鸦片战争和犹太人沙逊家族
By Mandai
01/10/2022
1838年，清政府派林则徐前往鸦片重灾区广东禁烟，次年林则徐扣留英国鸦片2万箱并将之销毁。面对惨重的损失，恼怒的犹太鸦片巨商大卫·沙逊联合众商人，要求英国政府为他们复仇并挽回损失，于是1840年中、英鸦片战争暴发，战争以中、英1842年签订《南京条约》结束。《南京条约》规定：1、割香港岛给英国；2、赔款2100万元（西班牙银元）；3、开放广州、厦门、福州、宁波、上海五处为通商口岸……
沙逊家族（Sassoon family），是一个具有伊拉克犹太人血统的国际知名家族，原本以巴格达为根据地，后来迁移至印度孟买，再扩散至中国、英国及世界各地。虽然其起源并未十分明确，但一般认为他们具有中世纪安达鲁斯地区最富有家族之一的伊本·秀珊（Ibn Shoshans）家族的血统。自18世纪开始，沙逊家族便成为全世界最富有家族之一，经营的事业领域扩及亚洲大陆各地。
沙逊·本·塞利（1750 – 1830）是巴格达的首席财政官。他的儿子大卫·沙逊（1792 – 1864）受到持反犹态度的新任行政长官的迫害，1828年带领全家逃到波斯湾港口布什尔，1832年又逃到印度孟买。他在孟买成立了经营国际贸易的沙逊洋行，把他从巴格达带来的家族成员安置在印度、缅甸、马来亚和中国的各个分支机构，并在每处供养一位拉比。他的富裕与慷慨众人皆知，他在中国的上海外滩建造的沙逊大厦成为当地的著名地标。
他的8个儿子继续向四方扩展。他的首任妻子所生的儿子，伊利亚斯·大卫·沙逊(E. D. Sassoon,1820 – 1880）在1844年在沙逊家族中的一个来到中国。后来他回到孟买，1867年离开公司另外成立新沙逊洋行，办事处设在香港和上海。曾经是中国最大的鸦片贩子。另一个儿子阿尔伯特·大卫·沙逊 (1818 – 1896)在父亲去世后继承了公司，以建造印度西部的第一个湿船坞沙逊码头（Sassoon Docks）而著称。后来他和2个兄弟一起成为英国的显要人物，以及威尔士亲王，后来的爱德华七世的密友。
May 21, 2021
在迁入英国的家族成员中，爱德华·阿尔伯特·沙逊爵士（1856 – 1912)，阿尔伯特之子，迎娶了艾琳·卡洛琳·罗斯柴尔德，而且从1899年直到去世一直是国会保守议员。该席位又由他的儿子菲利普·沙逊爵士（1888 – 1939) 继承，从1912年直到去世。菲利普爵士在第一次世界大战中秘密服务于英国陆军元帅道格拉斯·黑格爵士，在1920年代和 1930年代，担任英国空军副部长。20世纪英国诗人、传记作家和反战人士齐格弗里德·沙逊 (1886 – 1967)是大卫的曾孙。在英国的分支由于异族联姻导致基本上失去了犹太教信仰。
拉比所罗门·大卫·沙逊(1915 – 1985)则继续坚持祖先的传统，从莱奇沃思移居伦敦，1970年前往耶路撒冷。他收集犹太教著作和手稿，整理成2册目录。他是弗洛拉·亚伯拉罕的儿子，弗洛拉1901年从印度移居英国，在伦敦家中设立了著名的沙龙。
鸦片战争背后的幕后推手—沙逊犹太贩毒家族
By 星辰猎人
01/10/2022
导语：二次鸦片战争战败，加之境内海量的吸毒人群，使得我们背上了“东亚病夫”的称号。然而大多数人并不知道，向中国输入最多鸦片的其实是一群犹太贩毒集团，其中规模最大、持续时间最长的是沙逊家族所开办的沙逊洋行。沙逊家族通过贩卖毒品获得了巨额利润，使得该家族享有东方罗斯柴尔德家族之称。
犹太贩毒集团——两次鸦片战争的受益者
1840至1842年英国发动第一次鸦片战争，最终以南京条约的签订而结束，此后中国逐渐沦为半殖民地半封建社会。中国战败之后，鸦片如同洪水一样涌入，使得国民身体素质急剧下降，经济水平每况愈下。
1856年至1860年英法两国对中国又发起了第二次鸦片战争，英法联军攻占北京后火烧圆明园，并逼迫清政府签订相关条约。第二次鸦片战争的后果是——列强涌入中国的鸦片，清政府只能收取一次税。
在第一次鸦片战争之前，林则徐给英国女皇写过一封信，信中说：“查该国距内地六七万里，而夷船争来贸易者，为获利之厚故耳。以中国之利利外夷，是夷人所获之厚利，皆从华民分去。岂有反以毒物害华民之理。即夷人未必有心为害，而贪利之极，不顾害人，试问天良安在？闻该国禁食甚严，是固明知之为害也。既不使为害于该国，则他国尚不可移害，况中国乎？”
这封信的核心意思是，你们英国人不吸鸦片，却拿鸦片来害我们，这太无耻了！
可惜，林则徐的看法其实并不完全正确。
英国人在19世纪确实不“吸”鸦片，但他们“喝”鸦片酒（鸦片酊 Laudanum），不单是英国，整个欧洲都流行“喝”。曾经派使者见乾隆皇帝的英王乔治三世就是一个鸦片酒鬼，乔治三世发疯也是因为这个原因，后来的继任者乔治四世同样喜欢喝鸦片酒。
鸦片战争前夕，即1837年登基的维多利亚女王非常讨厌鸦片，她认为鸦片酊令英国男人失去了阳刚之气，喝鸦片酒的男人个个都是病鬼，但她并没有在法律层面禁止喝鸦片酒。
彼时的中国，通常把吸食鸦片叫做抽大烟。在雍正年间，清政府已经意识到鸦片带来的危害，并时常施行禁烟措施，但是由于民间一直把鸦片当成一种灵丹妙药，这些禁烟措施往往收效甚微。
林则徐早年是一个坚定的禁烟者，但是在晚年却对鸦片产生了180度的态度转变，提出了种植罂粟来弥补财政空缺、并抵御外国鸦片的看法，这是因为他看到鸦片种植所带来的巨大财政收入。
在普通人眼中还有一个认识错误——第一次鸦片战争期间向中国倾销毒品的主体是东印度公司。
这个观点是有误的，在第一次鸦片战争中，东印度公司卖鸦片的比例可以忽略不计，当时英国政府已经把鸦片经营权从东印度公司让渡给了犹太鸦片贩子。
因此向中国直接贩卖鸦片的不是英国政府，也不是东印度公司，而是向英国政府缴纳了大量税金的家族式犹太贩毒集团。不过这些犹太家族都是英国国籍，说英国人向中国输入鸦片毒品也没有错。
犹太贩毒家族的来历
犹太民族流浪了几千年，根据流浪的位置主要存在以下几个分支：
第一支德系犹太人（Ashkenazim）；
第二支西班牙系犹太人（Sephardim）；
第三支阿拉伯系犹太人（Mizrahim）；
第四支非洲系犹太人（Ethiopian）。
贩卖鸦片的犹太人主要是西班牙系塞法迪犹太人（Sephardi Jews），历史上长期生活在伊比利亚半岛上（西班牙、葡萄牙两国），大约占犹太人总数的20%。
1553年，葡萄牙人用欺骗的手段占据了澳门，塞法迪犹太人跟着葡萄牙人向中国贩卖鸦片，但是量并不大。从已有的资料来看，当时明朝一年进口的鸦片也就100来箱，塞法迪犹太人占据的比例最多也就5、6箱。
犹太贩毒家族主要有：沙逊(Sassoon)、嘉道理(Kadoorie)、哈同(Hardoon)、亚伯拉罕(Abraham)、所罗门(Solomon)、埃兹拉(Ezra)、托依格(Toeg)、海亦姆(Hayim)、索福(Sopher)等家族，其中最有名的是沙逊家族。
自1840年以来，犹太人的鸦片生意逐渐由沙逊家族主导，也由此成为当时全球最大的贩毒集团。
大卫·沙逊——贩毒家族的开创者
如果单纯以贩毒数量作为衡量标准，大卫·沙逊可谓是史上最大的毒品贩子，后世的任何毒枭、毒品贩子都无法与其相提并论。他和其他毒枭最大的区别在于，他的罪行没有人记得。
1792年，大卫·沙逊出生在巴格达（当时属奥斯曼帝国管辖）一个富裕的犹太家庭，30岁之前生活过得顺风顺水，任职当地首席财政官，直到1821年新来了一位行政长官，他的美好人生起了波折。
新行政长官叫达乌德，上任就杀了一位叫埃兹拉的犹太人族长，大卫·沙逊看到新上司对犹太人杀气腾腾，连忙私下越级打报告，请求奥斯曼帝国政府将达乌德撤职查办。
得知大卫打小报告后，达乌德立刻展开反击，他以大卫·沙逊开银行放高利贷、贪污受贿之类的理由，同样上报给政府，企图将其定罪。达乌德的报告得到了一些高级官员的认可，大卫·沙逊形势岌岌可危。
大卫·沙逊一看情况对自己不利，立马在1829年带领全家逃亡，辗转多地后，在1832年获得英国国籍，紧接着第二年就把全部家族财产转移到了印度孟买，并定居下来。
这一年任印度孟买总督的罗伯特·格兰特正利用各种势力影响英国议会，想要通过一则法令，来废止东印度公司对华贸易的专利权和垄断特权。有阴谋论者认为，英国政府做出这个决定，是大卫·沙逊等一票犹太家族背后的游说、行贿有很大关系。
法案通过后，大卫·沙逊在孟买设立了沙逊洋行，经营着英国、印度的棉纺织品、东方织物、波斯湾土特产等贸易，以及向中国走私鸦片。凭借着犹太人的经商天赋，大卫·沙逊很快就成为孟买最富有的人之一。
与此同时，原本顺风顺水的东印度公司，主营的鸦片生意突然一落千丈，到了1840年，东印度公司经营的鸦片生意已经可以忽略不计。
另一边，沙逊洋行经营着很多生意，但最赚钱的行当还是向中国走私鸦片，销量实在太好了，连他的竞争对手都眼红地说道：“黄金雪片似地向大卫·沙逊飞去。”
沙逊洋行的鸦片走私也给英国政府带来了巨大的财富，顺便也解决了中英之间巨大的贸易逆差。基于经济利益的考虑，极度反感鸦片的维多利亚女王突然转变态度，支持并命令英国政府授予沙逊贩毒家族更大更多的权利，如在棉制品、丝绸等贸易中给予沙逊洋行更大的便利，尤其是在生产鸦片的环节给予更大的政策倾斜。
资料显示1836年鸦片贸易量超过3万箱（不包括偷税漏税的走私鸦片），97%以上是被犹太鸦片商贩控制，沙逊家族控制量一般认为是在20%左右。大卫·沙逊以及他两个妻子所生的八个儿子全部都全身心地投入鸦片贸易之中，他们赚到的钱，数都数不过来。
第一次鸦片战争后的沙逊洋行的崛起
道光十八年，即1838年英国鸦片商贩遇到了麻烦，道光皇帝派时任湖广总督兼兵部尚书的林则徐，以钦差大臣的身份前往广州禁烟。一场影响中国上百年历史的禁烟运动，就此拉开序幕。
林则徐到了广州，就立刻逼迫以沙逊洋行为首的英国犹太毒贩交出走私鸦片，并在虎门进行集中销毁，根据清朝的官方记录显示，总共销毁了1万9千多箱鸦片。
看着被销毁的鸦片，犹太商贩们心疼不已，更心疼的是以后不能继续贩卖鸦片。于是以大卫·沙逊为主的犹太家族，出钱出力游说英国政府替他们出头，挽回经济损失。
沙逊家族和另一个非常有势力的犹太家族，即罗斯柴尔德家族是亲家，这个家族按当时的话来说，主要是放钱，即高利贷的，虽然没有经营贩卖鸦片生意，但与沙逊家族有着非常深厚的合作与利益关系。
于是鸦片战争的起源有这么一种说法，正是由于沙逊家族与罗斯柴尔德家族的共同游说，才使得英国议会以微弱的优势，投票通过了英国政府发动对华的惩罚战争。这一幕，在谢晋导演的《鸦片战争》电影中再现了。
然而根据最新的资料显示，英国议会却是以271票反对、262票支持的结果，否决了对华战争法案，但此时英国的舰队已经在前往中国的路上。也就是说，英国发动的第一次鸦片战争，并非议会决定，而是由当时的英国首相授权。
鸦片战争之后，英国政府一直诡辩，他们发起的是一场关于贸易的战争，只字不提鸦片。马克思看不下去这种无耻说法，专门撰文揭露并批判英国政府，在第一次鸦片战争结束16年后，即1858年写过一篇《鸦片贸易》的文章，里面重点批判了英国政府既要做婊子又要立牌坊的做法！
“英国政府以帝国政府的资格，装作与鸦片贸易全无关系，甚至订立禁止这种贸易的法令。可是又强迫孟加拉省种植鸦片，最后运往加尔各答，由政府标价拍卖，把它从国家官吏手中移交给投机商人，然后转入走私商人的手中，运入中国……”
从综合资料来看，林则徐收缴的鸦片中有接近一半是沙逊家族的。因此可以说，第一次鸦片战争，就是英国政府为沙逊家族为首的犹太毒贩发动的。
第一次鸦片战争后，大卫·沙逊迅速出手，带领八个儿子，先后在香港、广州、上海成立沙逊洋行。其中上海的业务发展最好，尤其是鸦片业务，因此上海很快就变成沙逊洋行在华的业务中心，其地位远超香港和广州。
《中华文明与犹太资本的关系已经质变》
张捷 | 中科院
12/21/2021
