华人三代拒打疫苗「禁闭在家」 孩子不上学 大人辞工作




华人三代拒打疫苗「禁闭在家」 孩子不上学 大人辞工作

世界新闻网

01/31/2022

华人三代拒接种疫苗,为防疫全家几乎足不出户。此为示意图。 (Unsplash.com)

洛杉矶县有一户华人家庭,一家三代六口人包括老人与孩子,因为担忧新冠疫苗的副作用,一直拒绝接种疫苗。为了避免感染病毒,这户人家几乎足不出户。但他们表示,愿意牺牲一家人的自由,形同关禁闭在家,既可不接种疫苗,也不会感染病毒。

S女士是这个华人家庭的女主人,两个年幼的孩子、外公外婆,再加上S女士的先生,一家六口人住在一起。自两年前新冠疫情开始至今,这户人家一直深居简出,几乎足不出户。

S女士表示,去年6月加州全面开放后,他们也曾选择带着孩子与同龄人交往,但几个月后,S女士再次选择居家防疫,不再与家庭之外的所有人接触。



对于新冠疫苗,S女士始终认,为疫苗问世时间太短暂,存在很多不确定性,「我不愿拿着家人的生命安全做赌注,疫苗可能存在的副作用谁都不能确定。」

面对越来越多的证据、数字显示,疫苗对防止新冠重症、死亡确实有着非常显著效果,S女士承认这一点,但她表示,「我们一家只要坚持不外出,不接触他人,就没有感染风险,也就没有必要冒着可能存在的副作用接种疫苗。」

S女士先生之前有份工作,加州全面开放后,公司要求他返回办公室上班,但为了居家防疫,先生选择辞职,年幼的孩子也选择在家上网课。平时孩子们只在家中院子玩,S女士说,连附近公园他们都不去,因为担心会接触到一些无症状感染的孩子,唯一的放风机会就是一家人开着车兜一圈,中途不下车直接回家。日常生活用品基本上靠网购解决。



对于这样的封闭生活,S女士认为,对孩子的牺牲会比较大,「但我始终觉得安全最重要,幸好家中有两个孩子可以互相陪伴,习惯了也就不想着出去了。」

S女士坦言,如今像自己家庭这样禁闭的生活模式近乎疯狂,但每个人都有选择如何防疫的方式,相信疫情总有一天会结束,等到那时候一切都值得。

如今让S女士最担心的就是,听说加州可能会要求所有学生必须接种疫苗才能入学。「如果有一天,孩子必须接种疫苗才能返校上课,我们一家可能会考虑搬离加州,找一个不强制接种疫苗的地方生活。」

Source



奥密克戎下的美国华人:辞职、抑郁与释然

来源:在人间 living 

01/30/2022

  自2021年12月新冠病毒变异为“奥密克戎”以来,美国感染人数呈指数级上升,直至今年1月15日才迎来拐点。

  我从2020年初开始在家工作,朋友大多是定居在美国的华人新移民,都是非常小心谨慎的人。大家在第一时间打了疫苗,如非必要尽量不出门,有幸躲过了之前几波疫情高峰。

Omicron BA. 2 will displace BA. 1
Jan 27, 2022

  曾几何时,我看着电视上医院人满为患的景象,觉得自己生活在一个与世隔绝的泡泡里,可以在残酷的现实中保持某种程度上的岁月静好。但随着奥密克戎毒株在美国各州传播开来,最谨慎的一群人也无法幸免。即使每天出门戴口罩也中招,不禁感叹这一波疫情与之前的几波有所不同,真的是防不胜防。



  12月底开始,每天早晨睁开眼,我的第一件事便是查看邻居们建立的Facebook群组(社交平台)。两个话题在群组中的讨论度居高不下:哪家药店能买到自测新冠的试剂盒,哪家超市有新鲜的蔬果销售?

  在家中自测新冠是因为绝大多数提供核酸检测的实验室已爆满,预约的话要等上几天甚至一周,许多人等不及。群组中有人从事超市收银员、餐馆服务生、银行柜台等服务业工作;上班族确诊新冠之后,必须恢复阴性才能返回工作岗位;父母也急着为孩子测试,新学期开学在即,不少学校要求学生确认阴性之后才能复课。

  随着我所处的奥斯汀(美国南部)的确诊案例越来越多,各行各业的人手严重不足。制造业、加工业、物流业人手的匮乏反映在超市的货架上。社区附近的几家大型超市,不少货架空空如也,有的超市甚至把整个售卖肉类海鲜的柜台封了起来。大家只能在群组中互通有无,交流哪家超市新到了鸡蛋,哪家超市刚卸货一箱水果。

  疫情对每个人的影响不尽相同。读博的朋友小陈在圣诞假期前因为搭乘公共交通而感染新冠。她描述感染的经历就像一场厉害的感冒,没有发烧、失去嗅觉和味觉等常见的新冠症状;但是又和感冒不同,“从来没有过那么严重的喉咙痛”。



  小陈连续几天无法安睡,焦虑地度过了几天,但好在瓜果蔬菜、食品、测试盒等必要物资能送货上门,她在家里打打游戏、写写东西,也算把最难的日子挺过去了。可是检测结果阴性后,她还时不时咳嗽,自己觉得仿若得了“Long Covid”(后遗症)。

  我的邻居阿曼达(Amanda)则因突如其来的感染而陷入了财务困境中。根据她在Facebook上的发言,彼时在星巴克打工的她于2020年疫情刚暴发时怀孕。经济的不景气和怀孕的额外开销花光了她原本就不多的积蓄。

  去年年初疫情稍微缓和后,她接种了疫苗,一边带孩子一边工作,但还是捉襟见肘,拿到的工资付完房租、车贷、水电费账单之后所剩无几。她不得不接各种杂活,包括帮邻居遛狗、洗衣干衣等,希望能攒下一些钱给孩子买圣诞礼物。

  圣诞前夕,同事感染新冠后不久,阿曼达也感染了,整整两周不能工作,亦没有收入。为了维持生计,她开始在Facebook网络上售卖自制的小点心,如巧克力慕斯球、裹着巧克力的草莓等。小点心都是常见款式,来帮衬的大多是了解她遭遇的邻居或熟人。



  在奥斯汀经营日料店的埃尔文(Elvin Jin)则面临着严重的人手短缺和供应链问题。

  新冠导致许多农场和加工厂人手不足甚至关闭,继而带来了全球范围内的食材上涨和原料短缺。前段时间,关键的食材如做寿司用的米和醋曾长时间缺货,而最近缺的是拉面。

  与此同时,因疫情而身心俱疲的美国人还在开创一场创纪录的“大辞职潮”,光2021年11月,便有450万余人离开工作岗位。埃尔文的店里人最少的时候,全靠他和身为第一代华人移民的母亲两个人支撑。后来招到员工,但许多都干不长——有人辞职去旅游、有人辞职去进修、有人辞职照顾家人。最忙的时候,埃尔文一边在料理台做菜,一边在门口招呼客人,还要负责买单、收拾用过的餐具。不过,虽然辛苦但是能够不断开发新菜谱、给人们做菜,埃尔文还是感觉幸福。

  第三代华人移民简妮特(Janette)在丈夫感染新冠后,一度担心病情加重后,医疗开支将家庭拖入泥淖中。



  2020年新冠刚流行时,美国的医疗保险取消了和新冠有关的共付额(即患者在接受保险覆盖的服务时需要支付的费用)和免赔额,人们可以免费接受新冠治疗。但是到了2021年,随着疫苗的普及,许多保险公司都不再提供这项优待,住院的患者需要自付几千甚至数万美元的治疗费用,这对刚刚买了新房的简妮特来说是一笔不小的开支。

