stanford University
Symbiotic microbes have a remarkable talent for modulating their host’s biology. The bacterial communities in humans, such as those in the gut, are associated with diseases such as Crohn’s and diabetes. Microbiologist, Michael Fischbach, Ph.D., systematically profiles small molecules produced by bacteria that mediate the interactions between the microbiome and its host. His development of novel genetic systems has uncovered genes in a specific bacterial species found on the skin, which produces a molecule with antibiotic properties. Fischbach’s research offers new insights into how the microbiome can impact our immune system at the molecular level.
Viviana Gradinaru, California Institute of Technology
Because most medications cannot cross the blood-brain barrier to enter the brain, treating certain neurological diseases requires invasive surgery to deliver drugs directly to the brain. Neurotechnologist Viviana Gradinaru, Ph.D., has developed techniques to bypass this barrier by engineering harmless viruses that are administered inside the body intravenously. These systemic viruses cross the blood-brain barrier and deliver cargo such as genes or gene editing tools to treat neurological diseases. Gradinaru has also used her drug delivery system to target problems in the peripheral nervous system and neurons located in the gut that may cause or contribute to Parkinson’s disease. This work strives to discover unexpected sources and noninvasive treatments for multiple neurological diseases.
Kaiyu Guan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Novel sensing and modeling technologies developed by environmental scientist Kaiyu Guan, Ph.D., are revolutionizing how we monitor agricultural productivity and sustainability. Guan’s satellite- and supercomputer-enabled technology measures and predicts photosynthesis, crop water and nitrogen use, and crop yield. His innovations can generate daily “views” of every farm on the planet going back 20 years so that farmers can manage their fields for water and nutrient needs. The technology also allows to accurately monitor environmental footprints and carbon emissions. Guan’s data collection techniques are incredibly economical and scalable. Guan’s technologies enable weather-forecasting-like abilities to predict field-level agroecosystem insights and can promote “precision agriculture” to guide farming practices as farmers encounter and adapt to climate change.
Sun Hur, Boston Children’s Hospital
To trigger an immune response when a virus like COVID-19 enters the body, cells must discriminate between the RNA they naturally produce and the foreign RNA inserted by the virus. Immunologist Sun Hur, Ph.D., discovered how cells perform this discriminatory evaluation using proteins called RIG-I–like receptors. If they determine that the RNA is from a virus, the receptors send a signal to the cell to alert the neighbors and immune system of a viral infection. Sun also found that if this process goes awry, the body can enter a state of constant inflammation, causing inflammatory diseases such as Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome. Her research is providing insight into healthy immune responses as well as ones that go awry.
Houra Merrikh, Vanderbilt University
Antimicrobial resistance is a global health crisis and searching for new antibiotic drugs appears to be a losing strategy. Because bacteria evolve and build resistance to these new drugs, regardless of their potency or mechanism, we desperately require entirely new solutions. Houra Merrikh, Ph.D., has discovered a potentially transformative solution: prevent and even reverse bacterial evolution. Merrikh found that bacteria produce a particular protein that promotes the development of antimicrobial resistance, and she has identified drugs that can prevent this protein from forming. By stopping bacterial evolution, bacteria remain susceptible to antibiotics to which they would have otherwise developed resistance.
Stanley Qi, Stanford University
CRISPR technology has become well known as a technological breakthrough to edit genes. Stanley Qi, Ph.D., is a bioengineer pushing CRISPR technology to new limits beyond editing. Qi helped create a technology called CRISPR interference and CRISPR activation, known as CRISPRi/a. CRISPRi/a interacts with DNA to silence or activate specific genes, without altering the DNA sequence, which creates the ability to change stem cells into therapeutic cells such as neurons. He has modified CRISPR as an imaging tool to capture real-time “movies” of the dynamic process of gene transcription and the movement of chromosomes. Qi’s transformation of traditional CRISPR into an antiviral therapy shows promise to treat COVID-19 and the flu.