张捷，男，祖籍河北唐山，毕业于中国科学技术大学，先后从事多个行业并多有建树，现为中国政法大学资本金融研究院兼职教授 [1] 、北京量跃资本管理有限公司的法人 [2] 、北京市金章科技发展有限公司董事 [3] 、《环球财经》副总编、国务院发展研究中心国际技术经济研究所客座研究员，中央电视台、中国国际广播电台、中经网特约评论员、律师、金融地产投资人。2006年来发表了许多有影响力的著作和文章，涉及政治、经济、法律、历史等多方面，因其视角独特，思维敏捷，逻辑缜密而引起较大反响。已出版的著作有《信用战》、《房势》、《房噬》、《涨价的世界》、《资源角逐》、《霸权博弈》《定价权》 [4] 、《网络霸权》 [5] 、《拼娃——学霸世家谈教育》 [6] 等。
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%BC%A0%E6%8D%B7/28118
Dec 21, 2021
中科院张捷：
今年不写展望与回顾了，发一篇重磅文章吧，这个文章可能是未来十年百年的一个展望分析。
一直写新年的展望和过去一年的回顾的，不过现在越来越敏感，以前的展望很多很准确但就被和谐了，今年不写了，但发一篇重磅文章吧，这个文章可能是未来十年百年的一个展望分析。
《中华文明与犹太资本关系已经质变》
中国人对犹太人是没有任何恶意的，而且是充满了好感，对犹太人的成功的宣传，也在我们各种媒体上展现，对犹太人与中国的关系，犹太资本与中国的关系，我们其实认识还是非常的表面化和短期化，而在中国2020年以后，中国进入到崛起的关键阶段，与犹太资本的关系，笔者认为已经发生质变，再也不是当年的关系了，就如中美关系质变一样。
最近有学者公开说中国让步华尔街，而华尔街搞不定特朗普，笔者认为真实的原因不是华尔街搞不定特朗普，而是中国与犹太资本的质变，中国原有的让步犹太金融资本的思维走不通了，犹太金融资本与特朗普是有关系的，特朗普的女儿已经皈依了犹太教，特朗普对犹太人是特别买账的，他承认了耶路撒冷是以色列首都，是其他美国总统都没有承认的。中国诉求不是华尔街搞不定特朗普，而是犹太人对中国人的态度已经改变，但这个改变，他们不会说出来，而且尽可能不让你早察觉。
1、犹太人与美国人不等同
首先要说的是犹太资本不等同于美国，犹太资本是跨国的国际资本，犹太资本在近代史上，就是在各国之间流动，与西方的民族国家、宗教国家是有很多矛盾的，与伊斯兰国家也是相爱相杀，关系比大家想的要复杂。而犹太资本与中国，更多的是远香近臭，历史上没有直接的巨大冲突，而且在互惠互利上，还有一些美好的传说。中国人是对世界普遍存在善意的，但一神教的民族，对异教徒都是猜忌和丑化的。
犹太人与中国人关系好，犹太资本与中国关系好，背景是一直在中国赚钱，而且赚钱还是别人留下了仇恨。中国近代的屈辱史，不断的开放口岸财富外流，输入鸦片和战争的，是西方海盗民族，赚钱是犹太资本，所以有盎格鲁撒克逊犹太黄金资本联盟的说法，盎格鲁撒克逊人是当海盗拿刀的，赚钱吃豆腐的是有犹太资本的。黄金本位货币金融掠夺，也是犹太人的。犹太人在中国的近代史上是赚了银子还立了牌坊。
犹太人还是西方主要强国的幕后统治者，对资本主义社会，是统治者在幕后的，前台是代理人。尤其是在实行联邦制搞共和的国家，当初法国革命，国王倒台，就是财政破产还不起犹太人的债，后来法国支持独立的美国，又是犹太资本的舞台，犹太资本是需要寄生在一个强大的主权国家的。
犹太人同时又是多方下注的，犹太人与各个可能成为世界强国的国家都保持良好的关系，以求避免某个国家的衰落，给犹太人的利益造成影响。所以犹太资本，其实是一个跨国资本，其寄生的国家，就变成空心化和国际化，然后可能又是另外的寄主国家。
特朗普是为了美国利益的，美国利益不是犹太人的利益，虽然特朗普对犹太人有很多的让步，但他与犹太人并不是利益共同体。而拜登和建制派，更多的是与犹太人的利益是捆绑的。全球化的背后，犹太资本与美国国力，同时与中国为敌是不利的。其实盎格鲁撒克逊人与犹太人的关系，虽然是盟友，但还是有所不同的，尤其是在美国的霸权进入衰落的状态下，这个差别就变得越来越明显了。
特朗普的支持者美国的红脖子，最早到美国的盎格鲁人，他们其实在美国也是被犹太资本搞到底层，而且犹太白左纵容黑墨绿的权利，影响的是红脖子的权利，而在教育领域，犹太人占据的也是白人红脖子的资源，他们是存在矛盾的，但舆论是被完全的压制。所以特朗普虽然女婿犹太人，虽然给了犹太人诸多好处，但红脖子支持的背景，也是犹太资本抛弃他的主要原因之一。在红脖子等白人盎格鲁群体越来越底层的时候，犹太资本与美国的差异，也是不断扩大的。
2、犹太人统治世界的历史
我们中国人对犹太人在中世纪的认识，把犹太人看作一直是受迫害的底层。这个是犹太人宣传的印象，其实也是不全面的。其逻辑就如我们知道阉割的太监一般是底层，但不能把大宦官，也当作底层是一样的。大宦官，可以当作统治者的一员，起码要算作统治者代理人阶层的顶层。
在中世纪的欧洲，由于教会禁止放贷获取利益，西方王权贵族们往往需要招募一些犹太人，来帮助自己从事非法活动，他们与宫廷贵族关系密切。他们被叫做宫廷犹太人，也被称为“受保护的犹太人”。类似的可以看看罗斯柴尔德家族史，犹太资本，犹太人与盎格鲁撒克逊的结盟，都与他们这类特殊的身份地位有关。而我们说盎格鲁撒克逊犹太资本联盟，这个联盟应当是在文艺复兴之后就建立了，那个时候犹太人已经是联盟的一方，是主导世界的主要力量之一，甚至这个联盟是在资产阶级革命之前，对犹太人的力量，是要重新客观认识的。
作为王权和贵族的代理人，甚至是一些宗教神职人员私利的代理人，这些犹太人天然就是国际化的。他们通过国际交易，为各方寻求利益和自己渔利，所以他们的行为，得到西方贵族势力的一致保护。所以犹太人这个族群，2000年没有自己的土地和国家，其实也有两面性。因为他们真的是有自己效忠的国家，反而很多国王和贵族们不敢用他们了！他们当中的顶尖阶层，是带有某些故意成分不占有土地而建国，作为国际上的代理人是非常得利的，因此很长时间建立一个国家不是不能而是不那么在意。直到被极端的纳粹攻击以后，才变成了建立国家成为他们最重要的事情。以色列是他们购买土地建立的，其实在西方殖民的几百年，二战以前购买殖民地建国，本身一直不是特别困难的事情。
而随着欧洲让各国国际均势的政治思维，基督教等宗教的教派纷争，西方世界的主权国家、王权贵族和宗教势力被逐步削弱，导致代理人的力量坐大，作为各方代理人的犹太金融势力就崛起了，走上了幕后统治者的舞台。
从英国的资产阶级革命，到法国大革命，革命的资产阶级是谁？当年拥有和掌控西方金融和资产的，主要不就是作为代理人的犹太人么！所谓的革命，就是要取得统治权的。
在如此背景下，一些犹太家族崛起，通过革命和妥协，最后使得后来犹太金融资本、教会和贵族三分权力，成为了西方资本社会的三权分立结构，这样的结构又扩大到了美洲，建立了美国的金融体系，通过美国的崛起，统治了全球。
这样的家族，例如沃伯格家族就是这么起家的，后来在保罗·沃伯格的主导下，1913年正式建立美联储，成为美联储第二任副主席，被称作“美联储的总设计师”。现在沃伯格家族的投资，与中国网络新兴产业密切相关，很多中国网络大公司就有他们的股权。他们也积极的向中国进行渗透。
这里我们还要说的就是印度最近很多人在美国成为了高管，而且印度也在西南与中国找事情，背后其实犹太人与印度人的关系是比中国紧密的多的。当年英国殖民印度，与英国合作到印度赚钱的就是犹太人。英国退出印度，所谓的不流血的革命，印度的核心资产的归属权其实是没有变的，印度被犹太资本控制的事实，我们要看清楚，所以印度人能够在美国等西方国家大公司当高管，没有华人管理人员晋升的玻璃天花板，与犹太资本与印度人的历史关系是分不开的。
现在美国搞的全球化，背后是犹太金融资本的全球化。这个全球化所追求的，就是要在全球建立起犹太资本的秩序，进行资本的幕后统治，实现的是犹太资本在全球的单极化。美国的单极化是霸权、军事、政治的单极化，犹太资本追求的是经济、金融的单极化，都是要统治世界！这是与中国崛起民族复兴，构成了根本性的矛盾，对此中国要认识清楚。
3、犹太人与国际资本
现代中国与犹太人的关系，一直是犹太人是世界的主导，主导当今资本社会、工业社会、金融社会以及网络社会，中国是给犹太人送钱的，而且中国与美国的对抗和斡旋，犹太人也是调和双方关系的重要角色，在这个过程当中，犹太人是在中美两国都是赚钱的。
犹太人不等于美国，犹太人在离岸港有大量的资本，具体多少并不透明。2012年路透社麦肯锡等做了一个估计是全球立案资本是32万亿美元，另外该研究估计自1970年起，到2010年为止，139个国家的最富人群已经累积了7.3万亿至9.3万亿“未被记录的离岸资产”。此后世界没有其他公开的数据。当然这些资产里面，有很多不是犹太人的，但犹太人的资产是其中的大部分。所以，犹太人与犹太资本，外在的表现，更像一种中立的国际资本。
在离岸港有大量的国际金融资本，犹太资本很多是脱离国家存在的，犹太资本不等同于美国，但美国的全球化是为犹太资本服务的，离岸港的巨额资本都是得益于美国的全球化政策而存在的，但特朗普的政策，对离岸港的资本是一个打击。美国对离岸港的征税政策，可以看做是美国人与犹太资本的一个摩擦。
在离岸港构架VIE结构，控制世界各国的重要经济和规避各国法律和税收，是犹太人的
方式。现在已经受到了美国带头的围剿收税，但对中国的影响依然是巨大的。中国在美国上市企业，大量的资本结构在离岸港。而中国等发展中国家的产业，大量是犹太资本投资的。
同时犹太人在欧洲也是具有大量的历史财富，在二战后的清算当中，犹太人夺回了大量原来属于他们的资产。而引发欧洲的反犹浪潮，背景也是欧洲的主要财富被犹太人控制，当年的德国甚至达到了90%以上。
苏东的巨变，让犹太资本在前苏联解体当中取得了巨大的财富。俄罗斯金融寡头的组成，并非自由派们到处宣扬的是苏联主要领导及其子女亲属们，所谓的腐败的财富转移很多很常见但是对于控制国家的新崛起的寡头们实际上并不成立，这些人中的主力，别列佐夫斯基、古辛斯基、霍多尔科夫斯基、斯摩棱斯基、弗里德曼、阿列克别洛夫、阿布拉莫维奇等等，他们在苏联时代大部分都是社会普通阶层成员，也没有太大的财富积累，但他们都有一个共同的特点：都是犹太人。考虑到俄罗斯1.5亿人口中，俄罗斯裔占
大多数，犹太裔只有25万左右，不到0.2%，名列各民族26位，这个现象显然是令人印象深刻的。
犹太人的资本统治世界，还有各种的基金会，基金会可以透过世袭继承等等壁垒。基金会是各种免税的，是国际资本的重要主体，而且搞所谓的“慈善事业”！其实“慈善事业”的本质就是一种统治的方式，类似中国古代的田氏代齐！让政府干讨人厌的事情，而做好事则资本来，把应当给政府的税收拿过来，资本自己来。所以基金会就是幕后统治的一种方式。别说中国人不愿意搞慈善，中国人很愿意搞田氏代齐的！所以在中国搞慈善的沈万三是一定要死的。
所以犹太资本，不光是美国，而是一个全球的存在，是国际化、全球化的，深刻的影响着世界。
4、犹太人在教育和科技的霸权
我们总看到说聪明的犹太人怎么教育孩子的文章，很多都是所谓的“素质”鸡汤，通过教育分层的，而犹太人，其实就是全球教育资源顶层的垄断者。
对犹太人控制世界的手段，我们总看见资本、金融层面，其实犹太人在教育和金融层面才是更关键的。犹太人当初是考试才接受入教的，仅仅要高技术人员。后来就是在西方社会崛起的过程当中，犹太科学家也是在世界的顶端，犹太人统治世界，就是到处散布宽松不学的鸡汤，让西方的贵族是四肢发达，而普通人是快乐不学，但犹太人是最重视教育的民族。中国人认不清鸡汤，要吃大亏的。
犹太人对中国人崛起的限制，你看一下美国名校入学的族裔细分，他们会细分犹太人么？犹太人入学是什么样的比例呢？在教育上限制华人，限制中华文明。包括在教育的评价体系上，我们总关注诺贝尔奖，其实这个奖项与犹太人的关系也很紧密，不给中国人得奖是政治正确。所以得不得奖中国不必太在意的。