  简妮特是那种外向又热情、善良还有侠义心肠的女生。过去的两年,疫情加上针对亚裔的歧视,她开始关心社会和政治问题。作为中学老师的她,经常为弱势群体发声,也越来越仇视马斯克、贝索斯等亿万富翁。简妮特非常厌恶亚马逊等网购巨头和本地的大型连锁超市,认为它们在压榨本地劳动力的同时,还挤压了中小企业的市场。

  有一次,我和简妮特聊到大型超市推出的“送货上门”和“下单自取”等服务,让普通人在疫情期间的购物更方便了。我们却起了争执,因为她更关注疫情期间中小企业和个人在财务上面临的困境。

  不过,我也同意简妮特所持的“疫情让富人更富、穷人更穷”的看法。疫情之前,亿万富翁(Billionaires)掌握了全球大约2%的财富,而经过两年的疫情,这些人掌握了全球3.5%的财富。全世界最富有的10个人的财富翻了倍,与此对应的是美国有大约14%的人,在疫情期间花光了应对紧急情况的积蓄。



  我和几位朋友不用为生活开支而担忧,但是闭门不出久了,心情还是抑郁。

  2020年初,疫情刚开始的时候,大家想的是过两三个月世界就能恢复正常。后来疫情持续很久,大家又觉得打了疫苗就好了。2020年底,疫苗刚开始推广,但只有医护人员和65岁以上的老人和有基础疾病的人可以打。当时,大家的新年愿望是希望快点打上疫苗,去旅游、去滑雪、去潜水,飞回中国与家人团聚。

  到了2021年底,听说疫苗对奥密克戎的保护能力下降。大家互道祝福的时候,都不敢许愿,因为不知道该期待什么,更怕愿望落空。1月初,有一天中午下了小雪,聊天群里有人提议去爬山——天气这么糟糕,外面也没有人,我终于有机会离开家,透一透气了。

  心理问题一直是讨论疫情时不可避免的话题。2019年的调查显示,大约有11%的成年人认为自己有焦虑或抑郁等倾向;步入2021年,这个比例上升到了41.1%。

  “每天都在数日子”是纽约李阿姨对最近这段日子的概括。奥密克戎来袭后,她觉得疫苗没那么有效,不怎么敢出门,连买菜的次数也减少了。

  李阿姨的儿子16岁,正在读高中。疫情之后,他差不多一年半的时间没再返校,跟朋友更是缺少正常接触。李阿姨感觉孩子的心理出现了问题,变得忧郁、易怒;但儿子正处在叛逆期,听不进家长的教导。



  美国心理医生协会(American Counseling Association)的官员Lynn Linde说,美国向来缺乏心理咨询从业者,而疫情使情况变得更糟糕。

  李阿姨有切身体会。社会上的心理辅导资源比较匮乏,很难预约,学校里有专门的心理辅导员,但又被儿子拒绝了。为了不激化矛盾,李阿姨只好自己忍耐着,也调整了对孩子发展的期望——更重视健康和人品。

  读完博士正在纽约一家研究机构工作的阿德(Adrian),居家隔离最孤独的那段时间,会打开电视机播放中文的电视连续剧。很多时候,他不是为了煲剧,而是给家中增添一些背景音,借助电视里的人声来假扮一个“社交场所”。感到孤独的时候,阿德就和以前的朋友视频聊天;也会趁天气暖和,出门爬个山。

  他自认不是特别喜欢社交的人。读博的大学地理位置颇为偏僻,又常常一个人做实验;但疫情期间,与世隔绝的处境还是让他压力颇大。特别是2020年初刚搬到纽约安顿下来,新冠疫情就大爆发,很快纽约封了城。疫情稍微缓和后,他在约会软件上认识新朋友。双方初见面的时候,都戴着口罩,也是疫情期间的一大“特色”。



  在去年五月,阿德找到了稳定的恋爱对象。女朋友是在一线抗击新冠的医生。奥密克戎袭来时,医院的新冠患者人数成倍增加,重症监护室爆满之余,急诊也排满了人。新冠病人实在太多,其他病房的住院医师很多被调往治疗新冠病人的重症监护室工作。

  原本因打了疫苗时不时会去餐厅吃饭的阿德又变得谨慎起来,回到了居家办公的模式,不得不出门的时候,口罩也升级为N95。

  奥密克戎刚出来那阵,对未知的恐惧以及对女友的担忧令阿德发慌,直到近期关于病毒的研究和统计数据增多,知道了该毒株的毒性不如德尔塔,疫苗依然可以起到保护作用,他的心理才恢复正常。

  漫长的两年,使阿德格外珍惜生活中的爱情和友情,认识到彼此支持的关系是人生中非常重要的一部分。与女友相距一个半小时车程的他,经常开车去约会,平均一周见一次。见面后,两人就宅在家里,一起撸猫或玩虚拟现实游戏。他期盼疫情过去,和女友出去旅游。

  



  许多留学生因担心疫情,推迟了入学的时间,宁愿休学一阵子。他们支付昂贵的机票,忍受少则14天、多则28天的隔离期,也要回到家人身边。但在奥密克戎肆虐的时候,也有人踏上留学美国的征途。大学二年级的小念便是其中之一。

  来美国留学一直是小念的梦想。在高中时,她便找到留学中介。但是因被中介欺骗加上美国收紧了针对留学和移民的签证政策,她一度放弃了留学梦,考入了中国的一所大学。

  疫情带来了新的机会。小念所在的大学提供赴美交换的机会。由于许多人对疫情期间前往美国心生顾虑,交换生的名额竞争并不激烈。去年11月,她才准备申请;不到3个月,她已在位于雪城的纽约州立大学宿舍安顿下来。

  学校对国际交换生照顾周到。除了负责从机场接送至学校外,还陪着他们去超市采购生活必备品,也安排了打迷你高尔夫或保龄球、看电影等娱乐活动。



  当地时间2021年12月27日,美国华盛顿特区,有1011架次美国境内或者境外往返美国的航班被取消,超过2400架次航班被延误,乘客在罗纳德·里根国际机场等待。根据多家航空公司的说法,大量航班取消的主要原因是新冠变异病毒奥密克戎毒株导致的美国新冠肺炎确诊病例激增,航空公司出现人员短缺的情况。

  从数据上看,疫情仍然很严重,但真正置身其中时,好像又没那么吓人。

  美国人和华人对疫情的恐惧程度不相同,彼此采取的防疫措施也不同。小念的同学尽管佩戴口罩,但有时候并不按规定,所以起不到什么作用。学校每两周测一次核酸,如果是阴性的话,小念会得到一个手环,佩戴一段时间,证明自己是“阴性”的。

  我仔细回想疫情期间的点点滴滴,冲击和困难是不可避免的,但好像也有一些感动与温暖的瞬间。

  减少社交活动之后,我有了很多时间阅读和写作,自学了绘画,也把早就忘掉的粤语重拾起来。两年以来,和许多朋友没再见面,但和住得近的几位朋友变得更加亲密。很久没有回国,就把乡愁化成熟悉的中餐。我和朋友一起包饺子、煮火锅,端午节包粽子,中秋节做月饼。



  后来发现,不少华人都在疫情期间成了农夫加厨子,阿德还在家里发豆苗。有的华人餐厅在疫情期间改变了经营模式,注重网上团购和远程送餐。我也团购过几次,冬天的北风里,和几十名华人排成一队领餐,回去再把地道的中国美食加热之后饱餐一顿。生活虽然不够完美,但是也没有特别糟糕。

  还有不少华人在疫情期间做义工。李阿姨觉得虽然疫情肆虐,也有许多不好的社会事件发生,但是爱与正义才是主流表现。纽约市全体中小学生享受免费早午餐,疫情时不能去学校,政府分三次将餐补转给他们,每个学生分到1700多美元。市政府的救助也优先考虑下层人,无家可归者由政府出钱安置在旅馆。她的儿子在食物银行做义工,把三文鱼、肉、蛋、奶、水果等发给愿意排队领取的人。