Mikhail G. Shapiro, California Institute of Technology
The lack of suitable technologies to noninvasively image and control cellular function inside a living body is a massive limitation for studying, diagnosing, and treating a wide range of diseases. Mikhail G. Shapiro, Ph.D., is a biochemical engineer who has created groundbreaking technologies using sound waves and magnetic fields to visualize and control certain cellular functions, such as gene expression. He has designed cells that can make air-filled structures made of proteins known as gas vesicles. Shapiro can image, track, and control cell functioning inside living animals and patients by manipulating the gas vesicles and other proteins. This innovative combination of ultrasound and biomolecules has the potential to improve imaging technology for diagnosing cancer and even activate neurons noninvasively.
Peter Turnbaugh, University of California, San Francisco
Scientists have made considerable progress toward understanding how diet and genetics drive varying responses to drugs. However, research has ignored how our “second genome”—the trillions of microorganisms that thrive in and on the body—can alter a human’s response to drugs. Peter Turnbaugh, Ph.D., is a microbiologist tackling this complex issue. He examines how specific gut bacterial species can metabolize drugs, potentially reducing the amount of drug available to the body. This process goes both ways. Turnbaugh found that drugs meant to target mammalian cells can have unanticipated effects on the gut microbiome. Understanding the reciprocal activity between gut bacteria and its host will be critical to design effective drugs that have minimal impact on the microbiome.
Kay M. Tye, Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Problems in processing reward, fear, and learning can cause a range of psychiatric disorders. Neuroscientist Kay M. Tye, Ph.D., investigates the neural circuitry that drives these emotions and cognitive abilities to understand addiction and depression. She discovered a neural pathway that underlies an animal’s willingness to engage in compulsive, reward-seeking behaviors despite negative consequences—a pattern observed in binge-eating and alcohol use disorders. This neural circuitry could be a target for therapeutic interventions. Tye’s addiction research identified a collection of neurons that serve as a biomarker that predicts whether an animal will develop compulsive binge-drinking behavior, even before being exposed to alcohol.
Ahmet Yildiz, University of California, Berkeley
Cells rely on molecular motors to transport proteins and other cellular components throughout the cell. These “motors” travel along a collection of molecular roadways known as the cytoskeleton. Defects in molecular motor proteins, like dynein, can cause neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS. Through his ingenious combination of molecular imaging and single-molecule measurements, molecular biologist Ahmet Yildiz, Ph.D., discovered how dynein takes steps on the cytoskeleton and generates forces to carry its cargoes. Using his innovative tools, he revealed how dynein achieves unidirectional movement and uncovered essential molecules that activate and regulate dynein motility in cells. This research provides insight into potential treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.
2021 Blavatnik National Awards Finalists in Chemistry
Shannon Boettcher, University of Oregon
To make industry and energy production sustainable, scientists must find new ways to convert and store energy and produce basic chemicals from renewable sources. Shannon Boettcher, Ph.D., is a rising leader in the field of electrochemistry. Using electrochemical processes to make our industrial economy greener, he has advanced technology that turns simple mixtures of water and atmospheric gases into hydrogen fuel, plastics, chemicals, and fertilizer. Boettcher has developed new approaches to understand catalysts that split water into clean oxygen and hydrogen fuel and uncovered materials with record performance for the oxygen evolution reaction, research that contributes to a future independent of fossil fuels.
Brandi Cossairt, University of Washington
The nanoscale is an exciting frontier in science. Synthetic chemist Brandi Cossairt, Ph.D., is helping lead the charge to understand how nanomaterials form, grow, and behave. Cossairt has harnessed surface chemistry to functionalize, protect, and enhance nanoparticles, and created a set of predictive principles that could accelerate the development of nanotechnology based on simple and scalable solution-processed materials. The impact of Cossairt’s work can already be seen in toxic elements being removed from television displays and LEDs, and in improved nanoparticle catalysis for the production of fuels and fertilizers. Looking further into the future, Cossairt is designing generalizable methods to create large networks of linked nanoparticles and hybrid nanoparticle materials that could exhibit powerful new functionality.