中国真的应该在意的，是犹太人对科学是有信仰的，是有信仰的族群。犹太教对科学的支持非常大，所以有大群犹太人为了信仰和真理去研究，而且他们的研究是得到族群和教会内的支持的，而且受人尊敬这个精神支持比物质支持重要。中国则是做不了冷板凳长期研究高深问题，而且会被妖魔化为“陈景润”式的书呆子，还编排了各种段子进行嘲笑，差距是巨大的。
犹太人占据全球教育顶端，比如同样的华裔和犹太人都只占美国人口的2%，但在哈佛大学，犹太学生的比例达25％左右。在如今的常青藤盟校，犹太学生的比例达23％，比其在美国人口中的比例高出十几倍。犹太人其实也是淘汰其他“白人”的，比如在宾夕法尼亚大学，三分之一的学生是犹太人，而非犹太白人成了最大的受害者。他们在入学时和犹太人同属于“白人”，名额本来已经受到控制，又因读书远不及犹太人而被大量淘汰。这个比例简单估算，就是对美国人和华裔是高一个数量级的，对大陆孩子上名校，是高两个数量级的。为何不如亚裔细分一样，把美国白人的族裔也细分一下，保障一下最早到达美国的“红脖子”呢？这背后就是犹太人的力量。
西方的数学也是越来越简单，上图是西方教育学者的感叹。
让美国的普及教育越来越简单，背后其实是对美国白人也来了一个教育分层，保护犹太人在美国的教育资源高端，而其他西方发达国家，到处鸡汤说不学的，情况也基本如此。就如德国讲车库啥的，犹太人的孩子是在车库当技工培养的么？！而美国的好大学犹太人占据25%，看看犹太人在总人口里面才多少比例，这意味着犹太人上名校的比例是其他民族的多少倍，而且是犹太本民族的孩子，是大比例进入名校的，是带有教育特权的。
美国这一次限制中国高科技，限制华人进入美国的名校，其实背后就是犹太人。对中国的教育鸡汤其实也有他们的影子。犹太人是忽悠全球各个民族都快乐不学，自己却占据教育资源最多和猛学的民族。犹太人对世界教育高端资源的掌控，是犹太人掌控世界非常关键的层面。中国人取得世界教育高端资源的路很长，对中国人的留学学科的限制，其实是有犹太资本的影子的。
犹太人有很多教育鸡汤，好多文章在讲犹太人怎么教育子女放养而成功，不讲的是犹太人占据全球的教育资源，其很多鸡汤的背后是教育特权世袭。犹太人在美国获得的教育资源是在美华人和美国的10倍的样子，如果族裔细分就是几十倍，对在大陆的孩子上名校，犹太人的比例机会是100倍。犹太人没有升学竞争压力的从容，当然可以白莲花。而且美国通过教育分层，犹太人通过教育把持美国以及西方世界的幕后统治权，这一点很多人是看不到的。同样的升学比例中国做不到的，中国教育的焦虑在于教育的激烈竞争，而借助焦虑挑唆中国私货政策和减负，限制天才孩子取得教育资源倾斜的会，从而限制华裔牛娃，避免犹太人在全球范围受到中国牛娃的竞争，中国其实是被犹太人的买办渗透最多的。
中国的中学教育，大纲是天花板，而犹太人确实是大学的先修课程进入中学。对顶尖的孩子，不搞竞赛，就是在大纲天花板下内卷化，而且教育部还搞了减负想要降低内卷，但竞争激烈下根本就是走向问题的反面。犹太孩子中学没有减负，是苦学的，而且苦学不为升学竞争，可以更有效率。而到了大学，中国的大学是严进宽出，内卷化的低水平进来，还要搞宽出，结果的水平就是越来越低。而犹太人占多数的大学，都是宽进严出的，在大学会进一步的拉开与其他族群的差距。当然，中国人很聪明，但在顶尖的教育领域，就是被犹太人的不同体制和政策拉开了差距。
中国人的普及教育搞的非常好，但犹太人是居于世界的高端，他们占据的就是世界教育和科技的顶尖，他们在全球是不要普及教育的，高端都占据了，对他们的族群已经是普及教育了。顶尖的教育和顶尖的科技，才是民族的高度和核心竞争力。因为犹太人是没有人口基数的，他们必须要高端，而且估计漫灌不学鸡汤，矮化低端，拉开差距。而中国加强民族基础教育固然重要，但民族的顶尖高度要能够与之竞争才是关键，现在中国对天才孩子缺乏顶尖的教育倾斜，导致的就是科技天花板和卡脖子，以后的竞争力是有问题的。
不要以为留学能够解决问题，移民能够解决问题，同样的人数，海外华人在顶尖学校，占据顶尖教育资源的水平远远不如犹太人，而且还被族裔细分给卡死了，与犹太人差距是10倍到100倍的差别！中华民族要有足够的顶尖教育资源完成民族复兴大业，只能是国内的基础教育解决，只能是国内的英才教育体系解决。而现在中国的教育体系，从思想到人员，都被渗透的非常厉害。连中国几千年的诗书传家传统，都有教育部支持的大V跳出来批判；中国几千年的劝学传统，现在被教育部变成了不学禁学；中国几千年的笨鸟先飞传统，现在被教育部变成了非法抢跑！反智的逻辑为啥那么多，大家要想想了。
科技无国界，是犹太人叫出来的，科技领域也是犹太人主导的。现在科技对中国而言是有国界，科学家有祖国。科技上限制中国人，是表明了犹太人对中国人态度的转变。祖国的概念，主要是中国人的概念，移民国家没有，犹太人长期欧洲游走，更是没有祖国的概念了。当初无国界，是要维护犹太人的利益的，现在限制中国，一样是维护犹太人的利益，他们没有啥永恒的普世价值，或者他们的普世价值就是精致利己。
中国与犹太资本的竞争，科技落后其实根源在于教育落后，而下一代的成长没有赶超机会，就永远没有不可能翻身的。中华崛起，与犹太人在顶端的竞争越来越激烈，遏制中国崛起，猛灌教育鸡汤，也是犹太人对待其他族群一贯的做法。
5、犹太摩萨德刀与银莲花
犹太人的军事恐怖组织和情报网，也是比中华民族要更广布的。政治、经济和军事以及情报，是不分家的。中华民族在全球的情报能力，是与犹太资本无法比的。
犹太人的强大情报能力，以及情报组织对国家的掌控，对反对犹太人的力量进行武力打击，这些层面的力量，犹太资本是无比强大的，犹太人的情报组织是得到国家保护，拥有主权，不受各国法律约束的。
以色列建立了摩萨德（Mossad），全称为以色列情报和特殊使命局（The Institute
for Intelligence and Special Operations），与美国中央情报局、克格勃（改制为
俄罗斯联邦安全局）和英国军情六处，并称为“世界四大情报机构”。由以色列军方于1948年建立，以大胆、激进、诡秘称著于世。自从成立以来，摩萨德进行了多次让世界震动的成功行动。摩萨德本身就有很强的恐怖组织色彩，在犹太复国运动还是武装恐怖状态的时候，其前身在以色列独立以前，巴勒斯坦地区有一个犹太秘密军事组织“哈加纳”（意为“防务”），这个组织是为了专门、有组织地向巴勒斯坦地区犹太人秘密购买武装、偷运武器和组织非法移民而成立的，而为这些活动收集情报的则是一个附属“哈加纳”的“沙亚”情报机构。
摩萨德与其他国家的情报机构不同，摩萨德是可调兵的，是有军权的，所以它是犹太的一把统治世界的刀。而维护犹太人的利益，对反犹的暗杀行动，其实对各国的政客都是巨大的影响。不要简单的以为以色列是美国的附庸，而实际上是犹太资本掌握美国金融和经济命脉，同时摩萨德的武力还威胁反对犹太利益的政客，谁控制谁真的是不好说。
犹太人的意识形态建设是非常厉害的，反犹的都会受到经济和武力的打压，甚至是恐怖主义的方式，对待中东伊斯兰对手就是如此，就如刚刚不久发生的刺杀伊朗科学家的事情，现在已经证实就是摩萨德干的，是不是恐怖主义，其实只不过是你的立场问题。犹太人在当年纳粹打压过后，很多事情是经过了反思的。摩萨德的刀是非常锋利的。
以色列的世界“四大情报组织”的摩萨德(Mossad)，最近把中国研制的新冠疫苗，偷偷带回到了以色列。
从以色列的《耶路撒冷邮报》到英国的《每日快报》，再到阿拉伯国有电视台(Al Arabiya)，阿塞拜疆的azerbaycan24，印度的泰米尔语日报daily thanthi，全世界大大小小，不同国家，不同语言的媒体都在报道这个消息。
所以在全球经济领域，我们与犹太人，可能首先就要发生情报战！中国要，全球需要建设中国的情报系统，与犹太人的冲突，就很可能发生。
犹太人对世界另外的掌控，可以体现在媒体舆论等的掌控上，反犹的声音是听不到的，相比这些，中国是做不到的，犹太人会打的，就是悲情牌，似乎犹太人一直是受到欺压的民族。而实际上，犹太人在中世纪就是占据了社会的顶端，就是被其他民族憎恨的，就如《威尼斯商人》里面的夏洛克一样，文学是源于生活的，前面提到的宫廷犹太人的历史，一般人都没有概念，中国人的概念里面，对犹太人普遍存在好感，而真实的犹太人在西方社会，其实更像夏洛克那样。
我们可以看看以色列的国花，选这个花的传说和含义，可以很好的体会。
以色列国花银莲花
犹太人的国花银莲花，是由花神芙洛拉（Flora）的嫉妒变来的。神话是说，嫉妒阿莲莫莲（Anemone）和风神瑞比修斯恋情的芙洛拉，把阿莲莫莲变成了银莲花。也有另一种说法是，美神阿芙洛狄忒（Aphrodite）所爱的美少年阿多尼斯（Adonis），在狩猎时被野兽所杀，从他胸口中流出的鲜血，就变成了银莲花。因此，银莲花是一种凄凉而寂寞的花。银莲花的花语和象征意义为：1.失去希望 2.渐渐淡薄的爱3.期待被抛弃 。
犹太人选这样的花，是带有很大的创伤情怀的，在二战当中的被屠杀，是抹不去的历史记忆，也是他们的民族性。犹太人长期没有朋友，没有盟友，可以忍受孤独。而犹太人与其他国家，追求的是寄生关系，没有中国人想的共赢，他们要的是独占独赢。与中国的共赢，见者有份，集体主义，都是不同的民族性格。
但犹太人给你灌注的是白左，是人畜无害，是娘化、娱乐化。西方的白左盛行，与犹太人推动的意识型态是有关系的。白左反对所谓极右势力，都符合犹太人的需要。这些被白左反对的右翼势力，一般都是保护其他民族利益和反犹的。白左的意识形态，对犹太人的生存是非常有利的，这也是犹太人花的一面。而中国的白左，牧羊犬公知等等，对犹太人的态度和关系，可能比对美国还要媚态。
犹太人影响世界的统治力，是刀与花并存的，而且也是深度的向中国渗透的，远远比我们渗透他们，对他们的了解要多得多。如果你反犹，他们有刀，如果他们妖魔化你，表面上还是花一样，他们会策动其他民族的白左来干事情。
6、犹太教是更狭隘极端
说犹太人就离不开犹太教，犹太人和犹太教二者带有同一性，民族和宗教不分。犹太教与另外的两大一神教有一个本质的不同：犹太教是不讲传教的！基督教、佛教等等都是要传教的，基督教把传教放到了关键位置。而伊斯兰教则用刀和火来传教，是要武力征服皈依的。但犹太教基本不传教，你想要要加入犹太教，也是不容易的。犹太教在一个非常封闭的群体！
犹太教只有古代的拉比犹太教接受新的皈依者，而且皈依要考试。该教需要的是知识分子和手工业者，保持犹太人族群的技术优势，这个也是犹太人没有被杀光的原因，也是犹太人科学发达的原因之一。另外就是当年处死科学“异端”的极端事件当中，可不仅仅是简单的因为反对科学，而是带有很强的宗教背景！伽利略、哥白尼、布鲁诺等人都是共济会和光明会的成员，是以犹太教为背景，以科学为手段，来质疑其他宗教的公信力的。
犹太教徒坚信自己是神的“特选子民”，这一点也与其他三大宗教不同，犹太教不光是有信仰上对异教徒的歧视，更在血统上，把自己变成了高贵的血统，其实种族歧视在犹太教的骨髓里面，是比其他任何宗教都要严苛的。这个种族的歧视，才是他们不对外传教的原因，不是这个种族的，连你信仰他们宗教的资格都没有。犹太人被种族歧视的背后，是他们的教义首先就是歧视其他民族的，不光是歧视异教徒。犹太人是以宗教包裹下的极端种族主义者，这个比其他西方宗教更隐秘和疯狂。
犹太教的禁忌其实更严格，犹太教比伊斯兰教，不仅仅不能吃猪肉，连兔子等伊斯兰可以吃的动物肉也是不能吃的，而且不能肉与奶一起吃，保留的是对其他民族的区别意识。猪肉、杂食动物的肉、兔子肉等等是农耕民族离不开的，他们只吃草食动物，是游牧民族的习性，但他们不游牧，是以商业控制游牧民族的。这个与中国农耕为本，家的字形就是屋内有猪，民族性有本质的差别。
为了保持部落血统的纯正性，犹太人实行“内婚制”，也就是宗族内近亲结婚。亚伯拉罕就曾专门嘱咐他的仆人，在族内给他的儿子以撒娶亲。犹太人的近亲结婚是非常普遍的，甚至有说法是为了家族的财富不外泄，罗斯柴尔德家族等都是要求必须近亲族内婚的。因此犹太人的封闭性是比任何民族都强的，要成为犹太教徒没有血统是不成的。