  去年12月底,哥伦比亚大学研究生辛迪(Cindy)在朋友圈询问,是否有人愿意到路口派发食物给流浪汉。

  疫情以来,辛迪对新冠的态度发生了转变,从恐惧过渡到放心。打了疫苗加强针之后,她更是觉得自己“年轻力壮”,感染的风险比较低,再加上一般在室外活动,哪怕疫情最严重的几周,她也坚持做志愿者帮助流浪汉。为了安全起见,在出门前她还是会自测一下——是不是“阴性”。这次,她和伙伴为流浪汉带去了60份三明治、60份汤和48瓶水。

  但疫情影响的不仅仅是无家可归的人,还有一起分发食物的志愿者。有位移民小哥将自己的手套赠予了用袜子给双手取暖的流浪汉,他自己却靠开优步(Uber)维持生计。奥密克戎爆发的两个月,大家都不怎么出门,他赚不到钱,为房租和保险发愁的同时,连牙痛也不敢去看医生。

  



  这两天,社区Facebook群组里浏览最多的帖子,已经从询问哪里有试剂盒变成了一线护士开的答疑解惑帖。

  护士在帖子里回复和新冠有关的常识性问题,告诉大家医院打疫苗的时间,也将工作时得到的试剂盒送给有需要的邻居。他自己每天工作12到13个小时,但仍然抽空回复,并谢绝了邻居付费的好意。

  政府承诺每户人家每个月可以免费获得4个新冠试剂盒。1月18日,我已经可以从美国邮政(USPS)官网上预定,并享受免费的送货服务。

  居民们的燃眉之急解决后,群组中的焦虑气氛一下子减少了。有人分享可爱的宠物照片,也有人商量给刚安置到附近的阿富汗难民家庭捐食物和衣服。

  《柳叶刀》于1月19日发表了一篇评论文章,称新冠病毒或将继续存在,但全球新冠“大流行”即将结束。这篇文章被转发到群里。两年多来,只在网上打过照面的人纷纷起哄,等政府宣布疫情结束之后,要在公园里办大型派对,每个人都带着酒和宠物来,一起狂欢庆祝。

  (文中辛迪Cindy为化名。)

Source



贡献一个真实新冠病例

By Shorea

01/30/2022

抗疫两年,终于还是中招了。

我家绝对是防护最严格的那一批华人,自从2020年初疫情开始在美国爆发至今,我们没去外面吃过任何一次餐馆,在外面活动一定全程戴口罩,保持社交距离,随身每个包上挂一个酒精洗手液随身洗手,一个月去一次超市,其他购物基本网购,任何东西进屋之前都先用紫外光和臭氧消毒,车里也臭氧消毒,人把外面衣服都脱下来消毒,进屋第一件事情就是全家洗澡洗鼻子。两个大人都打了三针,儿子打了第一针。两人基本都是wfh, 女儿也还没去上幼儿园。唯一的破口就是,儿子得去上学。


就是这个破口,让一切防护都等于0。这周日晚上儿子突然声音变得很沙哑,在家自测阴性,于是第二天正常上学,第二天被学校打电话让接回来,说开始发烧。当晚去测就阳性了。


接下来一周内,儿子基本上在床上躺了两天两夜,最高烧到104度。好在每次吃了泰诺就会退烧,并且能坚持6小时以上才再发烧。主要就是困,想睡,喉咙痛。烧了两天之后,基本没事了,还偶尔有咳嗽,喉咙痒。




儿子确诊后第三天晚上,女儿开始发烧,高到105度。也是吃泰诺就退烧,而且症状比较轻,基本不咳嗽也不叫喉咙痛,吃一次药能过12小时以上不发烧。一共就烧了三次,现在也没事了。


两个大人也在这段时间相继出现症状,主要就是喉咙痛,头疼,晕,困。有一晚上觉得发冷,应该是发烧了。但大部分时间都是感冒症状。到现在已经4天,症状见缓,但还没消失。

说了那么多,总结起来有一些想法:


1. 只要有小孩上学,一切防护在o变种面前都是不存在的。


2. 目前看来,大号流感说法是接近的,症状和感染力比流感要强。从没感冒的女儿和很少感冒的儿子都发烧了。


3. 疫苗显然防不了感染o.至于是否防重症了?不知道。


4. 说打了疫苗更容易感染也是扯淡。儿子说他们班上目前所知道还没感染的五六个同学里,至少有4个是知道打了两针疫苗的。


5. 后续的恢复,听天由命吧,希望能早点扛过去。

Source



一个屋檐下家人得新冠怎么办?CDC更新指南

来源:美国中文网

01/28/2022

  如果有家人得了新冠但又碍于居住面积狭小,很难做到单独隔离,遇到这种情况该怎么办呢?

  CDC在其网站上更新了专门针对这种情况的指南。指南说,如果可能的话,还是要尽可能的保持与生病家人的距离。如果无法将感染的人与其他同居住的家人分开,这就变成了持续的密切接触者。在这种情况下,您可以采取一些预防措施尽量限制新冠的传播:

  • 新冠患者及同居住的人都应在家中佩戴合适的口罩。

  • 如果可能,应由一人照顾新冠患者,以限制密切接触的人数。

  • 采取措施保护自己和他人,减少家中的传播:如果您没有接种加强针疫苗,请进行自我隔离;如果您生病或新冠检测呈阳性,即使您没有症状,也要隔离。

  在最新的指南中,CDC建议尽量为检测呈阳性的家人腾出专门的房间和浴室。CDC还建议如果和感染的家人有密切接触,应该隔离五天。在隔离之后,即便没有任何发病症状,仍要进行检测。



  据2021年的一份研究,全美有8100万人住的地方不适合居家隔离。在洛杉矶儿童医院于2020年进行的一份研究中发现,近一半的受访者生活在每间卧室有两人以上的家庭中,其中77%的人在前一年的年收入低于5万元。

  这份研究的研究人员指出,“我们注意到,在拥挤的家居环境中,二次传播的感染率非常高。”

  在Omicron变种的高度传播之下,尤其要注意拥挤的居住环境所带来的防疫挑战。早在去年12月初,CDC就发布了一份报告,称Omicron似乎能够在“有严格隔离措施”的不同酒店房间之间传播。

  来自丹麦的数据发现,在接种疫苗的家庭中,Omicron的传染性比Delta高出3.7倍,但在未接种疫苗的家庭中,两个变种的传染率基本类似。这说明Omicron变种能够更“聪明的”躲避疫苗而带来的抗体。

  卫生专家指出,虽然疫苗不能完全高效地防御Omicron变种的传播,但是,疫苗在防重症方面仍旧是非常有效的。

Source



N95口罩可以重复用几次?专家支招

世界新闻网

01/28/2022

N95口罩,到底可以戴多久?(美联社)

自Omicron变种病毒带来新一波疫情,越来越多民众开始佩戴N95口罩。白宫近日开始免费派发每人3个N95口罩后,民众开始思考:每个口罩,到底可以戴多久?