Paul Dauenhauer, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Chemical engineer Paul Dauenhauer, Ph.D., is pioneering ways to synthesize consumer chemicals from sustainable raw materials. Today, many commonplace materials like cleaning supplies or plastics are made from fossil fuels. Dauenhauer is seeking to replace fossil fuels with glucose, a simple sugar from plants. Through this transformative line of research, Dauenhauer has achieved high-yield production of detergents, plastics, and synthetic rubber from glucose, all performing as well as conventionally sourced products. Beyond his green synthesis methods, Dauenhauer is also forging new paths in energy storage, developing a foundational catalyst theory to store energy in the form of ammonia.
Mircea Dincă, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Most materials that conduct electricity are densely packed metals. Inorganic chemist Mircea Dincă, Ph.D., has proven that certain porous materials—metal-organic frameworks (or MOFs)—can also conduct electricity and be used in fuel cells and supercapacitors, which play critical roles in green technology systems. Taking inspiration from how individual molecules can conduct electricity, Dincă achieved a conducting MOF by weaving a network of conducting molecules into a porous solid. Dincă has operated his MOFs as supercapacitors and can retain performance after repeated use, an essential property for their use in commercial products. Dincă is partnering with Lamborghini to incorporate MOFs for energy storage in future electric supercars.
Danna Freedman, Northwestern University
The second quantum revolution brings the promise of incredibly powerful technological tools, with quantum computers and sensors customized to specific tasks. Inorganic chemist Danna Freedman, Ph.D., studies quantum bits (or qubits, the building blocks of quantum computers) based on specific properties of individual molecules. Molecules are uniquely well-suited for a bespoke quantum system: tuning their atomic composition and structure adjusts their performance. Freedman has elevated molecular qubits to the cutting edge of quantum information science, having achieved record stability and demonstrating optical read-out of a molecular qubit state. Freedman has also pushed new frontiers in material synthesis: she has achieved never-before-seen compounds using extremely high pressures. Freedman is opening up new possibilities to design materials for specific functions by making many more combinations of elements possible.
Prashant K. Jain, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Prashant K. Jain, Ph.D., a physical chemist, is unlocking more potential functions from some of the most common catalysts, such as iron or platinum, by using gold nanoparticles to harvest energy from light. Shining light on gold nanoparticles creates synchronized vibrations of electrons, called plasmons, within the gold. Jain has discovered that these plasmons concentrate light and trigger new chemical reactions that would not otherwise occur using the catalysts alone. Using this phenomenon, he has developed “plasmonic photosynthesis,” wherein carbon dioxide is converted into fuels and valuable molecules like methane or ethylene, providing a potential method to both replace fossil fuels and harvest carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Rebekka Klausen, Johns Hopkins University
Rebekka Klausen, Ph.D., is pushing synthetic polymer chemistry in innovative directions. By applying the principles underlying carbon-based synthesis to other elements in the periodic table, Klausen has achieved unprecedented control over the structure and function of silicon-based molecules and polymers. These concepts may enable tailor-made, ultrasmall silicon chips designed atom-by-atom for specific applications. Klausen is also working to disprove the basic tenet that oil and water cannot mix. Her methods to mix compounds with properties like oil and water probe both fundamental questions, such as the physics underlying the mixing of dissimilar substances, and could ultimately address profound environmental challenges, such as cleaning up oil spills or enabling true mixed-stream plastics recycling.
Wei Min, Columbia University
Physical chemist Wei Min, Ph.D., is a leader in the imaging of molecules in biological settings. Despite extensive efforts, many molecules remain unseen inside cells. Using the methods developed in Min’s laboratory, scientists can observe the complexity of natural systems in real-time with much greater detail than ever before. Min has demonstrated methods to observe individual molecules with chemical information, track the motion of small molecules in biological systems with tremendous accuracy, and detect dozens of different molecules simultaneously. The ability to image cells and tissues with this detail could significantly add to our understanding of the cellular world and the progression of disease, and could improve therapeutic tools and drug delivery methods.