犹太人现在也是人口不够，犹太教不会如伊斯兰强制他人信教和基督教的传教，而是希望其他种族不生孩子。一个不传教的宗教怎么样的竞争立足？不能让自己很快变多，那么就想办法让别人变少！各种少生不生文化，其实也与之有关。不生育的文化，让其他民族人口减少和低端化，是犹太教传播的重点，这是他们的传教模式。（在对非法移民，尤其是黑色以色列人女性方面，以色列政府以欺骗、胁迫等手段给自己的同胞注射安宫黄体酮，一种长期避孕药，导致这些人生育率腰斩，引发巨大舆论反响）而犹太人的人口增长迅速，以色列的人口从建国的80万人到现在已经超过了900万人。
7、中华文明与犹太教的冲突
犹太教与中华文明信仰是本质的不同，中国人的宽容，来自于多神教的信仰，可以多神共存，与一神教本质不同，而犹太教又是一神教里面最保守最极端的。中国讲天下大同，讲王侯将相宁有种乎，讲努力学习诗书传家，而犹太人是族内婚，骨子里比谁都是血统论，信仰的极端化的。
对此中华文明与犹太人是根本不同的，不光是多神教，而且是宗教宽容的，多神教带来的是宗教宽容，多个神可以在一起。宗教到了中国进行了本土化，多个宗教是和平共处的。中国的传统宗教不仅不会如犹太人那样不传教不传外族，而且中国宗教不歧视异教徒，讲的是普渡众生。中国商代是族内婚，到了周朝就改变了，已经大约3000年来都是各族通婚制。
西方白人的种族主义根深蒂固，但信仰的基督教是各种人都可以的，向各种人传教，也有退出的信仰自由，歧视肤色不歧视异教徒；阿拉伯的伊斯兰是歧视异教徒厉害，相对的不歧视种族；而犹太教是对种族和异教徒都是极为歧视的；只有中华文明是天下大同，信仰自由同时对各民族是友好的，这才是民族自信，也是与犹太文明会有深层次冲突和让他们恐惧的地方。
中华文明讲的是天下大同，这才是民族自信和文化自信。中华民族5000年来基本上是在世界文明的顶端，被西方超越仅仅是不到200年的时间，犹太民族怎么样，其实民族心理是扭曲的。中华文明与犹太人对世界的理解是根本不同的，中国人的宽容，在犹太人那里是没有的，双方和平共处是困难的。
中华文明与犹太教的冲突，还有就是共济会与共产党也不是一起的，共产党讲的很多理念，与中国传统的天人合一，造富天下，天下兴亡匹夫有责，等等是合拍的，而犹太人的则是其延申的共济会的会道门为了小群体的私利，二者其实是不相容的。
犹太人当初就是当代理人的，后来统治了世界，成为幕后统治者，也是最善于搞各种代理人政治的。在中国的社会各个层面，犹太人的代理人渗透非常厉害，而我们现在加强党的建设，与犹太代理人的冲突就加剧了。普世价值、意识形态、舆论场等等，犹太代理人渗透的非常深，与中华文明和党的建设，是有直接的冲突的。
中华文明一直是有广袤的土地，最适合农耕的土地，人口众多，宗教和世俗贵族都是统治者在前台的，所以也宽容；但犹太人统治世界，人口数量和土地占有，是不具备走到前台的条件的，一定是代理人政治。他们的阴暗和狭隘，是中国人理解不了的，他们对你的笑，是不一样的。
老一辈的犹太人已经在变老，基辛格这些人在老去。而新一代中国的八零后的孩子已经成为中坚，他们从生下来就看着中国一天天强大，而且从他们工作开始，中国就日新月异，这对新一代犹太人也是不同的影响，以后中国与犹太人的关系，是新一代孩子们的关系，孩子们已经不是对西方那么崇拜的族群了，中华文明的传统在回归。
8、中国与犹太资本矛盾质变
以前的中国，是犹太人制衡西方其他文明的棋子，而中国要崛起了，不会成为犹太人摆布的棋子的，这一点犹太人看得非常清楚，而中国人对这个地位的变化却还没有那么敏感。
中国的私有化，中国的金融开放，都是有犹太资本主导的，也是犹太资本要得利和渔利的，并且他们还有老本行，作为一些腐败者的代理人，或者帮助国家运筹一些国际外交事务。但他们的诉求，是要在中国实行与西方一样的社会制度，这个社会制度是私有化的、资本化的，而且这些资本还要被犹太财团影响和控制的。他们要做“国退民进”的“民”！但这些是中国的核心利益，中国是不可能让步的。中国新一代领导集体，开启的以民族复兴为蓝图的伟业，与犹太资本的根本目标，是绝对的冲突。
犹太人支持当年的中国改革开放，但他们的“改革开放”的目标，是让中国走向另外一个苏联，走向自由化和私有化，背后是核心资产到犹太人及其代理人手里，这个是中国所不能接受的。十年前中美关系质变，而现在则是与犹太资本的关系质变。当年中国还走在国退“民”进的道路上。这个民在越来越成为犹太资本的买办和代理人。中国新一代领导人的确立，领导集体的任期可以延长，领导集体对中国方向的掌控，与犹太资本的希望背道而驰，双方的关系应当已经出现质变。这也是美国特朗普2018年后的对华施压升级，升级的背后不仅仅是因为他的美国优先，也是因为犹太资本的态度变化，下面即使是换了总统，美国对华的政策应当依然会延续。
犹太资本赚钱的模式为何对华不延续了？其实犹太人远远比中国人有危机意识。中国人现在停留在“吸引犹太资本，犹太资本能够赚到钱，就能够为中国人的崛起服务”这样的主观意识当中，不会理解一些极端宗教和思维为何不是“你对他好他就可以感恩”的情况。其实中国的主流思维还是儒家的，儒家是几千年来的上国思维，是以中国为正统下的施恩与怀柔。但若人家觉得自己是世界的主人，你只不过是工具和奴隶，你对他好是应该的，他剥削你也是应该的。这才是犹太人的逻辑，虽然他们曾经颠沛流离，但也一直是这个想法，这个是文明和宗教层面的事情。
现在我们说中华文明与犹太资本的关系已经质变，背后的关键就是中国让犹太人赚钱，也维持不了原来与犹太人的关系！这一点很多人还抱有幻想。犹太人与中国的矛盾，背后是文明之争，是中华文明的崛起，威胁了犹太资本在全球的统治权，威胁了犹太宗教统治全球的利益！这个矛盾是不可调和的，中华子孙可以接受犹太人赚钱，不会接受受到任何人的奴役，也不会出让国家民族的核心资产，也不能放弃中华文明的信仰和道路。因此矛盾是难以调和的。我们一定要知道的是犹太人的宗教是最不宽容的宗教，也是最自我膨胀的宗教。与中华文明的信仰是完全背道而驰的。
美国代表英语民族，英语民族还有五眼联盟，还有外围印度。美国与犹太人的关系，是盎格鲁撒克逊人与犹太人的历史盟友关系，虽然不说牢不可破，但也有摩擦。另外的欧洲民族，对犹太人的态度就是不同的，现在犹太人与中东的关系，与伊斯兰教的关系，都非常紧张，中国需要的就是不要与犹太人走的太近，犹太人经常是做好人的角色，但其实与美国的鹰派的本质是一样的。中国与犹太资本，没有到破裂的时候，但绝对不是结盟的对象。犹太人与中国的关系，应当在中国崛起和中国主权要求下，中国不给犹太人渗透的私有化，就已经质变了。
放眼全球，在近代500年的历史上，霸权变幻，而犹太资本一直是处于世界的顶端统治
者的位置，尤其是从英国霸权到美国霸权。这300年以来，犹太人与之合作的盎格鲁撒
克逊人的民族属性也没有变，而且在盎格鲁撒克逊民族，建立了相对独立的教会，形成了犹太人能够掌控的共济会这样的神秘组织。同时西方的基督教与犹太教同源，也都是一神教，有很多共识。而中国崛起了，与犹太人能够是合作关系么？共产党是否让犹太资本渗透？中华文明和犹太教会成为什么关系？
所以，我们认为，中国与犹太资本的关系，质变了，不能以老思维来看待未来。
9、中国与犹太资本的未来
中国与犹太人的博弈，犹太人比中国人其实更孤立，有更多的历史仇恨，所以全球的博弈，不是仅仅中国和犹太人。中国不要与犹太人走的太近，更不要以为他们可以变成盟友，而且指望他们给中国崛起的关键时刻进行助力，就更不可能，中国的崛起，是挑战犹太人对全球的金融统治的。美国的退出全球化和美国优先，其实是不给犹太人服务那么多了，中国的全球化，当然更不是接盘美国给犹太人服务的。因为中国与美国在全球化上不是简单的继承关系，犹太人看得比我们清楚。
中国以前把犹太资当作朋友的，对犹太资本也非常友好，好过对其他西方白人。而现在的质变，犹太人不是朋友了，有时候可能还有深藏的敌意，但中国不要把他们变成敌人，这还是差别很大的。犹太人有很多敌人，他们敌视你也不一定必须把你作为敌人，或者头号敌人。他们可能会转移矛盾，让他们的敌人与你成为对手。敌人的敌人未必是朋友，敌人的朋友也未必是敌人。国际关系的逻辑可能是复杂的，不直接的。
犹太人与伊斯兰和基督教的历史恩怨和矛盾非常复杂，伊斯兰的扩张，欧洲的绿化，中东的极端化，也是世界最主要的矛盾，不要被祸水东引，要把握好在西部的分寸，西部的稳定非常重要，胜过西部的开放。
美国与犹太资本不是一个利益体，他们有联盟也有错位。不要美国人施压，就给犹太资本好处。与美国人的勾兑渠道，不能完全依赖犹太中间人了，中国需要多方位的外交。
中国与犹太资本的关系质变，在于双方的蜜月期结束，竞争变成了主要的矛盾，双方有斗争有团结。丛林法则下的利益和利用关系是主流，双方不具备结盟的条件。
我们不反犹，我们也不做犹太人的奴隶和代理人，也做不了盟友，以后双方存在较长时期的竞争关系，而不是以前的相对和缓，这个历史质变，是要认清楚的。
中国历史上给了犹太资本很多好处，而这些好处只能是默认成本了，不要以为给过了好处他们一直可以对华友好。以前的只要对犹太人“改革开放”就能够换取他们的国际帮助的时代，应当也已经要成为过去式。
中国历史上与犹太人是没有冲突和仇恨的，但中国的崛起，是犹太人国际金融秩序所不容的。但犹太人作为世界代理人民族，比世界其他民族更能够隐藏，不会把很多事情表面化和公开化，这一点中国人要看清楚的。
伊斯兰的子宫、极端、反科学，让其他文明塌陷，伊斯兰与基督教的天主教、东正教的矛盾激化，欧洲的绿化，是有利于犹太人和犹太资本的统治的。因为欧洲的天主教、东正教与犹太人和犹太教的矛盾，不比伊斯兰的少。伊斯兰与犹太资本，有矛盾，但没有想的那么激烈。中国不能被挑唆到与伊斯兰文明冲突的最前端。
在国家层面，远交近攻，中国与俄罗斯有很多的地缘矛盾，也有很多合作的基础，关系是微妙的。但在对待犹太资本的问题上，打击犹太资本的掠夺和渗透层面，俄罗斯走得比中国要靠前。目前俄罗斯的强人政治，对犹太资本的态度，比中国坚决的多。这个与苏联解体犹太资本掠夺前苏联财富有关，在普京政府，俄罗斯犹太寡头是被清算的。这也是特朗普想要联俄而犹太资本不干的原因之一。
中国要加强自身全球的情报建设，要有一个与大国相适应的全球情报体系。以前犹太人的摩萨德与我们的合作，需要的是重新进行评估。中国的全球化建设，不光是表面的基础设施，而是中国崛起需要一个全球的情报网。
未来与犹太人的科技和教育的竞争比资本和金融的竞争更关键和更有持续性。中国需要自己的英才培养体系，需要独立的教育体系，需要培养好自己未来的人才。在教育和人才培养上，与犹太人的巨大差距，一定要正视和改变。
时间是在我们这一边的，中国的发展和积累都非常快，要学会等，要避免热战打断发展进程。对犹太资本，他们是无法直接与中国热战的，只能是策动代理人战争。这个战争的参与者可能是美国，可能是印度。犹太人是善于搞代理人战争的！通过代理人来削弱你。历史上各个大国的空心化，与犹太资本的寄生和蛀空是有关的。对制造业大国，打仗不如军备竞赛，中国需要的是拖慢和耐心。
中国应当推动多极化，犹太资本与美国人，可以分成两个极，而不是统一成为一个极。中国讲天下大同，也追求天下多极，中国的宽容民族性，是团结其他民族的关键，当年中国第三世界的提法，在全球就很有号召力，中国现在也需要一个凝聚世界共识的东西，犹太人搞出来了白左的普世价值意识型态，我们是要学习的。
综上所述：
中国与犹太资本的关系，蜜月期已经结束，关系已经质变。要放弃很多幻想和美好的情感，要有竞争意识。在历史上，犹太资本的表现更像一个渣男，中国对犹太人的单相思要改变了，别再想什么夫妻论。犹太人的丛林法则，可是兵不厌诈的，而且他们特别擅长的就是渗透分化和笑里藏刀。中国对犹太人是有根本性冲突的，共赢模式和思维靠不住，和平是依靠斗争得来的。
反对亚裔细分法案 网上近5000人参与连署
世界新闻网
11/29/2021