根据CDC规定,医护人员可以重复使用N95口罩5次;但公卫专家对此有不同看法…

N95到底可以重複用多少次?專家支招
Jan 28, 2022

Source



民众抢用N95口罩 北加教授建议如何消毒再利用

世界新闻网

01/21/2022

这波Omicron病毒传染性极高,许多人开始抢购N95口罩,却不懂得如何使用。(记者江硕涵/摄影)

新冠病毒疫情发展两年以来,病毒不断变化,但若政策和防疫方向跟不上疫情发展趋势,造成更多资源浪费,劳民伤财。专家分析,这波Omicron病毒传染性极高,许多人开始抢购N95口罩,却不懂得如何使用,有些人还将N95口罩拿去加热消毒,都是错误的做法。

台大特聘讲座教授暨美国海军研究学院荣誉特聘教授张智北分析,Omicron变种传染性极高,美国政府终于证实布口罩没什么用,建议民众戴N95或KN95,许多人为了要重复使用这些价格昂贵又难买到的口罩,居然像处理布面口罩一样,拿N95口罩去清洗或消毒,犯了严重的错误。

他分析,因为水洗、消毒或加热,都会破坏N95口罩内夹层的三层滤网和静电吸附功能,功能一被破坏,病毒就可能从滤网空隙钻入,要不然就会让滤网堵塞,而使呼吸的空气从四周进出,用户也许会觉得呼吸反而通畅了,但其实是口罩的效用完全被破坏了,等于没戴口罩。



张智北分析,正确的做法应该是,轮流使用四、五个N95口罩,每天用过以后就放在一个开口的纸袋子里,口罩上如果有病毒,一、两天以后就会失去活性,若是去了有新冠病人的场所,用完就立刻抛弃,这样至少一个口罩可重复用许多天,直到潮湿、脏污或有异味迹象,或耳环松动失去弹性,口罩边缘产生空隙时,再抛弃。这样比较环保又能提高口罩使用效益。

他分析,两年前新冠疫情刚开始时,美国政府曾释放误导的消息,告诉人民口罩要留给医院用,一般人不需要,那时民众普遍对病毒缺乏认知,还把个人预防感染的重点放在消毒上,很多科学家研究病毒在不同物体表面能存活多久,买东西要戴手套,回家要换衣换鞋、淋浴,甚至邮件包裹要先放外面一夜等。

张智北分析,直到2020年6月才开始有专家质疑,这些躲避碰触的狂热是否太过分了,也直到那时,专家对病毒感染的途径研究开始有些眉目,发现主要感染途径是空气传播,所谓的空气传播不只是感染者近距离咳嗽、喷嚏飞沫,而是空气中悬浮的微小粒子(气溶胶)。



张智北说,美国政府和世界卫生组织专家们就像航行中的货轮一样,很难转弯,各坚持己见,后来新的研究陆续发表,一百多个大气科学同行联名上书,才终于敲醒官方专家,承认呼吸才是感染最重要的途径。

他说,直到现在为止,都没有一篇够分量的研究论文,找到因为接触对象而感染的确切证据,但这个巨大的错误,不知浪费了多少资源和人力,而制造清洗和消毒液的几家大公司,却赚取了亿万美元的利润,若同样金钱用来购买口罩和检测剂,或许可挽救数以万计的人命。

张智北说,回到N95口罩的话题,如今因为Omicron变种病毒传染性极高,美国政府也证实布口罩没什么用,建议民众戴N95或KN95,许多人为了要重复使用这些价格昂贵又难买到的口罩,又开始陷入一窝风抢购热潮,因此建议大众,若真的用N95口罩,照着他上述方式静置处理就好,不要特别清洗、消毒,反而造成口罩失效,又再次浪费资源、造成错误防疫。

台大特聘讲座教授暨美国海军研究学院荣誉特聘教授张智北。(张智北提供)

Source



史上最大规模 拜登政府下周起免费发放4亿个N95口罩

世界新闻网

01/19/2022

加州一座生产N95口罩的工厂。路透

拜登政府预计在几周内免费发放4亿个N95口罩防疫。发放地点包括地区药局和社区健康中心,将是美国史上规模最大的个人防护设备(PPE)发放行动,将从下周稍晚开始。

Source



Biden administration to distribute 400 million N95 masks to the public for free

By Jeremy Diamond and Paul LeBlanc, CNN

01/19/2022

The Biden administration will make 400 million N95 masks available to Americans for free starting next week, a White House official told CNN, the latest federal step aimed at reining in the US’ Covid-19 surge.

400 million free N95 masks will soon be available to Americans
Jan 19, 2022

The masks — which are coming from the Strategic National Stockpile — will be made available at a number of local pharmacies and community health centers, the official said, adding that the program will be “fully up and running by early February.”

“This is the largest deployment of personal protective equipment in US history,” the official said.



People looking to pick up the free masks will be limited to three per person, a White House official said.

“To ensure broad access for all Americans, there will be three masks available per person. In addition to this program, thanks to the administration’s efforts, these high-quality masks are in ample supply and widely available to American consumers,” the official said.

The 400 million non-surgical N95 masks amount to more than half of the 750 million stored in the US’ Strategic National Stockpile, a figure that tripled over the last year as the White House sought to boost reserves. The US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention recently advised that well-fitting respirators approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health — such as N95 masks — offer “the highest level of protection” against Covid-19.



The administration’s step comes as the US grapples with an unprecedented surge in Covid-19 cases. An average of more than 750,000 new Covid-19 infections were reported every day over the past week, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

“I know we all wish that we could finally be done with wearing masks. I get it,” Biden said last week in remarks on his administration’s coronavirus response. “But there is a — they’re a really important tool to stop the spread, especially of the highly transmittable Omicron variant. So, please, please wear the mask.”

Earlier this month, the CDC changed its mask guidelines to recommend that people “wear the most protective mask you can that fits well and that you will wear consistently.”



“Cloth masks are little more than facial decorations. There’s no place for them in light of Omicron,” CNN medical analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and visiting professor of health policy and management at the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, recently said on “CNN Newsroom.”

Beyond masks, the federal government has also quietly launched its website to sign up for free Covid-19 tests, allowing people to order a maximum of four tests shipped directly to their household.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed Tuesday that the government website to order free tests was up and running as part of a “beta phase” ahead of the government website’s formal rollout Wednesday morning.

Source



华人大妈亲述奥米克戎的得病经历

By Wu Zhong

01/18/2022

我是去年三月打的第一针疫苗, Moderna , 四月第二针,然后十一月底打的 Booster, 都是 Moderna 。

第二针和 Booster 都有明显的疫苗反应,不过过了24小时都好了 。 结果去年圣诞节的时候还是被感染上的,没有Loss of taste, 所以估计就是 O 了. PCR和 Rapid test 都测了阳性,所以肯定是确诊的了。

中间几天病得算不轻的,发烧到102.4, 差点准备去 ER, 不过还是凭着身体硬抗过来,吃了很多维生素片,现在20多天了,测了还是阳性,每天会有不间断的咳嗽,有痰。

还有个问题就是每天晚上睡觉起来都会有严重的头疼,之前是没有过的。现在只能祈祷今后没有严重的后遗症了。

我感觉算比较倒霉吧,平时都是 WFH, 一般出门买菜也就 Costco, 而且我都是戴 N95或者 KN95 的,现在是强烈怀疑是在 Costco 被传染的。

Source



俄研究:奥密克戎在陶瓷表面存活时间最短

文 / 林煇智

01/18/2022

研究显示,奥密克戎毒株在陶瓷表面失去活性的速度最快,不到24小时就已检测不到。(档案照)

(早报讯)俄罗斯一项最新研究显示,冠病变异病毒奥密克戎在陶瓷表面存活时间最短,病毒的传染性在24小时内消失。

新华社报道,为评估奥密克戎毒株的传染性,俄罗斯“矢量”病毒学与生物技术国家科学中心研究人员在同等空气相对湿度(30%至40%)和温度(26至28摄氏度)条件下,在金属、塑料、陶瓷板上和蒸馏水中对奥密克戎毒株存活性进行比对实验。

结果表明,奥密克戎毒株在陶瓷表面失去活性的速度最快,不到24小时就已检测不到。

该机构称,奥密克戎毒株活性下降的动态变化总体上与此前发现的其他冠病变异毒株并无不同,因此使用消毒剂依然是预防感染的有效方法。

Source



以色列初步研究 打第4剂疫苗恐无法预防Omicron

中央社 | 耶路撒冷

01/17/2022

根据以色列初步研究结果,注射第4剂COVID-19(2019冠状病毒疾病)疫苗会使人体抗体数量超出注射第3剂,但恐怕仍不足以预防感染Omicron变异株。(美联社)