Hosea M. Nelson, University of California, Los Angeles
Hosea M. Nelson, Ph.D., is an organic chemist breaking new ground in synthesizing and characterizing the small organic molecules that serve as precursors to chemicals we use every day, from plastics to medicine. Nelson has contributed to the development of microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED), a cutting-edge technique that can identify the structure of small molecules faster than ever, which can accelerate the production of new chemicals, like medicine and fuel. He has also discovered new reactions to create beneficial bioactive molecules using more sustainable catalysts, yielding more desired products than conventional catalytic methods. Nelson’s work even applies to medical diagnostics—he is developing next-generation genetic tests for diseases, including COVID-19, that may be faster and less expensive than PCR-based tests.
Sara Skrabalak, Indiana University
Synthesizing materials on the nanoscale is not the only tool scientists have to control a material’s properties. Inorganic and materials chemist Sara Skrabalak, Ph.D., is spearheading new efforts to shape and build the architecture of nanoparticles that can unlock new functionality. Skrabalak‘s methods and techniques can create nanoparticles with beautiful and complex shapes, rivaling even the complexity of snowflakes. She has demonstrated how these new structural features can promote and catalyze reactions, like the splitting of water molecules. Building on her understanding of nanoparticle synthesis, Skrabalak has developed methods for producing nanomaterials at scale and demonstrated the ability to “fingerprint” products using nanoparticles, potentially making counterfeiting more difficult.
Wenjun Zhang, University of California, Berkeley
Chemical engineer Wenjun Zhang, Ph.D., crosses the frontiers of chemical biology and biomolecular engineering in the field of “Natural Products Chemistry”—the study of substances produced by living organisms. Zhang’s research in how natural products behave offers pathways to cure disease and make industry more sustainable. Zhang has discovered novel natural products and tracked their motions in cells, gaining a better understanding of how pathogens behave and how they can be inhibited. Additionally, by studying the biological synthetic reactions of natural products, Zhang has developed a template for synthesizing common chemical precursors from renewable biological sources instead of fossil fuels.
2021 Blavatnik National Awards Finalists in Physical Sciences & Engineering
Aditya Akella, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Big data analytics, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce rely almost entirely on a datacenter’s capacity to process vast amounts of information. Aditya Akella, Ph.D., a computer scientist working on large-scale data networks, develops technologies that dramatically improve the speed and efficiency of datacenters while also enhancing the performance and reliability of typically bug-prone datacenter networks. By addressing fundamental challenges in datacenter networks and analytics, Akella’s research will continue to have a profound societal and scientific impact in areas such as health care, particle physics, climate modeling, and national security.
Andrea Alù, Advanced Sciences Research Center, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York
Engineer and physicist Andrea Alù, Ph.D., is challenging the limits of materials science, influencing a wide range of engineering applications in electromagnetics, nano-optics, and acoustics. By tailoring the interactions of electromagnetic and acoustic waves with artificial materials, Alù is demonstrating, both theoretically and experimentally, how cleverly designed nanostructured meta-materials can push the boundaries of physics. His work leads to new and enhanced material technologies with potential applications that include: cellular communications, energy harvesting, radar cloaking, optical computing, and nano-optics.
Kristen Grauman, University of Texas at Austin
Today, the capacity of computer technology to obtain and store images and video has outpaced the human capacity to analyze it effectively. Kristen Grauman, Ph.D., a computer scientist working in computer vision, aims to solve this problem by focusing her research on visual recognition and active perception. Grauman’s research has made large-scale crowdsourcing an indispensable tool for tasks in visual recognition, improved search times by orders of magnitude when searching millions of images, and pushed the frontiers of knowledge linking modern computer vision with robotics.
Asegun Henry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The unconventional energy storage technologies developed by mechanical engineer Asegun Henry, Ph.D., leverage the low cost of heat to convert and store electricity. The mechanical systems developed by Henry and his team allow extremely hot molten liquid metals, like tin, to be handled at record-breaking temperatures (> 1400°C). This technological breakthrough has enabled new, low-cost applications in renewable energy and fuel production. One such technology, coined “sun in a box,” converts and stores electricity from green energy technologies, like solar and wind, on-demand. His fundamental contributions to the physics of heat transfer are helping researchers re-imagine energy technologies.