「亚裔细分」人口数据统计法案目前已在纽约州参、众议会通过，待州长霍楚(Kathy Hochul)后立法，不过该法案遭到亚裔社区反对；日前由亚裔父母平等联盟(Coalition of Asian Parents for Equal Rights)在网络上发起的反对连署，截至29日已经收集到4700多个签名，呼吁霍楚与社区站在同一阵线，共同反对法案。
该法案允许州府将亚裔再细分成各族裔，不再以群体概括归入同一类别，亚裔父母平等联盟在连署网站上表示，亚裔相较于其他族裔已经是少数群体，社区的声音很难让政府或相关机构听到，「这将进一步边缘化亚裔的声音，成为更容易受歧视的目标。」
细分亚裔的相关法案自2011年至今曾多次被提出，不过前州长葛谟(Andrew Cuomo)2019年否决，认为会加重财政负担和运作复杂性；霍楚为第二位考虑签署的州长。
Asian-American groups battle over state diversity data collection bill
By Morgan C. Mullings
11/19/2021
Several Asian American-led groups and legislators are supporting a bill that’s nearly at Governor Kathy Hochul’s desk, but one organization of conservative Chinese advocates wants it vetoed.
The Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Disaggregation bill, sponsored by Brooklyn state Senator Juila Salazar (D-Brooklyn), aims to diversify data collection of Asian Americans into more categories, as the demographic group represents over 30 countries.
But members of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance of Greater New York (CACAGNY) are asking Hochul to veto it, because of its alleged premise of lowering the political power of Asians in New York.
In a statement to the press, the organization said, “Why target Asians, right after the New York Post headlines an article heralding the new political power of Asians in NYC’s Nov. 2 voting? Why target Asians, just as NYC redistricting fights are heating up?”
Salazar’s legislative director, Mark Mishler answers these questions for PoliticsNY: “Senator Salazar … and many of her colleagues in the Senate and the Assembly strongly believe in the empowerment of the entire Asian American Pacific Islander community, and in providing services to the community that reflect the actual needs of different segments and sectors of that community.”
The law, which has passed in the Senate and Assembly, would require every state agency, board, department and commission to collect data with these new categories as quoted in the text of the bill:
“Each major Asian group, including, but not limited to, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Asian Indian, Laotian, Cambodian, Bangladeshi, Hmong, Indonesian, Malaysian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Taiwanese, Nepalese, Burmese, Tibetan, and Thai; And
(B) Each major Pacific Islander group, including, but not limited to, Hawaiian, Guamanian, Samoan, Fijian and Tongan; or
(C) Other Asian or Pacific Island group.”
Many of Salazar’s colleagues that support disaggregation of Asian American demographic data are Asian, such as Lower Manhattan Assemblymember Yuh-Line Niou, and Queens state Senator John Liu – both of whom are Taiwanese American.
Both are also Democrats, which CACAGNY points out in their release. “One thing is certain: this is not a bipartisan bill. Each and every one of the sponsors and co-sponsors of the bill are from the same party,” the organization said.
They are concerned about too many designations for children from two or more cultures, and potentially pitting of some Asians cultures against others.
Mishler, who worked on the legislation, said the bill is actually aimed at understanding everyone’s differences so that the state can better provide for individual needs. In other words, not all Asian Americans want the same thing.
In a letter to the governor endorsed by over 30 Asian-led organizations, the Coalition for Asian American Children and Families said, “Enacting S6639A/A6896A into State law is of particular importance to the [Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander] community because data disaggregation has the unique ability to unify our diverse community.”
The Coalition, which leans liberal compared to CACAGNY, and many others disagree with the narrative that disaggregation bills foster division.
“Data disaggregation allows us to identify where particular struggles lie, so our community can step up to support those who struggle the most,” the Coalition said.
The coalition also believes that this bill can pave the way for improved data collection systems in other communities of color and in the LGBTQ+ community.
“Equipped with disaggregated data, the State can then leverage this information to more accurately innovate policy solutions and deploy much-needed resources toward the State’s most pressing priorities: COVID-19 vaccination, relief, and recovery efforts,” they wrote.
Asian American communities are not the only groups that struggle with perception. The Caribbean diaspora, Latin countries and people of African descent can be treated as monoliths in their own right, despite representing countries and cultures around the world.
Whether that benefits or harms them is up for debate within the community.
Even the term “AAPI,” which refers to the Asian American and Pacific Islander community, became popular after several instances of anti-Asian hate crimes this year, but is subject to scrutiny within the community. How non-white New Yorkers identify changes generationally — see the debate over the term Latinx, which is fairly new and used often by the media, but lacking support among the group it is used to identify.