根据以色列初步研究结果,注射第4剂COVID-19(2019冠状病毒疾病)疫苗会使人体抗体数量超出注射第3剂,但恐怕仍不足以预防感染Omicron变异株。

以国希巴医疗中心(Sheba Medical Center)传染病部门负责人芮格夫-尤柴(Gili Regev-Yochay)指出,注射第4剂疫苗会使抗体数量「比注射第3剂再多一些」;并说,这只是初步研究结果,尚未正式发表。

以色列一年前是初步施打疫苗速度最快的国家,上个月已开始为最脆弱的高风险人口施打第4剂疫苗,也就是第2追加剂。

Source



“频繁接种或致免疫力下降,应像流感一样打疫苗”

韩国中央日报

01/13/2022

图为波兰一名83岁女性正在接受新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫苗的第三次接种。【照片来源:美联社=韩联社】

在以色列等部分国家已开始实施新冠肺炎疫苗第四针接种的情况下,有人指出,过度反复接种新冠疫苗反而会对免疫系统产生负面影响。

据彭博社11日(当地时间)报道,欧盟(EU)下属机构欧洲药品管理局(EMA)当天警告称,如果每4个月追加接种一次新冠疫苗,最终可能会导致免疫力下降。EMA解释说,各国应增加注射间隔,在像流感一样寒冷的季节前接种。



EMA主管疫苗的负责人马尔科·卡瓦列里(Marco Cavaleri)当天在媒体会上说,虽然可以再接种一次新冠病毒疫苗,但我认为不能持续反复接种疫苗”,“我们需要思考如何将目前的疫情转变为本土流行病”。

上述警告也出现在已经实施第4轮接种的以色列。由专家组成的以色列疫苗咨询委员会去年12月底建议60岁以上高龄人群和免疫低下人群等进行第四轮接种,但卫生部以数据不充分为由暂时搁置批准。当时一些科学家担心,如果数次接种疫苗,反而会使免疫系统疲劳,导致身体与冠状病毒抗争的能力受损。

以色列著名传染病专家、舍巴医疗中心教授埃亚尔·莱塞姆(Eyal Leshem)认为,接种2次疫苗及之后再打一次疫苗就能起到充分的预防效果。



莱塞姆教授当天接受CNBC电话采访时说,如果接种三次疫苗,相对长期持续免疫,可以防止陷入新冠病毒引起的重症”,“为了应对变异,可能需要每年更新疫苗,但如果毒性较弱,比如奥密克戎的情况,如果已经完成了2-3次接种,可能不需要再进行接种”。

目前,以色列以高危人群为中心对免疫低下者、高龄人群、医务人员等实施了第4轮接种。智利也在前一天开始了针对免疫低下者的第四轮接种,下个月将把接种对象扩大到第三轮接种满6个月的55岁以上成年人。

Source



最新民调:已完成接种疫苗美国民众逾三分之一仍染疫

世界新闻网

01/12/2022

一项民调显示,已完成接种新冠疫苗的美国民众当中,超过三分之一仍然感染新冠病毒。(美联社)

Axios新闻网站与市场研究调查机构易普索(Ipsos)11日公布最新联合民调显示,已完成接种新冠疫苗的美国民众当中,超过三分之一仍然感染新冠病毒。调查结果显示,高达九成受访者说,认识的亲朋好友之间有人感染病毒;另有57%受访者表示,反对政府发放失业救济金给不遵守雇主疫苗接种规定而丢掉工作的劳工。

调查结果显示,已完成接种(fully vaccinated)的民众当中,有36%表示后来还是照样染疫,接受病毒检测得到阳性结果。相较之下,2021年12月中旬的相同问卷调查里,已完成接种受访者当中有22%表示后来仍然染疫,2021年夏季期间,已完成接种民众当中只有6%表示后来还是感染新冠病毒。



36 percent of Americans now say the became infected with Covid-19 after being fully vaccinated. Here, a vaccine is prepared for administration at Union Station in Los Angeles, California on January 7, 2022.FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

这项调查是在今年1月7日至10日之间进行,访问对象为抽样选出的全美1054名18岁以上成年人,抽样误差在正负3.2%以下。

Axios新闻网站报导,从这项最新调查的结果可以看出,绝大多数美国人为Omicron变种病毒感到忧虑,为了降低曝露于病毒的风险、减少病毒传播,日常生活当中做出了某些相对调整。


Sen. Burr Closing Remarks at HELP Hearing on COVID Variants

On January 11, 2022, the Senate HELP Committee met with federal officials to discuss the response to new COVID-19 variants.


报导指出,调查结果也反映了美国民众对疫情感到忧心的可能原因:新冠疫苗恐怕不足以对抗Omicron变种病毒。

易普索美国事务公关部总监杨格(Cliff Young)指出,美国民众觉得受到疫情再度袭击,纷纷调整生活方式,「如果他们自己并没有调整,关系非常密切的亲人则都做出了调整」。



易普索副总裁纽沃尔(Mallory Newall)说,Omicron疫情升高期间,美国民众生活调整非常广泛,几乎回到2021年4月间居家避疫的状态,而当时绝大多数美国人都还没打疫苗。

统计显示,总计52%受访民众说,若要回归到美国发生新冠疫情之前的正常生活,恐怕还要一年以上;约有75%受访者说,与2020年春季相比,感觉现在染疫风险更高。


Fauci, health officials testify at Senate hearing on COVID variants | full video
Jan 11, 2022

Dr. Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and other health officials testified before a Senate committee Tuesday on the federal response to COVID-19 and new variants. The Biden administration announced Monday Americans with private insurance will be able to ask for reimbursement for at-home rapid tests beginning Saturday.


在没有打疫苗的受访者当中,30%表示Omicron疫情让他们变得较可能愿意接种疫苗。在去年12月的相同调查中,仅19%未打疫苗受访者说,因为Omicron疫情而变得较愿意接种疫苗。

在这项调查中,57%受访者表示,反对政府发放失业救济金给不遵守雇主疫苗接种规定而丢掉工作的劳工。

Source



才打第三剂新冠疫苗, 电视主播节目中突重摔倒地 骇人视频疯传

文章来源: 东森新闻

01/11/2022

巴西一名电视台主持人不久前接种第三剂新冠疫苗,3日在直播节目中看来一切正常,没想到播报到一半身体45度倾斜,下秒重重倒地,工作人员和观众都吓了一跳。这段影片掀起热议,部分网友质疑,这可能是第三剂疫苗副作用。

▲ 席尔瓦主持节目中突然心脏病发倒下。

当地媒体报导,现年36岁的席尔瓦(Rafael Silva)是巴西TV Alterosa电视台节目主持人,3日在节目中突然心脏病发倒地。影片中可见,席尔瓦对着镜头播报到一半,身体开始向后倾斜,平板从手中飞出,接着整个人重重撞上身后的背板,昏倒在地。电视台赶紧切换画面,但他昏倒的过程已经完整播出。



事发后现场工作人员马上将席尔瓦送医,他在前往医院途中5度心脏麻痹,情况相当危急,所幸经过治疗后已经没有生病危险,目前仍在加护病房,但病情稳定,预计11日再度接受检查。

JORNALISTA RAFAEL SILVA – MAL SÚBITO
Jan 3, 2022

他昏倒的画面在网路上疯传,令许多网友感到震惊。有人翻出席尔瓦的推特发文,发现他不久前才刚接种第三剂疫苗,当时还开心亮出照片。因此有传言指出,席尔瓦心脏病发是疫苗引发的副作用,不过电视台人员已经出面否认此说法。

席尔瓦的同事洛佩斯(Kadu Lopes)说明,他在去年12月28日接种疫苗,昏倒则是在3日,有人说他是打完疫苗突然不适,但专家已经排除这种可能性,且为席尔瓦治疗的医师表示,他患有先天性心脏病,这次昏倒也和他的遗传性疾病直接相关,并非疫苗副作用。

Source



Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries/Deaths

11/06/2021

Rumble — Roundtable discussion with vaccine injured and medical experts on federal vaccine mandates and the importance of health care freedom.