Liangbing Hu, University of Maryland, College Park
Liangbing Hu, Ph.D., is a self-described “wood nanotechnologist”. His research explores the utilization of wood-derived nano-fibers—the most abundant biomaterial on Earth. He has used these nano-fibers to create engineered materials in systems to improve energy efficiency, to desalinate and filter water, and as environmentally-friendly building materials. Hu’s technological innovations have led to the development of a super-strong wood that is similar to steel in strength but six-times lighter, a transparent wood product that can serve as a replacement for glass with five-times better thermal insulation, a wood-based technology that cools a building’s temperature by almost 10°C without electricity, and a low-cost wood and water battery for large-scale energy storage on the electric grid.
Graham Neubig, Carnegie Mellon University
Graham Neubig, Ph.D., is re-shaping our understanding of how computer technologies can be used in applications such as personal assistants, translation apps, and search engines. As a computer scientist studying natural language processing, Neubig has a rich understanding of language and a mastery of the technical methods involved in machine learning. He has made significant contributions to the fundamental science behind applications such as machine translation, speech recognition, and question answering. The open-source software stemming from his research implements techniques used to process words, grammatical structure, and semantics and is widely used by research organizations and tech companies. Neubig’s research may one day make it possible for speakers of 7,000 different languages worldwide to communicate directly with each other, and with computers, in their own words.
Noah Planavsky, Yale University
Earth and planetary scientist Noah Planavsky, Ph.D. is rewriting the history of biological and environmental evolution on our planet. A scholar at the forefront of geochemical research, Planavsky has resolved long-standing geological mysteries regarding Earth’s evolutionary timeline with the help of novel tools that he developed. Using the rock record as a guide, his work has led to a new view of how the composition of Earth’s atmosphere has changed through time. His research provides the first clear evidence that photosynthesis emerged approximately three billion years ago, much earlier than previously thought, and he has helped shape our understanding of why the Earth has been persistently inhabited for billions of years. His research also lays the foundation for new ground and satellite telescope technologies that may be able to detect oxygen levels and identify potential signs of life on exoplanets beyond our solar system.
Kilian Weinberger, Cornell University
Computer scientist Kilian Weinberger, Ph.D., has introduced vastly new concepts in the rapidly evolving fields of machine learning and artificial intelligence. His novel approaches to machine learning represent the most radical departure seen in the past 30 years. New techniques, like “feature hashing” and novel neural network architectures—computer algorithms inspired by the brain’s biological structure and function, known as “DenseNets”—have made machine learning algorithms more efficient and have reduced data bias with real-world implications. Cloud services and self-driving car technologies are already using his techniques. His research could soon lead to vast improvements in medical imaging technologies that may facilitate early disease diagnosis.
Andrea Young, University of California, Santa Barbara
Physicist Andrea Young, Ph.D., is making waves in the burgeoning field of two-dimensional materials. His work on graphene van der Waals heterostructures—ultrathin materials made of single atomic layers stacked and held together by weak van der Waals forces—has enabled radical new approaches to materials design. The work has led to the experimental discovery of novel electronic phases of matter; for instance, magnets based on the spontaneous synchronization of the orbital motion of electron, and fractional Chern insulators, where electrons break apart to localizing a discrete fraction of their charge on the corners of a lattice. Researchers across the field have adopted the techniques and experimental breakthroughs realized in Young’s lab, which may one day play a significant role in quantum and classical electronic.
Guihua Yu, University of Texas at Austin
Guihua Yu, Ph.D., a materials scientist and nanotechnologist, focuses on designing and using sustainable polymer technologies to address vital energy and environmental problems facing society. He has created an exciting new line of polymeric materials, called energy hydrogels. Yu has pioneered an unprecedented level of multi-functionality in these materials, including the transmission of electricity via controlling their electron and ion transport. By simply tuning the way the polymer and water molecules interact, Yu’s hydrogel technologies have achieved record-breaking solar evaporation rates—as solar steam generators—in seawater desalination and water purification, solar-powered water-harvesters for sustainable agriculture, and next-generation energy storage materials for flexible, wearable electronics.
###