The CACAGNY’s contribution to racial discussions often leans conservative. They’ve joined an energetic conservative campaign against the alleged Critical Race Theory (talk of which has fomented anger among conservatives over educating students about the historical result of racial discrimination in America’s institutions), and they work to end propositions they believe pit racial minorities against each other. Salazar’s office says they have this one wrong.
New York City to phase out gifted and talented public school programs that critics call racist
“The era of judging 4-year-olds based on a single test is over,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said.
By Jean Lee and Corky Siemaszko
10/08/2021
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio unveiled a plan Friday to phase out the controversial gifted and talented programs for elementary school students that many educators say discriminate against Black and Hispanic children enrolled in the nation’s largest public school system.
It will be replaced by a program called “Brilliant NYC” that will expand the pool of students being offered accelerated learning, and not limit it to just the incoming kindergarteners who scored well on an optional exam that put them on a path to attend the city’s elite middle schools and high schools.
“The era of judging 4-year-olds based on a single test is over,” de Blasio said in a statement. “Brilliant NYC will deliver accelerated instruction for tens of thousands of children, as opposed to a select few. Every New York City child deserves to reach their full potential, and this new, equitable model gives them that chance.”
De Blasio’s announcement, which came in the waning days of his final term in City Hall, sent shock waves through New York City that are likely to be felt in public school systems across the country grappling with similar kinds of racial disparities.
The new plan comes two years after a diversity task force in New York recommended scrapping most selective programs that use test scores and other criteria to determine class placement, and which helped create a two-tier school system where 75 percent of the students in gifted and talented programs were either white or of Asian descent, while the students who didn’t make that cut were relegated to inferior schools with fewer resources.
Critics, including fellow Democrats, quickly pounced on de Blasio’s move.
“Gifted and talented programs have been an integral option for generations of schoolkids,” tweeted state Sen. John Liu, a Democrat from Queens who chairs a panel on New York City schools. “@BilldeBlasio promised intensive public engagement about it but now wants total elimination.”
Some public school parents also expressed alarm.
Marcia Benjamin-Charles, 44, the mother of two public school students in Brooklyn, said she fears de Blasio’s move will result in an exodus of bright students to charter schools.
“I’m African American, and a lot of African American children are going to charter schools now,” she said.
Benjamin-Charles said she considered moving her oldest child, who is now 20, to a charter school after the gifted and talented classes he attended until the 4th grade were discontinued at his school. But she ended up keeping him there and he graduated second in his class.
“I was a public school student,” Benjamin-Charles, who works as a transitional care manager, said. “I turned out fine. I want to give my children the same education.”
But Sok Svay of Queens, whose 14-year-old daughter is a public school student, said de Blasio’s new plan will level the playing field. She said that while her daughter is thriving despite not being in a gifted and talented program, basing children’s future on how they perform on a test taken at age 4 is unfair to the parents who have neither the time nor resources to prep their kids for this examination.
“It’s really exclusionary because when you think about a lot of immigrant parents who cannot read or do not have the time to go through this whole process, their kids will probably be missing out on better programs on account of just being shut out from understanding the process,” Svay, a Cambodian refugee who was raised in the Bronx, said. “Class segregation, which leads to racial segregations, needs to stop.”
Under de Blasio’s plan, students enrolled in the gifted and talented programs will stay in them. But the programs will no longer exist for incoming kindergarten students next fall.
Instead of the much-criticized entrance exam, the city will sort out which third graders should be put in accelerated classes by evaluating their school work and getting input from their teachers.
No longer will these students be separated from their other peers. Instead, they will spend several periods a day working on specific subject areas with specially trained teachers before returning to their regular classes.