美国陆军飞行医官特蕾莎中校关于新冠疫苗的证词

By 萧笙客 

11/06/2021

11月2日,飞行医官特蕾莎·朗中校在约翰逊参议员主持的关于新冠疫苗的圆桌会议上的作证。

美国德州胡德堡陆军基地负责四千名陆军飞行旅官兵身体健康和飞行安全的军医特蕾莎反对对官兵、特别是飞行员强制性注射疫苗,向法院提出的临时禁令书写的补充材料。

Source



Sen. Johnson hosts panel highlighting people claiming to be harmed by COVID-19 vaccines

By WEAU 13 News

11/06/2021

Sen. Ron Johnson held a roundtable with several people who say they or a loved one experienced life-altering side-effects from various COVID vaccinations Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2021.(Gray TV)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (WEAU) – Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson is giving a stage to people who claim they were harmed by COVID-19 vaccinations.

Tuesday, Johnson held a roundtable with several people who say they or a loved one experienced life-altering side-effects from various COVID vaccinations.

One panelist, who says she experienced adverse side effects from the vaccine, called for a federal safety net for others who are also injured.

Another woman at the meeting claimed that those who catch COVID receive medical help, while those who have adverse side effects to vaccines are ignored.

The panel included researches and doctors who generally agreed vaccines have a role in fighting the pandemic, but also cautioned against mandating them.

Johnson said the panel is not about creating fear or increasing vaccine hesitancy, but says federal health officials aren’t being honest when they say the vaccines are safe and effective, and shouldn’t be mandated.



“I had COVID,” Johnson said. “I’ve had my antibodies tested as my doctor told me. I’ve got a whopping level of antibodies.”

Johnson also spoke about his personal vaccination decision.

“Again, natural immunity should be strong, pretty long-lasting, which is the case of very, you know, many, many illnesses, many viruses,” Johnson said. “And so there’s no reason for me to get a vaccine.”

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fact page maintains the vaccines are safe and effective. It also acknowledges the existence of some of the adverse effects discussed at Johnson’s roundtable, and says COVID vaccines are under the most intense safety monitoring in U.S. history.

Source


Survey: Majority of Federal Employees Disagree With Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

Comments submitted as part of the survey show a diversity of thought on the requirement. 

By COURTNEY BUBLÉ

he majority of federal employees recently surveyed (53%) strongly or somewhat disagreed with the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, while 44% strongly or somewhat agreed with it. 

The Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive, sent a survey between October 27 and November 2 to Government Executive and Defense One readers, which drew 3,186 respondents. The survey had a 95% confidence level and margin of error of +/- 3%; the vast majority of respondents currently work for a federal agency but the results did include some retirees and congressional and private sector workers. President Biden announced the mandate on September 9 and the deadline is November 22. 

“I am not pro or anti-vaccine, I am pro-choice,” wrote one federal employee in the comments section. “It should be a choice not a mandate, last I knew this was a free country.” Anonymous comments submitted as part of the survey show the diversity of thought on the mandate as well as the nuance of arguments on both sides. 


Thirty-percent of respondents said they thought the vaccine mandate will be slightly or moderately effective in protecting the federal workforce from the coronavirus; 42% thought it will be very or extremely effective and 29% thought it will not be effective. 

“The vaccine mandate is most likely legal. It’s also probably effective,” said a respondent. “It, however, does not mean the federal [government] should have the power to force adults and the civilian workforce to get a shot that they don’t want.” 

The mandate requires all federal employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19 by November 22, or claim a religious or medical exemption. Those who decline vaccination and whose agencies deny their exemption requests will face progressive discipline, up to removal from the federal service. 

Another respondent said, “the mandate will not be effective if the many false religious exemptions are approved,” because “most are not sincerely held beliefs, but just people that don’t want to get their vaccine.”



A different person said, “A coworker’s choice not to be vaccinated increases my potential exposure to COVID, potentially increases my workload if I have to cover for them if they are out ill and increases the cost of [Federal Employees Health Benefits]/Medicare.”

The survey looked at the difference of views among those on full telework compared to those going into the office at least one day a week. The chart below shows approval and disapproval levels based on that status, with those going into the office at least once a week more likely to strongly disapprove of the mandate. 

“If you can do your job, i.e. telework, without contacting others there is no reason to be vaccinated,” said one federal employee in the comments section. “It is the individual’s body and they should have the right to decide what is done to it without fearing economic ruin.”

Another said, “​​I worked and put the protocols in to keep everyone safe. I worked on the front lines for the last two years and now you want to fire me?”



One respondent who said they work for the Agriculture Department’s Farm Service Agency said they love their job and customers they serve, “but lately I do not feel the agency has my back or appreciates the work our agency does. After being on the front lines, figuring out telework, changing the way our agency goals are achieved I feel the employees deserve a little more than a ‘do it or get out policy.’ ” 

As for the ability to enforce a vaccine mandate, 50% of respondents strongly or somewhat disagreed that the federal government has the authority to enforce the requirement, while 46% somewhat or strongly agreed. There were no major differences in responses from managers and non-managers to this question; however, there were some differences among those in different work environments, as shown below. 

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a legal opinion in July that says federal law doesn’t prohibit public and private entities from mandating coronavirus vaccines, even if those vaccines do not yet have full authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Also, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a similar decision in May, which it updated in October

As for regions, the area with the highest approval rating (54%) of the mandate was the D.C. metro area, which is where federal agency headquarters are concentrated. Respondents living in the Southwest had the highest disapproval rating. 



“The D.C. power brokers are using us as pawns,” said a respondent. 

While not a question in the survey, many raised concerns in the comments section about loss of employees due to the mandate. 

“Is the federal government prepared to lose 20-30% of its workforce to retirements, resignations or terminations?” said one respondent. 

“I will retire from federal service if I am threatened with discipline/firing,” said another. “ I am proud of my military service (Vietnam veteran) and federal service (FBI and [Internal Revenue Service]) and continually received ‘outstanding’ performance evals as GS-14. The federal mandate is morally wrong.” 

Someone else said, “this is a train wreck, but may provide promotion opportunities for the younger workforce.” 

However, there were also several comments encouraging vaccinations. “I sincerely appreciate efforts to get our team vaccinated,” said one person. “I am grateful for the mandate and wish it had come sooner.”

For comparison, recent survey from Qualtrics, an experience management company, found that the majority of respondents (58%) supported vaccine mandates from either employers or the federal government. 



“Employees in the [technology and information technology] industry are the most supportive of federal vaccine mandates compared to those who work in health care, retail and government,” said Qualtrics. “Roughly a quarter of government, health care, and private employees oppose mandates that would apply to them.” 

Overall, 42% of respondents want their company leaders to enforce the mandate, while 39% do not, the Qualtrics survey found. That survey was done between October 12 and 15. There were 1,309 respondents who were chosen from a randomized panel and deemed eligible if they live in the United States, are an adult and are at least part-time employees. 

Government Executive previously reported about reactions to the mandate from NASAFederal Bureau of Prisons and other federal employees. While some agencies have shared their vaccination levels with reporters, lawmakers or the public, the levels are not known for all. Top House Republicans are seeking those numbers by November 10. 

In one example, as of late October, several intelligence agencies had at least 20% of their workforce unvaccinated, with some as high as 40%, said Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, who is a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Associated Press reported on Friday. He cited information that the Biden administration gave to the committee, but hasn’t released publicly, and didn’t name the specific agencies since the full results were classified. 