The move also puts de Blasio’s likely successor, Eric Adams, in a bind. A Democrat in an overwhelmingly Democratic city, Adams campaigned on a promise to expand the existing gifted and talented program to lower-income neighborhoods and it would be up to him to implement this new program should he be elected.
“Eric will assess the plan and reserves his right to implement policies based on the needs of students and parents, should he become mayor,” Evan Thies, a spokesman for Adams’ campaign, told The New York Times. “Clearly the Department of Education must improve outcomes for children from lower-income areas.”
There was no immediate comment from Adam’s Republican rival, Curtis Sliwa.
Boston Overhauls Admissions to Exclusive Exam Schools
A new policy will increase representation of Black and Latino students in the prestigious public schools, which serve as a gateway to elite colleges.
By Ellen Barry
7/17/2021
BOSTON — Long into the night on Wednesday, parents and students waited in line to say their piece about Boston Latin School and who deserves to attend it.
Shirley Chen-Weng said she arrived in this country from China without speaking English, and raised her children to work hard and succeed. Why, she asked, shouldn’t they get a spot?
Julia Mejia, a Latina city councilor, said she spent her school years working at a shoe store to help her mother pay the rent, without a spare minute for test preparation. What about students like her?
And Gabby Finocchio, a 2019 graduate who is white, said she was admitted to the school because her parents had time and money to spend on the process. In a more equitable admissions system, she might not get in, she said, but “I’m OK with that.”
After five and a half hours of emotional discussion on Wednesday night, the Boston School Committee voted unanimously to overhaul admissions to the city’s three selective exam schools, opening the way for far greater representation of Black and Latino students.
The new admissions system will still weigh test results and grades, but, following a model pioneered in Chicago, it will also introduce ways to select applicants who come from poor and disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Under the new system, the applicant pool will be divided into eight groups based on the socioeconomic conditions of their neighborhoods. The admissions team will consider applicants within each group, admitting the top students in each tier in roughly equal numbers.
“This was really a watershed moment,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, 34, the daughter of Haitian immigrants, who said she was admitted to Boston Latin School only after her father stumbled across a free test preparation course. That path, through a school that “can literally open a door to endless possibilities,” led on to Columbia University, Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School.
“If any of those events didn’t happen, I don’t know where I would be today,” said Ms. Louijeune, who is running for Boston’s City Council. “The world has been open to me. How do we make sure I am not an anomaly?”
The traditional admissions system, which its supporters defend as merit-based, ranked applicants according to grades and test scores. But it also gave rise to a culture of tutoring and test preparation, and resulted in incoming classes that were overwhelmingly white and Asian.
Boston has joined a long list of school districts trying to address racial inequities in its selective academic programs. The debates have divided communities, raising painful questions about whose children deserve to be admitted.
In New York City, the nation’s largest school district, a recent push to eliminate an admissions exam for its top high schools has sputtered, even as the city announced other changes to the way hundreds of selective middle and high schools choose their students.
A proposal by Mayor Bill de Blasio to get rid of the entrance exams to the city’s most elite schools, such as Stuyvesant High School, became extremely divisive, prompting accusations that he was discriminating against low-income Asian American children and pitting Asian families and Black and Latino families against one another. In the end, the State Legislature, which had to approve the change, declined to take action.
Fairfax County, Va., faced a similar challenge. In 2020, the school board agreed to eliminate the admissions test to its flagship math and science magnet school, only to face two lawsuits from families, many of them Asian American, who said the move had inflicted harm on their children.
The same divisions have emerged in Boston. Among the most passionate objections expressed on Wednesday night came from Asian American parents, who said their children were hardly all affluent, and would be unfairly disadvantaged by the new system.
Asian American students were 29.3 percent of Boston Latin School’s enrollment in 2020, despite making up 9 percent of students in the school’s district.
“When they were young, we instilled them with the idea of working very hard to be the best,” said Ms. Chen-Weng, speaking through a Cantonese translator. “There’s a misconception that we’re discriminating against others, but that’s not true, because when we came here, we had nothing. We worked hard to get what we could get.”
Judith Nee, an alumna of Girls’ Latin School, said the white students affected by the change were “firefighters and civil servants’ kids,” not the truly affluent.
“What does it get you other than depriving everyone of perhaps the one real advantage to step up in the world — by weakening the rigor of Latin?” Ms. Nee said. “I literally get sick to my stomach with the thought that we are going to alter a 350-year-old proven world-renowned pathway to a life of intellect. It’s not easy to come by for city kids.”
For decades, sixth graders across the city have crammed for an annual entrance exam, hoping to receive an invitation to Boston Latin School, the most selective of the three schools, which counts among its alumni four presidents of Harvard, four Massachusetts governors and five signers of the Declaration of Independence.
Ms. Finocchio, who entered Boston Latin School as a ninth grader, said it did not take long for her to see patterns in the neighborhoods her classmates came from — middle-class and predominantly white — and by her sophomore or junior year, she was convinced that something needed to be done about it.
“Once I realized how the system works, it was a question of, OK, when are they going to change it?” she said.
Ben Hoffman, 20, who graduated in her class, said he routinely overheard older people fretting about whether the quality of the schools would suffer, “thinking it’s going to be the worst thing ever, and ultimately change the school.” He doesn’t agree. “To some extent, I am puzzled about why so many people in that demographic think it’s going to be a problem,” he said.
It is no surprise that the change is occurring now, as Boston itself has changed.
The middle-class, predominantly white neighborhoods that fed large numbers of seventh graders into exam schools each year had resisted attempts to change admissions, said Lew Finfer, an organizer with Massachusetts Communities Action Network, who has pushed for new policies for 20 years.
But the political clout of those neighborhoods had begun to wane even before last year’s racial justice movement swept through the city, he said, while also crediting “relentless efforts” by Boston’s N.A.A.C.P. and other legal advocates for the new policies.
“There was a degree of reckoning with the George Floyd murder that made it harder to defend sacred cows that were discriminatory,” he said. “That doesn’t mean every institution changed, or every policy. But there was more pressure to deal with things.”
In 2019, voters elected a City Council that was, for the first time, dominated by women and people of color. And all four front-runners in November’s election for mayor are women of color. Among the leading candidates for mayor, only one — City Councilor Annissa Essaibi George — has objected to the change in policy, tweeting that it had been voted in hastily.
“While the plan claims to level the playing field and create improved access, it has not,” she said. “It is unclear, untested and not informed by families across the city.”
City Councilor Andrea Campbell, a Boston Latin School graduate who is also running for mayor, said in a statement that she had “heard from hundreds of parents who are excited by the change and just as many who are worried about how this new policy will impact them because they don’t see another excellent option for their student in the B.P.S. system, which I think proves that this inequitable system is failing all of us.”
Many expect the new policy to face a court challenge. But others were in the mood to celebrate.
“There’s a historical debt owed to families and students of color in Boston public schools,” said Peter Piazza, an educational researcher, describing a litany of efforts to resist desegregation of city schools, including violent riots over busing that shook the city in the 1970s.
“The so-called exam schools are one tiny part of this history,” he said. “But the access is enormously important for the students, whose lives can be changed by the opportunity. We owe them a debt. Let’s pay it at 100 percent.”
Boston’s racial tensions have always spilled out into public view when the subject turns to schools. The tug of war over exam school admissions has led to the awkward and abrupt departure of three members of the school committee.
The committee chair, Michael Loconto, resigned last fall after he was caught, during a recorded Zoom meeting, mocking the surnames of Asian American parents making public comments on the issue.
That was followed by the publication of text messages exchanged between two other members, Alex Oliver-Dávila and Lorna Rivera, expressing frustration with parents from West Roxbury, whom one of them referred to as “Westie whites.”
Both Ms. Oliver-Dávila and Ms. Rivera resigned, too.
TJ High School Admits 550 Students Under New Admissions Policy
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, a top high school in the U.S., admitted students under a revised admissions policy.
By Emily Leayman
6/24/2021
FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA — Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, a governor’s school and one of the nation’s top high schools, announced the incoming freshman class chosen with the new admissions policy.
TJ admitted 550 students for the class of 2025. The Fairfax County School Board has voted to change the admissions policy, eliminating the standardized admissions test, eliminating the $100 application fee, raising the minimum grade point average, and increased the freshman class size from 480 to 550.
Spots in the class of 2025 were determined by the top 1.5 percent of applicants from every middle school. For the first time in at least a decade, every Fairfax County Public Schools middle school has students who were accepted to TJ.
The school saw an increase in applications this year — 3,034 compared to 2,539 in the last school year. The 3.9074 average GPA of applicants was higher than recent years, while the 3.9539 average GPA of accepted students was similar to past years.
As the admissions policy changes aimed to increase access to underrepresented student groups, there were some increases in several demographic groups. Black students made up 7.09 percent of accepted students, while last year’s admission was “too small for reporting,” meaning 10 or less. Hispanic students made up 11.27 percent of accepted students, compared to 3.3 percent last year.
The percentage of white students admitted also increased from 17.7 percent to 22.36 percent. Asian students still represent the majority of admitted students, although the percentage fell from 73 percent to 54.36 percent.
The percentage of economically disadvantaged students admitted also had a significant increase from 0.62 percent to 25.09 percent. Special education students represent 2.36 percent of accepted students, and English Language Learners represented 7.09 percent.
The Coalition for TJ, a group of parents, students, alumni, staff, and community members opposed to the admissions changes, responded to the admissions announcement in a statement. The coalition believes the changes discriminated against Asian students and has an active federal lawsuit.
“We love Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, and we congratulate every student accepted for admission into the TJ Class of 2025,” the coalition stated. “Fairfax County Public Schools has also broken the hearts of many deserving students by waging a crusade against Asian students at the school, first by proposing a random lottery and later by implementing the current race-balanced ‘holistic’ admissions system that amounts to social engineering.”
The coalition also denounced critical race theory, an academic concept studying how racism can be found in various public policies. Opponents see it as a wedge that pits people of color against white people, according to Education Week.
“We seek fairness for all families and students, and we reject the racism of the ideology of ‘critical race theory’ that promotes admissions lotteries and race quotas while killing merit,” The Coalition for TJ stated. “We will continue to fight for an American Dream in which all people have equal protection under the law.”
Thomas Jefferson High School is an admissions-based governor’s school open to students in Fairfax County as well as Arlington, Loudoun, and Prince William counties, and cities of Fairfax and Falls Church. The school was recently ranked the top high school in the nation by U.S. News and World Report.
Parents Defending Education
4/19/2021
Parents Defending Education is a new grassroots organization determined to fight woke indoctrination in classrooms nationwide. “We believe our children’s education should be based on scholarship and facts, and should nurture their development into the happy, resilient, free-thinking, educated citizens every democracy needs,” the organization says.