Source



Biden admin considering vaccine mandate for businesses with fewer than 100 employees

OSHA rule for big businesses forces employees to be vaccinated or wear masks and get weekly COVID-19 tests

By Tyler Olson | FOX Business

11/05/2021

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is “seeking comment” about whether businesses with fewer than 100 employees should be subject to the COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandate it is implementing on big businesses

OSHA’s requirement will force businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccines or else their employees will need to wear masks and be tested for COVID-19 weekly. It will go into effect Jan. 4. 

President Biden holds his face mask and waves as he exits Air Force One at Capital Region International Airport, Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2021, in Lansing, Michigan. Biden’s administration is implementing a COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandate on big busines (AP Photo/Evan Vucci / AP Newsroom)

But according to a summary released by OSHA, it appears to be considering implementing the rule for small businesses as well. 



“OSHA is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly, but is less confident that smaller employers can do so without undue disruption,” the summary says. “OSHA needs additional time to assess the capacity of smaller employers, and is seeking comment to help the agency make that determination.”

The same language is included in the Federal Register page for the vaccine rule.

In this July 27, 2020, file photo, nurse Kathe Olmstead prepares a shot that is part of a possible COVID-19 vaccine, developed by the National Institutes of Health and Moderna Inc., in Binghamton, New York. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink / AP Images)

A Department of Labor spokesperson told FOX Business Friday that it is indeed considering whether to extend the vaccine or mask and testing mandate to businesses with fewer than 100 workers. 



“OSHA chose a 100-employees threshold at this time because the agency is confident that employers with 100 or more employees have the administrative capacity to implement the standard’s requirements promptly,” the spokesperson said. “Because the emergency situation required OSHA to act quickly, the information immediately available to the agency did not allow it to confidently assess the impact on smaller firms.”

The spokesperson added: “OSHA will consider whether to extend the rule to smaller firms in the public rulemaking that begins with the publication of this emergency rule.”

Source



Raytheon CEO warns company could lose ‘several thousand’ employees over vaccine mandate

By Mike Brest

10/27/2021

Raytheon CEO warns company could lose ‘several thousand’ employees over vaccine mandate

Raytheon Technologies’s top boss warned that the U.S. aerospace and defense company will lose thousands of employees who have thus far refused to comply with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

“So, we’re going to be faced on Dec. 8 with a choice. We’re going to potentially lose several thousand people who refuse to be vaccinated,” Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday. “Now, this is a tough thing, but we are preparing for it.”



Hayes also said that 83% of the company, which has a total workforce of roughly 125,000 U.S. employees, according to Reuters, is already vaccinated while another 6% are “in the process of being vaccinated.”

Additionally, there is another 3% of employees who are seeking either a religious or medical exemption, while another 3% have said they don’t intend to receive the vaccine, the CEO added, though he did not address the status of the employees who do not fall into those categories.

The company has already begun hiring people to fill the upcoming vacancies, Hayes said.

Raytheon had issued a companywide mandate requiring vaccination by Jan. 1, but that order was usurped when President Joe Biden declared that all federal contractors must receive the vaccine by Dec. 8.



Hayes’s comments came the same day Alabama Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville sent a letter to the White House claiming that Biden’s “federal contractor vaccine mandate will have negative effects on our national security” and called on the president “to remove — or, at a minimum, delay and clarify — vaccination requirements on private companies and academic research institutions that are actively supporting the Department of Defense.”

Similarly, nearly a dozen Republican lawmakers on the House Armed Services Committee petitioned the White House and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to reverse the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate for contractors over fears that it could lead to supply chain issues.

Roughly 100 employees at United Launch Alliance, a Lockheed Martin and Boeing joint venture that contracts to both the Pentagon and NASA, walked off the job Monday over the federal government’s vaccine mandates and pledged to continue protesting in the days leading up to the deadline to be vaccinated.

Source



Former WSU football coach Nick Rolovich to sue university over firing after refusing vaccine

According to a press release sent by his attorney, Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior.”

By KREM Staff

10/20/2021

PULLMAN, Wash. — Former Washington State University football coach Nick Rolovich was fired Tuesday, Oct. 19 after refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and now he plans to sue the university. 

According to his lawyer, Rolovich will be taking legal action against WSU and all parties responsible for his termination. The decision to terminate Rolovich came after his request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the WSU. According to his lawyer, WSU  “indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made.”

Rolovich is accusing WSU Athletic Director Pat Chun of “discriminatory and vindictive behavior,” according to the statement from his lawyer, Brian Fahling.

“Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired,” Fahling says. “Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation.”



In the statement, Fahling says, “Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Rolovich and his family. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”

Pope Francis, the leader of the Catholic Church, has encouraged people to get the COVID-19 vaccine. 

Here is the statement from Rolovich’s lawyer in full:

“The termination of Washington State football coach Nick Rolovich on Monday was unjust and unlawful. 

It came after Coach Rolovich’s request for a religious exemption from the vaccine was denied by the University. The institution also indicated that even if the exemption had been granted, no accommodation would have been made. As a result, Coach Rolovich will be taking legal action against Washington State University, and all parties responsible for his illegal termination. 



Immediately after terminating Coach Rolovich, WSU Athletic Director, Pat Chun, directed campus police to escort the coach to his car, he wasn’t allowed into his office, and he was not even allowed to speak to his team. Since at least early April, it became clear that Chun had already determined that Coach Rolovich would be fired. Chun’s animus towards Coach Rolovich’s sincerely held religious beliefs, and Chun’s dishonesty at the expense of Coach Rolovich during the past year is damning and will be thoroughly detailed in litigation. 

Chun’s discriminatory and vindictive behavior has caused immeasurable harm to Coach Rolovich and his family. Furthermore, the University’s deceitfulness about being unable to accommodate Coach Rolovich even if his religious exemption request had been granted, is exemplified by Chun’s actions arranging a “secret” donor trip that he had Coach Rolovich attend at the height of the pandemic in July 2020. 

During that excursion, Chun and other attendees contracted the disease, but Coach Rolovich did not. It is a tragic and damning commentary on our culture, and more specifically, on Chun, that Coach Rolovich has been derided, demonized, and ultimately fired from his job, merely for being devout in his Catholic faith.”

KREM has reached out to WSU for a statement but has not yet received a response.

Source



320万年薪傲视全州公务员 华盛顿州立大学教练拒打疫苗遭开除

10/20/2021

华盛顿州立大学(Washington State University, WSU)足球队总教练罗洛维奇(Nick Rolovich)因拒绝遵守华州要求公务员必须接种新冠疫苗的规定,本周稍早已被开除。美联社

华盛顿州立大学(Washington State University,WSU)足球队总教练罗洛维奇(Nick Rolovich)年薪320万元,在领取州政府薪水的公务员收入排行榜称霸。但因罗洛维奇拒绝遵守华州要求公务员必须接种新冠疫苗的规定,本周稍早已被开除。华盛顿邮报报导,罗洛维奇堪称到目前为止,最为引人注目的公职人员拒打疫苗而丢饭碗案例。

华盛顿州立大学18日宣布已经解聘罗洛维奇。华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队(Washington State Cougars)体育主任秦派特(Pat Chun,音译)指出,罗洛维奇拒绝配合疫苗接种规定,已经失去获得校方聘用的资格。

秦派特在声明中说,这起事件让学校足球队感到沮丧。

42岁的罗洛维奇出身于夏威夷大学(University of Hawaii)足球队,2019年曾获西部山区联盟(Mountain West Conference)最佳教练。罗洛维奇年薪320万元,是领取华州州政府薪水的公务员当中排行最高者。