The website DefendingEd.org features a robust IndoctriNation Map, where visitors can “learn about parent organizations, incidents and FOIA’s” in their area. And Parents Defending Education wants to hear from you: click here to help them shine a light on educational malfeasance in Fairfax County Public Schools!
A new video from Parents Defending Education succinctly conveys the organization’s vision. “I want my child to learn how to think, not what to think,” the voiceover says. “But in K-12 schools today, activists are pushing a radical new agenda. Instead of creating educated individuals, they are trying to create activists, turning blank slates into members of racial, ethnic or gender groups in conflict with each other — but it doesn’t have to be like this.”
Source: https://fairfaxgop.org/watch-parents-defending-education/
A Lawsuit Challenges TJ Admission Changes
Parents sue to stop TJ’s admission policy changes, alleging anti-Asian race discrimination.
By Mercia Hobson
3/19/2021
The Fairfax County School Board and Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Scott Brabrand face a new lawsuit filed against them last week in United States District Court in Alexandria. The lawsuit alleges race discrimination against Asian-American students by the School Board and the superintendent in changing the admissions process to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, known as “TJ.” The Pacific Legal Foundation filed the civil suit on Wednesday, March 10, on behalf of their client, Coalition for TJ, a group of mostly concerned parents at the high school.
#“This type of racial balancing is unconstitutional,” said Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Erin Wilcox at a press conference held that morning outside the courthouse.
Six Spaces Home Staging
Contact: Hongliang Zhang
Tel: 571-474-8885
Email: zhl19740122@gmail.com
#The Plaintiffs allege FCPS’ recently-implemented overhaul of the TJ admissions process changes, which eliminated the long-standing race-neutral standardized admissions test, is specifically aimed to reduce the number of incoming Asian-American students to racially balance the school according to the racial demographics of the school. “Up until this year, admissions to TJ have been race-blind,” said Wilcox. “Unfortunately, Fairfax County Schools officials apparently believed that this is too many Asian students,” she said.
Pacific Legal Foundation holds a press conference on March 10 announcing that they filed a lawsuit against the Fairfax County School Board and Superintendent Scott Brabrand on behalf of their client, Coalition for TJ, challenging recent changes to the admissions policy at Thomas High School for Science and Technology.
#THE COMPLAINT alleges that without the court issuing an injunction, the number of Asian-American students in the incoming TJ Class of 2025 is likely to be cut in half due to the “defendants’ stated desire to manipulate TJ’s demographics.” “The discriminatory intent they’ve shown is intertwined and an inseparable part of the policies they put in place,” Wilcox said.
#According to the lawsuit, in the fall of 2020, Superintendent Brabrand and the School Board saw a reporting requirement by the Virginia Department of Education to include the racial/ethnic make-up and socioeconomic diversity of its students, faculty, and applicants as an opportunity “to completely overhaul the TJ admissions process in order to racially balance the school’s demographics, going far beyond the minimal reporting requirements.”
#Located in Alexandria, TJ is a regional Virginia state-chartered magnet school operated by FCPS with students eligible for admission from Fairfax, Arlington, Loudoun, and Prince William counties, and the City of Falls Church. TJ is ranked the number one public high school in the 2020 National Rankings.
#The School Board voted to eliminate the TJ merit-based admissions test at its Oct. 6 work session with no public comment opportunity. The complaint quotes Brabrand during the discussion at the work session with the Board to say that eliminating the merit admissions test “eliminat[es] the testing component that squeezed out talent and squeezed out diversity in our system.” Board members said they hoped the new process increased Black and Hispanic representation in the student body.
#On Dec. 17, the School Board voted and adopted, with immediate implementation, further changes to the TJ admissions policy applicable to the incoming TJ freshman Class of 2025 and to future years. The Board adopted the challenged admissions policy that limits the number of students accepted from each county feeder middle school to the top 1.5 percent who meet the minimum evaluation criteria-GPA, student portrait sheet, problem-solving essay, and experience factors: including economically disadvantaged students, English language learners, or special education students.
#The lawsuit alleges that coupled with the high concentration of Asian-American students at four middle schools – Carson, Kilmer, Rocky Run, and Longfellow – and their history of sending large numbers of students to TJ, racial balancing could be accomplished.
#According to the complaint, the plaintiffs sought “to vindicate the rights of Asian-American public school children in and around Fairfax County, Virginia, to compete on an equal footing for admission to the nationally-ranked Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ) without regard to their race.” Overall, Plaintiffs’ data analysis reported in the complaint that the student body at TJ, at approximately 73 percent Asian-American students under the merit-based race-blind admissions system would drop to 31 percent under the new racial-balancing admissions system for the Class of 2025 with “no other racial group projected to lose seats.”
#The lawsuit alleges changes to admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment “…a promise that government at every level will treat every American as an individual, not simply as a member of his or her racial group. Policies like the one implemented by FCPS stand in direct opposition to that promise.”
#THE PLAINTIFFS requested entry of an order requiring the Defendants to return to the admissions procedure for entry into TJ in the fall of 2020. “The Coalition for TJ is not going to stand for this kind of discrimination against Asian-American students and they are here to fight for equal protection for their children,” said Wilcox.
#Julia McCaskill, an immigrant, and parent of a TJ student and students in grades 8 and 6, said at the March 10 press conference that TJ does not belong to a certain race or certain group of people. Low admission rates at TJ for Black and Hispanics are the failure of the FCPS Board, according to McCaskill. “They failed those under-represented areas over the decades instead of fixing the pipeline issue. The authorities are stirring up hate against Asian-Americans hoping to slash the number of Asian-American students will fix the overdue school problem.”
#Asra Nomani, a cofounder of Coalition for TJ and parent of a senior at TJ, said during the press conference that she came to the United States at age four from India. Nomani said she was proud to be working the past nine months with families who came to the United States from communist China and eastern Europe, India, and other places where they faced injustice. “They never could have imagined that they would face injustice in America,” she said.
#A Fairfax County Public Schools spokesperson provided a statement saying, “The process continues to be race-neutral and merit-based… As a Governor’s school, we value diversity and believe that it contributes to the richness of the education at TJHSST.”
#Parents of 17 middle school students filed the initial lawsuit in November 2020 to overturn the School Board’s decision to eliminate the standardized admission test for TJ and the $100 application fee. On Feb. 2, a Fairfax Circuit Court Judge John M. Tran denied the parents’ request to require mandatory standardized testing in the admissions process. Tran said, “The debate over standardized testing belongs to educational professionals.”
#On Friday, March 12, Wilcox said that the next step would be the defendants’ response, either an Answer or a Motion to Dismiss, in approximately 60 days. “I’ve seen in various news articles that FCPS issued a statement on Wednesday. Their legal response to our complaint will be one of the documents mentioned,” Wilcox said.
Source: http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2021/mar/19/lawsuit-challenges-tj-admission-changes/
Judge declines to halt elite school’s admissions changes
2/04/2021
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A judge on Tuesday refused to issue an injunction to stop an elite northern Virginia high school from changing its admissions policies.
Fairfax County Public Schools is overhauling the admissions process at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, which has been ranked as the top public high school in the country.
The school board hopes the changes will increase diversity at the school, which has long failed to attract Black and Hispanic students. Standardized tests that have long been part of the admissions process have been scrapped in favor of a more holistic review.
Supporters of the existing system sued, citing state regulations designating TJ as a school for the gifted and stating that giftedness should be measured by a standardized test.
Circuit Court Judge John Tran declined to issue an injunction that would immediately bar the changes from taking effect, but the lawsuit itself can still go forward.
A conservative legal group is also weighing a challenge based on racial discrimination against Asian Americans who currently make up a majority of the student body.
Students, Parents Challenge TJ Admissions Changes
Coalition for TJ | Press Release
11/07/2020
Seventeen parents filed a lawsuit against the Fairfax County School Board and Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Brabrand for illegally changing the admissions process at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology.
TJ, as the school is known, is the nation’s top-ranked public high school, according to U.S. News & World Report. Established in 1985, the STEM-focused Governor’s School has long maintained rigorous, merit-based, race-blind admissions standards that include the administering of a set of standardized tests. In an October 6 work session, however, the Fairfax County School Board voted to abolish the school’s admissions tests, and the superintendent abruptly eliminated the tests from this year’s admissions process.
The lawsuit alleges that the school board and superintendent violated state laws and regulations requiring that a “nationally norm-referenced aptitude test” be used as part of the TJ admissions process to identify gifted learners with an aptitude for STEM. As a Governor’s School, TJ provides services to gifted students, or advanced academic learners, and receives special funding from the Commonwealth for this purpose.
Today, the Coalition for TJ held a press conference outside the Fairfax County Courthouse, announcing that the 17 parents had filed a lawsuit against school officials. “The basis for the complaint against Fairfax County School Board and Scott Brabrand is relatively simple,” Coalition for TJ co-founder Glenn Miller said at the news conference. “Virginia law, which is the superior law and controls the actions of Fairfax County and its school board, contains specific requirements that must be followed in order to admit students to TJ. Fairfax County and its school board violated those laws. As such, the Fairfax County School Board and the superintendent acted beyond their authority and acted arbitrarily and capriciously.”
The abolition of TJ’s standardized admissions tests will invariably reduce the number of Asian students at the school. The lawsuit’s 17 plaintiffs are families of current middle schoolers who are disadvantaged by the admissions changes. Plaintiff James Pan, father of a gifted middle schooler, spoke at today’s press conference. “FCPS is using the pretext of banning the test for their goal of reducing Asians at TJ,” Pan said. “The government is using a process that is plain old bigotry.”
Plaintiff and middle school parent Srinivas Akella said that he chose to live in Fairfax County for its program for gifted students and for TJ, in particular. “The school board and FCPS arbitrarily made changes to the admissions process in violation of state law,” Akella said today. “I have faith in our judiciary, and I am petitioning them as a last avenue since there was no other recourse left for me to pursue.”
Following the plaintiffs’ remarks at today’s press conference, Coalition for TJ co-founder Asra Nomani spoke of the opportunities that TJ has afforded generations of immigrants in Fairfax County. “My father came here for the American Dream. My son pursued it here in this country and is now a student at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology,” Nomani said. “We should not allow anyone — including the Fairfax County School Board and Superintendent Scott Brabrand — to stand in the way of justice. We are all here for the justice that America provides, and I applaud these courageous families.”
WATCH:
•Nov 5, 2020