罗洛维奇今年暑假已经表明坚决不打疫苗,太平洋十二校联盟(Pacific-12 Conference)在洛杉矶举办媒体宣传,由于规定全体出席者必须打疫苗,罗洛维奇便因此缺席。

秦派特指出,校方与罗洛维奇协商长达数月,但罗洛维奇态度坚定,「他有权做出选择,他的决定就是不配合规定」。

华盛顿州立大学校长薛尔兹(Kirk Schulz)则在声明中说,虽然少数人士拒打疫苗而引发轩然大波,但学校接近90%雇员及97%学生则都打了疫苗。

薛尔兹说:「人们可以做选择,而且有好几个月的时间可以决定。这并不是突然发生的。」

除了罗洛维奇之外,华盛顿州立大学美洲狮队另外四名助理教练罗戈(Ricky Logo)、理查森(John Richardson)、史特兹曼(Craig Stutzmann)、韦伯(Mark Weber),同样因为拒打疫苗,一并遭到开除。

Source



美国ESPN知名体育记者拒打疫苗被开除

本文源自: 金融界网

10/20/2021

  迪士尼旗下娱乐与体育节目电视网(ESPN)的知名记者艾莉森-威廉姆斯(Allison Williams)周一表示,她因为拒绝接种新冠病毒疫苗而被解雇,下周将是她在这里工作的的最后日子。

  这位明星记者最出名的是她对美国大学橄榄球和篮球比赛的报道,她在社交媒体上的一段视频中说,她要求豁免不接种疫苗的请求被拒绝了。

  威廉姆斯从2011年3月开始为ESPN工作。上个月,她在推特上发表声明称,在咨询了医生后,她拒绝接种疫苗,因为她和她的丈夫正试图生第二个孩子,接种疫苗“不符合我的最佳利益”。

  ESPN的母公司迪士尼是众多要求员工接种疫苗的企业之一。该公司在一份声明中说,不会对威廉姆斯的个案置评。迪士尼表示,公司正在按照其法律义务,处理员工提出的豁免要求。

Source



ESPN’s Allison Williams explains why she’s giving up her job over a vaccine mandate

By ANDREA HSU

10/20/2021

ESPN reporter Allison Williams reports from a college basketball tournament at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., on March 8, 2017. Williams said in a recent Instagram video that she is leaving ESPN due to the company’s vaccine mandate.
Lance King/Getty Images

ESPN college basketball and football reporter Allison Williams has joined a small minority of workers who have quit or been fired from their jobs over a vaccine mandate.

“I have been denied my request for accommodation by ESPN and the Walt Disney Company, and effective next week, I will be separated from the company,” she said in a video posted to Instagram on Friday.

ESPN’s parent company, Disney, had announced a vaccine mandate over the summer with a deadline of this Friday, Oct. 22.



In early September, Williams shared on Twitter that she’d decided not to get a COVID-19 vaccine while she and her husband were trying to have a second child.

“Taking the vaccine at this time is not in my interest,” she wrote.

The CDC has urged people who are pregnant or might become pregnant to get vaccinated, saying there is currently no evidence showing COVID-19 vaccines cause fertility problems and no data pointing to an increased risk of miscarriage among people who received an mRNA vaccine during pregnancy.

In the Instagram video, Williams spoke of her medical apprehensions about receiving the vaccine and added, “I am also so morally and ethically not aligned with this.”



“Ultimately, I cannot put a paycheck over principle, and I will not sacrifice something that I believe and hold so strongly to maintain a career,” she said in the video. “I’m going to pray things get better and that I can see you on the television set in some capacity in some stadium, covering some game soon.”

Williams, who had reported for ESPN since 2011, acknowledged she’s not the only one walking away from a career or a profession they love.

Hundreds of hospital workers have quit rather than get vaccinated, but they represent only a tiny fraction of employees overall. For example, Duke Health in North Carolina reported it had fired just 20 people out of a workforce of 23,000.

Meanwhile, United Airlines said it is terminating a couple of hundred of its 67,000 employees who did not comply with the airline’s vaccine mandate. Other employers that have imposed vaccine mandates are also reporting compliance rates topping 90%.

Source




Veteran police officer resigns over vaccine mandate in chronically understaffed department

The department has chronically been understaffed and more officers could resign over the mandate

By Emma Colton | Fox News

9/21/2021

A nearly 30-year police veteran in California resigned over San Jose’s vaccine mandate as the police force continues struggling with chronic understaffing. 

“First of all, it’s my religious belief. I also believe I’ve been given a choice about what to do with my body,” Sgt. David Gutierrez said after he resigned from the San Jose Police Department this weekend, KPIX reported

Gutierrez spent 23 years with the San Jose Police Department working as a homicide detective, internal affairs investigator and patrol supervisor, before retiring in 2019. He then returned to the force as a reserve officer. 



Gutierrez worked his last shift at the department on Saturday, and said he sent a letter to the city manager on Monday denouncing the city’s vaccine mandate, which requires city employees to show proof of vaccination or get a medical exemption. Those who don’t comply face disciplinary action, such as termination.

“Disciplinary action is when you have done something wrong,” Gutierrez said, according to NBC Bay Area. “I have done nothing wrong – by making a choice not to be vaccinated why would you be disciplined?”

Gutierrez added that he is not anti-vaccine and would be open to the city testing him on a weekly basis instead of enforcing the vaccine or getting a medical exemption. 



“I’m not anti-vaccine. I don’t tell people, ‘You shouldn’t get it.’ But when it comes to my body, it’s my choice about what I want to put in my body,” Gutierrez said.

He sent his resignation letter ahead of the city’s Sept. 30 deadline for employees to get the vaccine, and said more officers could also walk off the job amid the department already facing understaffing issues. 

“We are already understaffed and can’t afford to lose more,” Gutierrez said.

“If they let go police officers who’ve been here five years, 10 years, 15 years, you can hire somebody else, but you’re not going to hire that experience though,” he added.



A recent audit examining the last 10 years of the police department found the force has heavily relied on overtime as it struggles with understaffing. 

About 200 officers in the department have so far asked for exemptions, many of which are for religious purposes. But the Democratic mayor, Sam Liccardo, says the vaccine mandate is overall working and doesn’t anticipate an exodus from the force. 

“This is certainly for the protection of the individual members of our city team. But it’s also, critically, for the safety of our entire community because we know, obviously, first responders are out there interacting [with the public] every day,” Liccardo said, according to KPIX.

Source



Northern NY hospital to stop delivering babies after resignations over Covid-19 vaccine

BY Christine Vendel 

9/12/2021

A hospital in New York plans to stop delivering babies later this month because too many maternity workers resigned rather than get the Covid-19 vaccine.

Lewis County Health System Chief Executive Officer Gerald R. Cayer announced at a news conference Friday afternoon that the maternity department would be closed on Sept. 25 until they can find enough vaccinated nurses to safely reopen it.

Cayer told reporters in Lowville, is the North Country of New York state, that seven of the 30 people who have resigned from the hospital worked in the maternity department, according to the news site NNY360.



Seven additional maternity workers have not said whether or not they will get their first vaccine shot by Sept. 27, which is the deadline set by the state for healthcare workers to get at least one shot, according to the news site.

The health system has a higher than average percentage of its staff vaccinated, Cayer told reporters, with 464 employees vaccinated out of 650, or 73 percent.

But there are still 165 employees who have not yet shared their decision with hospital management, WWNY television news reported.

Medical services in five other departments may have to be cut back as well if more staff members resign because they refuse to be vaccinated



“It just is a crazy time,” Mr. Cayer said, according to NNY360, “It’s not just LCHS-centric. Rural hospitals everywhere are really trying to figure out how we’re going to make it work.”

“If you don’t have staff, how do you deliver the service? That’s what I’m going to be talking about,” Cayer said.

The Health System is one of only two county-owned hospitals left in the state and is the largest employer in the county.

Source